Literature DB >> 26258724

Utilization of stress echocardiography in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Vikram Agarwal1, Siu-Sun Yao, Farooq A Chaudhry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of stress echocardiography in the risk stratification and prognosis of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: Stress echocardiography is an established technique for diagnosis, risk stratification, and prognosis of patients with known or suspected CAD.
METHODS: We evaluated 409 patients (65 ± 10 years; 63% men) referred for stress echocardiography (45% treadmill, 55% dobutamine), who underwent stress echocardiography and coronary angiography within 3 months. All patients had multivessel CAD as defined by coronary stenosis (≥50% left main or ≥70% in two or more major epicardial vessels or branches). The left ventricle was divided into 16 segments and was scored on a five-point scale of wall motion. Patients with abnormal results on stress echocardiography were defined as those with stress-induced ischemia (increase in wall motion score of ≥1 grade).
RESULTS: Follow-up (3.1 ± 1.3 years) for nonfatal myocardial infarction (n = 35) and cardiac death (n = 25) was obtained. In patients with multivessel CAD, stress echocardiography effectively risk-stratified normal (no ischemia, n = 83) vs. abnormal (ischemia, n = 326) groups for cardiac events (event rate 1.9 vs. 5.4%/year; P < 0.01). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression model identified stress-induced ischemia (hazard ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval 1.9-15.9, P = 0.002) as the most significant predictor of adverse cardiac events. A stepwise Cox proportional-hazards model demonstrated significant incremental prognostic value of stress echocardiography over clinical variables, stress electrocardiography and resting left ventricular function (P < 0.0001), with the highest global chi-square value.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with angiographically significant multivessel CAD, despite normal-stress echocardiography, there was an intermediate cardiac event rate (1.9%/year); abnormal-stress echocardiography identified a high-risk group (5.4%/year); and stress echocardiography provided incremental prognostic value for risk stratification and prediction of cardiac events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26258724     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  3 in total

1.  Left main disease diagnosis: The Achilles heel or the great strength of modern cardiac imaging?

Authors:  Aiden Abidov
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Clinical outcomes of discordant exercise electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings compared with concordant findings in patients with chest pain and no history of coronary artery disease: An observational study.

Authors:  Hui-Jeong Hwang; Il Suk Sohn; Chang-Bum Park; Eun-Sun Jin; Jin-Man Cho; Chong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Safety and efficacy of physiologist-led dobutamine stress echocardiography

Authors:  Keith Pearce; John Chambers
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2018-12-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.