D O'Dochartaigh1, M Douma2. 1. Air Medical Crew, Shock Trauma Air Rescue Society, Suite 100, 1519 35 Ave E, Edmonton Int'l Airport, Alberta T9E 0V6, Canada. Electronic address: domhnall13@hotmail.com. 2. Clinical Nurse Educator, Emergency Services, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta T5H 3V9, Canada. Electronic address: matthew.douma@albertahealthservices.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound examination of trauma patients is increasingly performed in prehospital services. It is unclear if prehospital sonographic assessments change patient management: providing prehospital diagnosis and treatment, determining choice of destination hospital, or treatment at the receiving hospital. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to assess and grade the evidence that specifically examines whether prehospital ultrasound (PHUS) of the thorax and/or abdomen changes management of the trauma patient. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of trauma patients who had an ultrasound of the thorax or abdomen performed in the prehospital setting. PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science (CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and the reference lists of included studies were searched. Methodological quality was checked and risk of bias analysis performed, a level of evidence grade was assigned, and descriptive data analysis performed. RESULTS: 992 unique citations were identified, which included eight studies that met inclusion criteria with a total of 925 patients. There are no reports of randomised controlled trials. Heterogeneity exists between the included studies which ranged from a case series to retrospective and prospective non-randomised observational studies. Three studies achieved a 2+ Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Networks grade for quality of evidence and the remainder demonstrated a high risk of bias. The three best studies each provided examples of prehospital ultrasound positively changing patient management. CONCLUSION: There is moderate evidence that supports prehospital physician use of ultrasound for trauma patients. For some patients, management was changed based on the results of the PHUS. The benefit of ultrasound use in non-physician services is unclear.
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound examination of traumapatients is increasingly performed in prehospital services. It is unclear if prehospital sonographic assessments change patient management: providing prehospital diagnosis and treatment, determining choice of destination hospital, or treatment at the receiving hospital. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to assess and grade the evidence that specifically examines whether prehospital ultrasound (PHUS) of the thorax and/or abdomen changes management of the traumapatient. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of traumapatients who had an ultrasound of the thorax or abdomen performed in the prehospital setting. PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science (CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and the reference lists of included studies were searched. Methodological quality was checked and risk of bias analysis performed, a level of evidence grade was assigned, and descriptive data analysis performed. RESULTS: 992 unique citations were identified, which included eight studies that met inclusion criteria with a total of 925 patients. There are no reports of randomised controlled trials. Heterogeneity exists between the included studies which ranged from a case series to retrospective and prospective non-randomised observational studies. Three studies achieved a 2+ Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Networks grade for quality of evidence and the remainder demonstrated a high risk of bias. The three best studies each provided examples of prehospital ultrasound positively changing patient management. CONCLUSION: There is moderate evidence that supports prehospital physician use of ultrasound for traumapatients. For some patients, management was changed based on the results of the PHUS. The benefit of ultrasound use in non-physician services is unclear.
Authors: Christopher Partyka; Andrew Coggins; Jimmy Bliss; Brian Burns; Michele Fiorentino; Pierre Goorkiz; Matthew Miller Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2021-11-24
Authors: Christian B Laursen; Anja Hänselmann; Stefan Posth; Søren Mikkelsen; Lars Videbæk; Henrik Berg Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Kristin Tønsager; Marius Rehn; Kjetil G Ringdal; Hans Morten Lossius; Ilkka Virkkunen; Øyvind Østerås; Jo Røislien; Andreas J Krüger Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 2.655