Literature DB >> 26258619

[Complications after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement - A Retrospective Analysis].

A Jafari1, T J Weismüller2, T Tonguc1, J C Kalff1, S Manekeller1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition is vital for patients with inadequate or absent oral food intake, as it can help to avoid catabolic metabolism. Enteral feeding can be secured by placing a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG-tube) which is an approved method. Several clinical studies could verify the superiority of this procedure compared to other options. Even though PEG-tube placement is regarded as less invasive surgery, a considerable rate of complications is reported in literature. MATERIAL/
METHODS: Here, we report a retrospective analysis of PEG-tube placements in the Bonn University Hospital from January 2005 to December 2012.
RESULTS: Overall, 641 PEG-tubes were placed with a complication rate of 9.4 %, which can be further divided in 5.5 % minor complications (mic) and 3.9 % major complications (mac). Two cases of death occurred in the context of PEG-tube placement. Endoscopically inserted PEG-tubes showed a complication rate of 8.6 % (4.8 % mic, 3.8 % mac). 63.2 % of mac consisted of perforations, 15.8 % of intra-abdominal abscesses and 15.8 % of buried bumper syndromes. The complication rate of CT-guided placement of PEG-tubes was 38.9 % (27.8 % mic, 11.1 % mac). In this group, all mac were perforations. Surgical PEG-tube placement was accompanied by no mac and 7.7 % mic.
CONCLUSION: The amount of complications during PEG-tube placement is remarkable, therefore the indication of this procedure must be contemplated critically and careful follow-up is crucial. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26258619     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1557765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  3 in total

1.  A novel percutaneous magnetically guided gastrostomy technique without endoscopy or imaging guidance: a feasibility study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Eduardo Aimore Bonin; Paulo Roberto Walter Ferreira; Marcelo de Paula Loureiro; Thais Andrade Costa-Casagrande; Paolo de Oliveira Salvalaggio; Guilherme Francisco Gomes; Rafael William Noda; Christopher John Gostout; Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy - Too often? Too late? Who are the right patients for gastrostomy?

Authors:  Christoph G Dietrich; Konrad Schoppmeyer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Relationship of early acute complications and insertion site in push method percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Hiroshi Suzuki; Satoru Joshita; Tadanobu Nagaya; Koichi Sato; Akihiro Ito; Tomoaki Suga; Takeji Umemura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.