GOAL: Whole-exome sequencing provides a more cost-effective way than whole-genome sequencing for detecting genetic variants, such as copy number variations (CNVs). Although a number of approaches have been proposed to detect CNVs from whole-genome sequencing, a direct adoption of these approaches to whole-exome sequencing will often fail because exons are separately located along a genome. Therefore, an appropriate method is needed to target the specific features of exome sequencing data. METHODS: In this paper, a novel sparse model based method is proposed to discover CNVs from multiple exome sequencing data. First, exome sequencing data are represented with a penalized matrix approximation, and technical variability and random sequencing errors are assumed to follow a generalized Gaussian distribution. Second, an iteratively reweighted least squares algorithm is used to estimate the solution. RESULTS: The method is tested and validated on both synthetic and real data, and compared with other approaches including CoNIFER, XHMM, and cn.MOPS. The test demonstrates that the proposed method outperform other approaches. CONCLUSION: The proposed sparse model can detect CNVs from exome sequencing data with high power and precision. Significance: Sparse model can target the specific features of exome sequencing data. The software codes are freely available at http://www.tulane.edu/ wyp/software/Exon_CNV.m.
GOAL: Whole-exome sequencing provides a more cost-effective way than whole-genome sequencing for detecting genetic variants, such as copy number variations (CNVs). Although a number of approaches have been proposed to detect CNVs from whole-genome sequencing, a direct adoption of these approaches to whole-exome sequencing will often fail because exons are separately located along a genome. Therefore, an appropriate method is needed to target the specific features of exome sequencing data. METHODS: In this paper, a novel sparse model based method is proposed to discover CNVs from multiple exome sequencing data. First, exome sequencing data are represented with a penalized matrix approximation, and technical variability and random sequencing errors are assumed to follow a generalized Gaussian distribution. Second, an iteratively reweighted least squares algorithm is used to estimate the solution. RESULTS: The method is tested and validated on both synthetic and real data, and compared with other approaches including CoNIFER, XHMM, and cn.MOPS. The test demonstrates that the proposed method outperform other approaches. CONCLUSION: The proposed sparse model can detect CNVs from exome sequencing data with high power and precision. Significance: Sparse model can target the specific features of exome sequencing data. The software codes are freely available at http://www.tulane.edu/ wyp/software/Exon_CNV.m.
Authors: Jarupon Fah Sathirapongsasuti; Hane Lee; Basil A J Horst; Georg Brunner; Alistair J Cochran; Scott Binder; John Quackenbush; Stanley F Nelson Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Michael I Love; Alena Myšičková; Ruping Sun; Vera Kalscheuer; Martin Vingron; Stefan A Haas Journal: Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol Date: 2011-11-08
Authors: Jacob A Tennessen; Abigail W Bigham; Timothy D O'Connor; Wenqing Fu; Eimear E Kenny; Simon Gravel; Sean McGee; Ron Do; Xiaoming Liu; Goo Jun; Hyun Min Kang; Daniel Jordan; Suzanne M Leal; Stacey Gabriel; Mark J Rieder; Goncalo Abecasis; David Altshuler; Deborah A Nickerson; Eric Boerwinkle; Shamil Sunyaev; Carlos D Bustamante; Michael J Bamshad; Joshua M Akey Journal: Science Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jonathan Sebat; B Lakshmi; Dheeraj Malhotra; Jennifer Troge; Christa Lese-Martin; Tom Walsh; Boris Yamrom; Seungtai Yoon; Alex Krasnitz; Jude Kendall; Anthony Leotta; Deepa Pai; Ray Zhang; Yoon-Ha Lee; James Hicks; Sarah J Spence; Annette T Lee; Kaija Puura; Terho Lehtimäki; David Ledbetter; Peter K Gregersen; Joel Bregman; James S Sutcliffe; Vaidehi Jobanputra; Wendy Chung; Dorothy Warburton; Mary-Claire King; David Skuse; Daniel H Geschwind; T Conrad Gilliam; Kenny Ye; Michael Wigler Journal: Science Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Niklas Krumm; Peter H Sudmant; Arthur Ko; Brian J O'Roak; Maika Malig; Bradley P Coe; Aaron R Quinlan; Deborah A Nickerson; Evan E Eichler Journal: Genome Res Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Hreinn Stefansson; Dan Rujescu; Sven Cichon; Olli P H Pietiläinen; Andres Ingason; Stacy Steinberg; Ragnheidur Fossdal; Engilbert Sigurdsson; Thordur Sigmundsson; Jacobine E Buizer-Voskamp; Thomas Hansen; Klaus D Jakobsen; Pierandrea Muglia; Clyde Francks; Paul M Matthews; Arnaldur Gylfason; Bjarni V Halldorsson; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Thorgeir E Thorgeirsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Adalbjorg Jonasdottir; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Asgeir Bjornsson; Sigurborg Mattiasdottir; Thorarinn Blondal; Magnus Haraldsson; Brynja B Magnusdottir; Ina Giegling; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Annette Hartmann; Kevin V Shianna; Dongliang Ge; Anna C Need; Caroline Crombie; Gillian Fraser; Nicholas Walker; Jouko Lonnqvist; Jaana Suvisaari; Annamarie Tuulio-Henriksson; Tiina Paunio; Timi Toulopoulou; Elvira Bramon; Marta Di Forti; Robin Murray; Mirella Ruggeri; Evangelos Vassos; Sarah Tosato; Muriel Walshe; Tao Li; Catalina Vasilescu; Thomas W Mühleisen; August G Wang; Henrik Ullum; Srdjan Djurovic; Ingrid Melle; Jes Olesen; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Barbara Franke; Chiara Sabatti; Nelson B Freimer; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Augustine Kong; Ole A Andreassen; Roel A Ophoff; Alexander Georgi; Marcella Rietschel; Thomas Werge; Hannes Petursson; David B Goldstein; Markus M Nöthen; Leena Peltonen; David A Collier; David St Clair; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nature Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 49.962