Literature DB >> 26260938

Interpretation of the p value: A national survey study in academic psychologists from Spain.

Laura Badenes-Ribera1, Dolores Frías-Navarro, Héctor Monterde-i-Bort, Marcos Pascual-Soler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incorrect interpretations of p values affect professionals’ decisions and jeopardize the quality of psychological interventions and the accumulation of valid scientific knowledge. This study analyzes the errors made by Spanish academic psychologists in interpreting p values.
METHOD: We surveyed academic psychologists about their interpretations of p values. The sample is composed of 418 academic psychologists from Spanish public universities. The mean number of years working as a university professor is 14.16 (SD = 9.39).
RESULTS: Our findings suggest that many academic psychologists do not know how to correctly interpret p values. The inverse probability fallacy presents the greatest comprehension problems. Methodology instructors also interpret the significance of the p value erroneously.
CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the importance of the statistical re-education of professors.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26260938     DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2014.283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psicothema        ISSN: 0214-9915


  10 in total

1.  Are the fallacies of the P value finally ended?

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Andrea Viti; Alberto Terzi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Logical fallacies in animal model research.

Authors:  Espen A Sjoberg
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.759

3.  Perceived Statistical Knowledge Level and Self-Reported Statistical Practice Among Academic Psychologists.

Authors:  Laura Badenes-Ribera; Dolores Frias-Navarro; Nathalie O Iotti; Amparo Bonilla-Campos; Claudio Longobardi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-22

4.  Concise, Simple, and Not Wrong: In Search of a Short-Hand Interpretation of Statistical Significance.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Spence; David J Stanley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-13

5.  How feasible is it to abandon statistical significance? A reflection based on a short survey.

Authors:  Fredi Alexander Diaz-Quijano; Fernando Morelli Calixto; José Mário Nunes da Silva
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Is the p-value properly interpreted by critical care professionals? Online survey.

Authors:  Mauro Federico Andreu; Ladislao Pablo Diaz Ballve; Daniel Héctor Verdecchia; Agustina Maria Monzón; Tatiana Dias de Carvalho
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

7.  A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity.

Authors:  Duta Liana; Fatma Lestari; Sutoto Sutoto; Robiana Modjo; Adang Bachtiar
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2022-03-10

8.  Misinterpretations of P-values and statistical tests persists among researchers and professionals working with statistics and epidemiology.

Authors:  Per Lytsy; Mikael Hartman; Ronnie Pingel
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.646

9.  Answering research questions without calculating the mean.

Authors:  Guillermo Campitelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08

10.  Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists.

Authors:  Laura Badenes-Ribera; Dolores Frias-Navarro; Bryan Iotti; Amparo Bonilla-Campos; Claudio Longobardi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.