Literature DB >> 26264596

Therapeutic Potential of Denosumab in Patients With Lung Cancer: Beyond Prevention of Skeletal Complications.

Javier De Castro1, Rosario García2, Pilar Garrido3, Dolores Isla4, Bartomeu Massuti5, Belén Blanca6, Jimena Vázquez6.   

Abstract

Approximately up to 40% of patients with lung cancer develop bone metastasis, with 22% to 59% of them experiencing skeletal-related events (SREs), which result in an important quality of life deterioration and economic burden. Denosumab, a fully human antibody that targets the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) ligand (RANKL), is indicated for prevention of SREs in patients with solid tumors and has demonstrated superiority in breast and prostate cancer, and in other solid tumors, in reducing the risk of first SRE by 17% versus zoledronic acid. In the subset of patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), denosumab has also shown a positive trend to SRE risk reduction. Denosumab might have direct or indirect antitumor effects. Cancer cells produce factors that stimulate increased bone resorption by osteoclasts, which in turn release tumor growth factors into the bone microenvironment, initiating a tumor/bone vicious cycle. An increasing body of evidence suggests RANK/RANKL signaling plays a role in this tumorigenesis. Both proteins are overexpressed in different tumor types including lung cancer cells. RANK/RANKL signaling activates nuclear factor-κB pathways related to lung carcinogenesis and increases intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression and MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation, which in turn enhances tumor cell migration. In animal NSCLC models, denosumab delayed bone metastases and reduced skeletal tumor growth. In patients with lung cancer (post hoc analysis), denosumab prolonged overall survival by 1.2 months versus zoledronic acid (P = .01). This hypothesis-generating outcome warrants further investigation and 2 studies in lung cancer are ongoing to elucidate the therapeutic potential of denosumab beyond SRE prevention.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone metastasis; Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB; Skeletal-related events; Survival; Tumor growth factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26264596     DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer        ISSN: 1525-7304            Impact factor:   4.785


  12 in total

1.  Prediagnostic Calcium Intake and Lung Cancer Survival: A Pooled Analysis of 12 Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Danxia Yu; Yumie Takata; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; William Blot; Norie Sawada; Emily White; Neal Freedman; Kim Robien; Edward Giovannucci; Xuehong Zhang; Yikyung Park; Yu-Tang Gao; Rowan T Chlebowski; Arnulf Langhammer; Gong Yang; Gianluca Severi; Jonas Manjer; Kay-Tee Khaw; Elisabete Weiderpass; Linda M Liao; Neil Caporaso; Steinar Krokstad; Kristian Hveem; Rashmi Sinha; Regina Ziegler; Shoichiro Tsugane; Yong-Bing Xiang; Mattias Johansson; Wei Zheng; Xiao-Ou Shu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Prognostic effects of osteoclast inhibitors in extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients with bone metastases.

Authors:  Atsushi Mitsuhashi; Yusuke Okuma; Yoshitaka Zenke; Yukio Hosomi
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-04

3.  The Therapeutic Effect and Clinical Outcome of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Bone Metastasis in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yohei Asano; Norio Yamamoto; Satoru Demura; Katsuhiro Hayashi; Akihiko Takeuchi; Satoshi Kato; Shinji Miwa; Kentaro Igarashi; Takashi Higuchi; Hirotaka Yonezawa; Yoshihiro Araki; Sei Morinaga; Shiro Saito; Takashi Sone; Kazuo Kasahara; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Incidence and predictors of Bone Metastases (BM) and Skeletal-Related Events (SREs) in Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): A Swiss patient cohort.

Authors:  Katrin Conen; Raphael Hagmann; Viviane Hess; Alfred Zippelius; Sacha I Rothschild
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  BRCA1 haploinsufficiency cell-autonomously activates RANKL expression and generates denosumab-responsive breast cancer-initiating cells.

Authors:  Elisabet Cuyàs; Bruna Corominas-Faja; María Muñoz-San Martín; Begoña Martin-Castillo; Ruth Lupu; Joan Brunet; Joaquim Bosch-Barrera; Javier A Menendez
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-23

6.  GALC Triggers Tumorigenicity of Colorectal Cancer via Senescent Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Mengdi Yang; Zhiyuan Jiang; Guangyu Yao; Zhiyu Wang; Jing Sun; Huanlong Qin; Hui Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Does denosumab offer survival benefits? -Our experience with denosumab in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Yenong Cao; Muhammad Zubair Afzal; Keisuke Shirai
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Soft coral-derived Aspernolide A suppressed non-small cell lung cancer induced osteolytic bone invasion via the c-Fos/NFATC1 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Heng Jiao; Wenli Jiang; Hongliang Wang; Hao Zheng; Haobing Yu; Caiguo Huang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  RANK-RANKL Signaling in Cancer of the Uterine Cervix: A Review.

Authors:  Peter A van Dam; Yannick Verhoeven; Julie Jacobs; An Wouters; Wiebren Tjalma; Filip Lardon; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Jonatan Dewulf; Evelien Smits; Cécile Colpaert; Hans Prenen; Marc Peeters; Martin Lammens; Xuan Bich Trinh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  BMP2 signalling activation enhances bone metastases of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Fei Huang; Yaqiang Cao; Gui Wu; Junying Chen; Wanzun Lin; Ruilong Lan; Bing Wu; Xianhe Xie; Jinsheng Hong; Lengxi Fu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.