Literature DB >> 26261115

Challenges of interprofessional team training: a qualitative analysis of residents' perceptions.

Sandrijn van Schaik1, Jennifer Plant, Bridget O'Brien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based interprofessional team training is thought to improve patient care. Participating teams often consist of both experienced providers and trainees, which likely impacts team dynamics, particularly when a resident leads the team. Although similar team composition is found in real-life, debriefing after simulations puts a spotlight on team interactions and in particular on residents in the role of team leader. The goal of the current study was to explore residents' perceptions of simulation-based interprofessional team training.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a study of residents in the pediatric residency training program at the University of California, San Francisco (United States) leading interprofessional teams in simulated resuscitations, followed by facilitated debriefing. Residents participated in individual, semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews within one month of the simulation. The original study aimed to examine residents' self-assessment of leadership skills, and during analysis we encountered numerous comments regarding the interprofessional nature of the simulation training. We therefore performed a secondary analysis of the interview transcripts. We followed an iterative process to create a coding scheme, and used interprofessional learning and practice as sensitizing concepts to extract relevant themes.
RESULTS: 16 residents participated in the study. Residents felt that simulated resuscitations were helpful but anxiety provoking, largely due to interprofessional dynamics. They embraced the interprofessional training opportunity and appreciated hearing other healthcare providers' perspectives, but questioned the value of interprofessional debriefing. They identified the need to maintain positive relationships with colleagues in light of the teams' complex hierarchy as a barrier to candid feedback. DISCUSSION: Pediatric residents in our study appreciated the opportunity to participate in interprofessional team training but were conflicted about the value of feedback and debriefing in this setting. These data indicate that the optimal approach to such interprofessional education activities deserves further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26261115     DOI: 10.4103/1357-6283.161883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Health (Abingdon)        ISSN: 1357-6283


  7 in total

1.  Debriefing strategies for interprofessional simulation-a qualitative study.

Authors:  Catherine Holmes; Edward Mellanby
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-18

2.  From ideal to real: a qualitative study of the implementation of in situ interprofessional simulation-based education.

Authors:  Mindy Ju; Naike Bochatay; Kathryn Robertson; James Frank; Bridget O'Brien; Sandrijn van Schaik
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Faculty attitudes about interprofessional education.

Authors:  Gary L Beck Dallaghan; Erin Hoffman; Elizabeth Lyden; Catherine Bevil
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-06-27

4.  "No patient should die of PPH just for the lack of training!" Experiences from multi-professional simulation training on postpartum hemorrhage in northern Tanzania: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Signe Egenberg; Bjørg Karlsen; Deodatus Massay; Happiness Kimaro; Lars Edvin Bru
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Interprofessional learning in social and health care-Learning experiences from large-group simulation in Finland.

Authors:  Terhi Saaranen; Marja Silén-Lipponen; Maria Palkolahti; Kaarina Mönkkönen; Miia Tiihonen; Marjorita Sormunen
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-08-05

6.  Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care.

Authors:  Charlotte Weiner; Pernilla Pergert; Bert Molewijk; Anders Castor; Cecilia Bartholdson
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 7.  Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review.

Authors:  Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Karen Mattick; Mark Pearson; Nicola Brennan; Simon Briscoe; Geoff Wong
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.790

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.