Literature DB >> 26259075

The 8 basic payment methods in health care.

Kevin Quinn.   

Abstract

Eight basic payment methods are applicable across all types of health care. Each method is defined by the unit of payment (per time period, beneficiary, recipient, episode, day, service, dollar of cost, or dollar of charges). These methods are more specific than common terms, such as capitation, fee for service, global payment, and cost reimbursement. They also correspond to the division of financial risk between payer and provider, with each method reflecting a risk factor within the health care spending identity. Financial risk gradually shifts from being primarily on providers when payment is per time period to being primarily on payers when payment is per dollar of charges. Method 4 (per episode) marks the line between epidemiologic and treatment risk. The 8 methods are typically combined to balance risk and thus balance incentives between payers and providers. This taxonomy makes it easier to understand trends in payment reform-especially the shifting division of financial risk and the movement toward value-based purchasing-and types of payment reform, such as bundling, accountable care organizations, medical homes, and cost sharing. The taxonomy also enables prediction of conflicts between payers and providers. For each unit of payment, providers are rewarded for increasing units while decreasing their own cost per unit. No payment method is neutral on quality because each encourages and discourages the provision of care overall and in particular situations. Many professional norms and business practices have been established to mitigate undesirable incentives. Health care differs from many other industries in that the unit of payment remains variable and unsettled.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26259075     DOI: 10.7326/M14-2784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  8 in total

1.  Impact of Inpatient Palliative Care on Treatment Intensity for Patients with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Jay R Horton; R Sean Morrison; Elizabeth Capezuti; Jennifer Hill; Eric J Lee; Amy S Kelley
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Utilization and Outcomes for Spine Surgery in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Bruce E Landon; John Matelski; Vicki Ling; Anthony V Perruccio; J Michael Paterson; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  The Effect of Network-Level Payment Models on Care Network Performance: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Reindersma; Sandra Sülz; Kees Ahaus; Isabelle Fabbricotti
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.120

4.  The effects of diagnosis-related groups payment on hospital healthcare in China: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kun Zou; Hong-Ying Li; Die Zhou; Zai-Jun Liao
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Value-based care in obstetrics: comparison between vaginal birth and caesarean section.

Authors:  Romulo Negrini; Raquel Domingues da Silva Ferreira; Daniela Zaros Guimarães
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Is value-based payment for healthcare feasible under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme?

Authors:  Yussif Issahaku; Andrea Thoumi; Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro; Osondu Ogbouji; Justice Nonvignon
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2021-12-11

7.  Integrated Payment, Fragmented Realities? A Discourse Analysis of Integrated Payment in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Thomas Reindersma; Isabelle Fabbricotti; Kees Ahaus; Sandra Sülz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Thinking About Clinical Outcomes in Medicaid.

Authors:  Kevin Quinn; Dawn Weimar; Jeffrey Gray; Bud Davies
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.