Nicolasine D Niemeijer1, Thomas G Papathomas1, Esther Korpershoek1, Ronald R de Krijger1, Lindsey Oudijk1, Hans Morreau1, Jean-Pierre Bayley1, Frederik J Hes1, Jeroen C Jansen1, Winand N M Dinjens1, Eleonora P M Corssmit1. 1. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases (N.D.N., E.P.M.C.), Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology (T.G.P., E.K., L.O., W.N.M.D., R.R.d.K.) Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology (R.R.d.K.), Reinier de Graaf Hospital, 2625 AD Delft, The Netherlands; and Departments of Pathology (H.M.), Human Genetics (J.P.B.), Clinical Genetics (F.J.H.), and Otorhinolaryngology (J.C.J.), Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Mutations in genes encoding the subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) can lead to pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma formation. However, SDH mutations have also been linked to nonparaganglionic tumors. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate which nonparaganglionic tumors belong to the SDH-associated tumor spectrum. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The setting was a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients included all consecutive SDHA/SDHB/SDHC and SDHD mutation carriers followed at the Department of Endocrinology of the Leiden University Medical Center who were affected by non-pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma solid tumors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were SDHA/SDHB immunohistochemistry, mutation analysis, and loss of heterozygosity analysis of the involved SDH-encoding genes. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 35 tumors (from 26 patients) showed positive staining on SDHB and SDHA immunohistochemistry. Eight tumors showed negative staining for SDHB and positive staining for SDHA: a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, a macroprolactinoma, two gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors, an abdominal ganglioneuroma, and three renal cell carcinomas. With the exception of the abdominal ganglioneuroma, loss of heterozygosity was detected in all tumors. A prolactinoma in a patient with a germline SDHA mutation was the only tumor immunonegative for both SDHA and SDHB. Sanger sequencing of this tumor revealed a somatic mutation (p.D38V) as a likely second hit leading to biallelic inactivation of SDHA. One tumor (breast cancer) showed heterogeneous SDHB staining, positive SDHA staining, and retention of heterozygosity. CONCLUSIONS: This study strengthens the etiological association of SDH genes with pituitary neoplasia, renal tumorigenesis, and gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Furthermore, our results indicate that pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor also falls within the SDH-related tumor spectrum.
CONTEXT: Mutations in genes encoding the subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) can lead to pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma formation. However, SDH mutations have also been linked to nonparaganglionic tumors. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate which nonparaganglionic tumors belong to the SDH-associated tumor spectrum. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The setting was a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients included all consecutive SDHA/SDHB/SDHC and SDHD mutation carriers followed at the Department of Endocrinology of the Leiden University Medical Center who were affected by non-pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma solid tumors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were SDHA/SDHB immunohistochemistry, mutation analysis, and loss of heterozygosity analysis of the involved SDH-encoding genes. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 35 tumors (from 26 patients) showed positive staining on SDHB and SDHA immunohistochemistry. Eight tumors showed negative staining for SDHB and positive staining for SDHA: a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, a macroprolactinoma, two gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors, an abdominal ganglioneuroma, and three renal cell carcinomas. With the exception of the abdominal ganglioneuroma, loss of heterozygosity was detected in all tumors. A prolactinoma in a patient with a germline SDHA mutation was the only tumor immunonegative for both SDHA and SDHB. Sanger sequencing of this tumor revealed a somatic mutation (p.D38V) as a likely second hit leading to biallelic inactivation of SDHA. One tumor (breast cancer) showed heterogeneous SDHB staining, positive SDHA staining, and retention of heterozygosity. CONCLUSIONS: This study strengthens the etiological association of SDH genes with pituitary neoplasia, renal tumorigenesis, and gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Furthermore, our results indicate that pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor also falls within the SDH-related tumor spectrum.
Authors: Amber E Bannon; Jason Kent; Isaac Forquer; Ajia Town; Lillian R Klug; Kelly McCann; Carol Beadling; Oliver Harismendy; Jason K Sicklick; Christopher Corless; Ujwal Shinde; Michael C Heinrich Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paraskevi Xekouki; Ana Brennand; Ben Whitelaw; Karel Pacak; Constantine A Stratakis Journal: Horm Metab Res Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 2.936