Literature DB >> 26261393

Laparoscopic Wedge Resection of Gastric Stromal Tumor (GIST).

Josip Samardzic1, Boris Hreckovski1, Ismar Hasukic2, Sefik Hasukic3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic treatment in general, in recent age has proven that it is well associated with low morbidity, mortality, fast recovery, less pain and sound oncologic outcomes. Recent reports from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) GIST Task Force and the GIST Consensus Conference under the auspices of The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) show that laparoscopic resection may be used for small gastric GISTs (< 2 cm in size). CASE REPORT: We report, all the benefits of laparoscopic approach which include short hospitalization, less pain, better cosmetic effect and good oncological outcome, in this case report of 60 year old female patient with gastric GIST larger than 2 cm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GIST; laparoscopic resection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26261393      PMCID: PMC4500382          DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2015.69.203-205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Arch        ISSN: 0350-199X


1. INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal smooth muscle neoplasms. Approximately 60-70% are located in the stomach but can arise anywhere within the gastrointestinal tract. They are originating from the interstitial cells of Cajal or their stem cell precursors. The majority of GISTs (approximately 95%) express the CD117 antigen (KIT), a proto-oncogene product; 85-95% of these neoplasms have mutations in the c-KIT gene; only 5-7% has mutations in platelet-derived-growth factor a (PDGFRa). Ofter they are asymptomatic and found during examinations for other reasons. Usually they present themselves with abdominal pain and bleeding (1). Diagnostic work up can be changeling and consists of endoscopy, ultrasonography, computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance exam. Endoscopy often fail to detect sub-mucosal and extraluminal GIST, and a biopsy specimen is often negative. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA), performed under the guidance of ultrasound or computed tomography, have been developed as reliable method to obtain tumor cells, and have allowed the preoperative diagnosis of GIST by histological examinations with immunohistochemistry (2, 3). Laparoscopic wedge resection could be considered as a procedure of choice and a valid alternative to the conventional open approach for the resection of gastric Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) smaller than 2 cm; Recent reports from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) GIST Task Force and the GIST Consensus Conference under the auspices of The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) show that laparoscopic resection may be used for small gastric GISTs (< 2 cm in size) (4). The development of endoscopic stapling devices and the evidence that laparoscopic resection of GISTs is effective with minimal morbidity and no reported mortality (5). There is still debate regarding the most appropriate operative approach for larger GISTs. Surgical resection with free margin is the gold standard treatment for GIST lesions and complete surgical resection is the only curative treatment of GISTs (6).

2. CASE REPORT

We present a 65 years old female patient admitted to hospital due to numerous vomiting, epigastric discomfort and loss of appetite. Ultrasound and endoscopy revealed a prominence into gastric lumen but endoscopic biopsy came negative for malignant disease. CT scan showed hyperdensitive extraluminal mass that prominates to gastric lumen located and originating from posterior wall of stomach, but no signs of liver metastases, peritoneal dissemination and ascites. Magnetic resonance (Figure 1) with contrast confirmed CT scan findings and showed no attachment to vascular or other abdominal structures. Patient was informed about laparoscopic approach and gave informed consent.
Figure 1

Magnetic resonance GIST with contrast

Magnetic resonance GIST with contrast Surgical technique She underwent laparoscopic wedge resection using three ports and linear stapling (Figure 2). Resection stapler line was oversawn by intracorporal second line using 3-0 Vycril (Figure 3). Extraction was done by Endobag through umbilical port site (Figure 4). Duration of operation was 65 minutes. There was no postoperative complication and patient was discharged on 5th day. Pathohistological finding confirmed GIST, and his size was 3,5×5×3,5 cm with mitotic activity of 1 mitose per 50 High Power Field. Imunohistochemical staining was positive for DOG-1 and CD117, and negative for Desmin and CD34.
Figure 2

Gastric stromal tumor (GIST)

Figure 3

Laparoscopic wedge resection of gastric stromal tumor (GIST)

Figure 4

Extraction GIST by Endobag through umbilical port site

Gastric stromal tumor (GIST) Laparoscopic wedge resection of gastric stromal tumor (GIST) Extraction GIST by Endobag through umbilical port site

3. DISCUSSION

As recommended for Gastric GISTs, treatment consists of surgical wedge resection without lymphadenectomy and represents cure for patients with primary localized tumors (7). Since gastric GISTs rarely metastasize to lymph nodes, there is no need for lymphadenectomy (8). In order to achieve adequate oncologic resection, 1 to 2 cm free margin is recommended (9, 10). So treatment of choice is simple wedge resection for gastric GISTs, and it caries low risk of complications, fast recovery and good oncological outcome (11). Recent reports from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) GIST Task Force and the GIST Consensus Conference under the auspices of The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) show that laparoscopic resection may be used for small gastric GISTs (< 2 cm in size) (4). Laparoscopic resection of gastric GISTs appears safe when performed by a surgeon who is thoroughly familiar with laparoscopy the neoplastic characteristics of gastric GISTs (12). A special care has to be taken to prevent peritoneal seeding and possibility of capsular rupture during manipulation. Thus the size of tumor represents negative prognostic factor, and resection with free margins is curative predictor with good prognosis (12).

4. CONCLUSION

With this case report we demonstrate that laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe and follows all the principles needed for good oncological outcome with all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery even for GISTs that are larger than 2 cm.
  12 in total

1.  Fine-needle aspiration cytology and immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of 24 gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a quick, reliable diagnostic method.

Authors:  Maria D Lozano; J Rodriguez; Salvador Martín Algarra; Angel Panizo; Jesús J Sola; Javier Pardo
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.582

Review 2.  Endoluminal gastric surgery: the modern era of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Laparoscopic vs open resection of gastric stromal tumors.

Authors:  B D Matthews; R M Walsh; K W Kercher; R F Sing; B L Pratt; G A Answini; B T Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Consensus meeting for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Report of the GIST Consensus Conference of 20-21 March 2004, under the auspices of ESMO.

Authors:  J-Y Blay; S Bonvalot; P Casali; H Choi; M Debiec-Richter; A P Dei Tos; J-F Emile; A Gronchi; P C W Hogendoorn; H Joensuu; A Le Cesne; J McClure; J Mac Clure; J Maurel; N Nupponen; I Ray-Coquard; P Reichardt; R Sciot; S Stroobants; M van Glabbeke; A van Oosterom; G D Demetri
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Gastric GI stromal tumors (GISTs): the role of surgery in the era of targeted therapy.

Authors:  Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 6.  Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of outcome with respect to surgical margins and technique.

Authors:  Marc Everett; Haim Gutman
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in Japan: English version.

Authors:  Toshirou Nishida; Seiichi Hirota; Akio Yanagisawa; Yoshinori Sugino; Manabu Minami; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Yoshihide Otani; Yasuhiro Shimada; Fumiaki Takahashi; Tetsuro Kubota
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach: progresses in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  K De Vogelaere; M Aerts; P Haentjens; J De Grève; G Delvaux
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 9.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Yukihiko Kitamura
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and laparoscopic resection.

Authors:  Sanjoy Basu; Sam Balaji; David H Bennett; Nick Davies
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  1 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Treatment of Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: Finding Ways to Manage with Shorter Hospitalization Days.

Authors:  Sangjun Lee; Sa-Hong Min; Ki Bum Park; Dong-Wook Kim; Yoontaek Lee; Young Suk Park; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2019-09-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.