Literature DB >> 26259664

Prognostic Factors and Clinical Characteristics for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Benign Enlarged Perihepatic Lymph Nodes: a Single-Center Experience from China.

Fei Tian1, Jian-Xiong Wu2, Wei-Bo Yu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical and prognostic significance of benign perihepatic lymph nodes enlargement (PLNE) from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relative frequency, incidence and locations of benign PLNE, and the impact on long-term survival of the patients.
METHODS: A total of 219 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection of HCC between July 2006 and March 2012 in our single institution were divided into two groups according to the presence of PLNE: PLNE group (n = 76), and control group (n = 143). The long-term outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 77.2, 60.0, and 38.1 % in the PLNE group and 71.3, 42.5, and 25.0 % in the control group (p = 0.080). Corresponding overall survival rates were 96.0, 84.8, 67.1 % and 93.5, 72.4, 46.9 % respectively (p = 0.041). Patients with benign PLNE were associated with a higher rate of centrally located HCCs or tumors adjacent to the major branch of vascular vessels. Multivariate analysis revealed that benign PLNE was an independent positive prognostic factor affecting the overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our analysis, patients of HCC with benign PLNE after curative resection can be expected to have better long-term survival. It is also associated with a lower risk of tumor recurrence, but not significant. This finding may provide new insights into daily clinical practice and the pathophysiological characteristics of HCC development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; Perihepatic lymph node enlargement; Prognosis; Recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26259664     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2900-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  31 in total

1.  A new prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma based on total tumor volume: the Taipei Integrated Scoring System.

Authors:  Chia-Yang Hsu; Yi-Hsiang Huang; Cheng-Yuan Hsia; Chien-Wei Su; Han-Chieh Lin; Che-Chuan Loong; Yi-You Chiou; Jen-Huey Chiang; Pui-Ching Lee; Teh-Ia Huo; Shou-Dong Lee
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies.

Authors:  H A EDMONDSON; P E STEINER
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1954-05       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Potential associations between perihepatic lymph node enlargement and liver fibrosis, hepatocellular injury or hepatocarcinogenesis in chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

Authors:  Masaya Sato; Hiromi Hikita; Shu Hagiwara; Mamiko Sato; Yoko Soroida; Atsushi Suzuki; Hiroaki Gotoh; Tomomi Iwai; Soichi Kojima; Tomokazu Matsuura; Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi; Kazuhiko Koike; Yutaka Yatomi; Hitoshi Ikeda
Journal:  Hepatol Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.288

4.  Ultrasound detection of abdominal lymphadenomegaly in subjects with hepatitis C virus infection and persistently normal transaminases: a predictive index of liver histology severity.

Authors:  M Soresi; A Carroccio; G Bonfissuto; V Agate; C Magliarisi; F Aragona; M Levrero; A Notarbartolo; G Montalto
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 5.  Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis.

Authors:  K Ishak; A Baptista; L Bianchi; F Callea; J De Groote; F Gudat; H Denk; V Desmet; G Korb; R N MacSween
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 25.083

6.  Outcome after partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular cancer within the Milan criteria.

Authors:  S T Fan; R T P Poon; C Yeung; C M Lam; C M Lo; W K Yuen; K K C Ng; C L Liu; S C Chan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Differential diagnosis between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes using DW-MRI: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Min Zhou; Bin Lu; Gang Lv; Qin Tang; Jibiao Zhu; Jun Li; Kaide Shi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  R1 hepatectomy with exposure of tumor surface for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Weibo Yu; Weiqi Rong; Liming Wang; Fan Wu; Quan Xu; Jianxiong Wu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Long-term outcomes after curative resection for patients with macroscopically solitary hepatocellular carcinoma without macrovascular invasion and an analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Shu-Hong Li; Wei Wei; Rong-Ping Guo; Ming Shi; Zhi-Xing Guo; Zhi-Yuan Chen; Cheng-Zuo Xiao; Mu-Yan Cai; Lie Zheng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Outcomes of hepatic resection for a single large hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Beom Cho; Kuhn Uk Lee; Hae Won Lee; Eung-Ho Cho; Sung-Hoon Yang; Jai Young Cho; Nam-Joon Yi; Kyung-Suk Suh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Management of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: Update 2016.

Authors:  Wei-Bo Yu; Andrew Rao; Victor Vu; Lily Xu; Jian-Yu Rao; Jian-Xiong Wu
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-05-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.