Literature DB >> 26260684

The significance of Hox gene collinearity.

Stephen J Gaunt1.   

Abstract

Arthropods and vertebrates inherited their Hox clusters from an ancestral cluster of at least six genes already present in their last common ancestor, Urbilateria. Clustering and a common transcriptional direction are both likely features of the way that the gene complex first arose in a process of tandem gene duplication. Spatial collinearity (correspondence between ordering of Hox genes along the chromosome and their expression patterns along the head-tail axis) has been conserved in many animal groups and is likely to have been already present in Urbilateria. It is not known why the Hox cluster evolved with spatial collinearity. Four models are discussed. These vary in the significance they place upon Hox chromatin structure, and also on whether they propose that collinearity is primarily concerned with establishment or maintenance of Hox expression. Published proposals to explain spatial collinearity, which invoke enhancer sharing, chromatin closing or chromatin opening, are either problematic or can offer only partial explanations. In an alternative proposal it is suggested here that spatial collinearity evolved principally to maximise physical segregation, and thereby minimise incidence of boundaries, between active and inactive genes within the Hox cluster. This is to minimise erroneous transfer of transcriptional activity, or inactivity, between adjacent Hox genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26260684     DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.150223sg

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dev Biol        ISSN: 0214-6282            Impact factor:   2.203


  12 in total

1.  Identification of HOX signatures contributing to oral cancer phenotype.

Authors:  Kanaka Sai Ram Padam; Richard Morgan; Keith Hunter; Sanjiban Chakrabarty; Naveena A N Kumar; Raghu Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Spatially and Temporally Distributed Complexity-A Refreshed Framework for the Study of GRN Evolution.

Authors:  Alessandro Minelli; Alberto Valero-Gracia
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 3.  Theories, laws, and models in evo-devo.

Authors:  Michael K Richardson
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Reorganisation of Hoxd regulatory landscapes during the evolution of a snake-like body plan.

Authors:  Isabel Guerreiro; Sandra Gitto; Ana Novoa; Julien Codourey; Thi Hanh Nguyen Huynh; Federico Gonzalez; Michel C Milinkovitch; Moises Mallo; Denis Duboule
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Embryonic timing, axial stem cells, chromatin dynamics, and the Hox clock.

Authors:  Jacqueline Deschamps; Denis Duboule
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  The Most Developmentally Truncated Fishes Show Extensive Hox Gene Loss and Miniaturized Genomes.

Authors:  Martin Malmstrøm; Ralf Britz; Michael Matschiner; Ole K Tørresen; Renny Kurnia Hadiaty; Norsham Yaakob; Heok Hui Tan; Kjetill Sigurd Jakobsen; Walter Salzburger; Lukas Rüber
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Hox genes regulate asexual reproductive behavior and tissue segmentation in adult animals.

Authors:  Christopher P Arnold; Analí Migueles Lozano; Frederick G Mann; Stephanie H Nowotarski; Julianna O Haug; Jeffrey J Lange; Chris W Seidel; Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  HOXA13 in etiology and oncogenic potential of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Vincent T Janmaat; Kateryna Nesteruk; Manon C W Spaander; Auke P Verhaar; Bingting Yu; Rodrigo A Silva; Wayne A Phillips; Marcin Magierowski; Anouk van de Winkel; H Scott Stadler; Tatiana Sandoval-Guzmán; Luc J W van der Laan; Ernst J Kuipers; Ron Smits; Marco J Bruno; Gwenny M Fuhler; Nicholas J Clemons; Maikel P Peppelenbosch
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  A Complex Structural Variation on Chromosome 27 Leads to the Ectopic Expression of HOXB8 and the Muffs and Beard Phenotype in Chickens.

Authors:  Ying Guo; Xiaorong Gu; Zheya Sheng; Yanqiang Wang; Chenglong Luo; Ranran Liu; Hao Qu; Dingming Shu; Jie Wen; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Örjan Carlborg; Yiqiang Zhao; Xiaoxiang Hu; Ning Li
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The Hematopoietic TALE-Code Shows Normal Activity of IRX1 in Myeloid Progenitors and Reveals Ectopic Expression of IRX3 and IRX5 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Stefan Nagel; Claudia Pommerenke; Corinna Meyer; Roderick A F MacLeod
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.