Literature DB >> 26258018

Custom made orthotic device for maintaining skull architecture during the postoperative period in infants undergoing craniosynostosis surgery.

Venu Gopal1, Praveen Ganesh1, Muralidhara Nagarjuna1, Kiran Kumar2, Samarth Shetty1, Paul C Salins1.   

Abstract

AIM: To fabricate a cost effective, indigenous and simple orthotics helmet for post-operative cranial molding in patients with craniosynostosis surgery.
METHODS: We present a case of 15 month old infant with secondary cranial vault deformity. Cranial vault remodeling surgery involving the posterior skull was planned and executed to increase the posterior gap, so that brain growth would be facilitated towards this empty space. Materials such as thermoplastic sponge, thermoplastic ionomer resin sheet, soft sponge and Velcro straps are used to fabricate a cranial orthotics helmet.
RESULTS: We have successfully used the above materials to fabricate the orthotics helmet for post-operative cranial molding.
CONCLUSION: The technique described in this article is simple and cost effective. It can be custom made according to the demands of the surgical technique and the type of synostosis. It favors an individualistic prognosis, and proves worthwhile as every synostosis requires a unique treatment plan. It is an excellent adjuvant to craniosynostosis remodeling surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Craniectomy; Craniosynostosis; Head moulage

Year:  2015        PMID: 26258018      PMCID: PMC4523588          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  18 in total

1.  Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  R I Aviv; E Rodger; C M Hall
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Effect of molding helmet on head shape in nonsurgically treated sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Sandeep Sood; Arlene Rozzelle; Blerina Shaqiri; Natasha Sood; Steven D Ham
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Long-term developmental outcomes in patients with deformational plagiocephaly.

Authors:  R I Miller; S K Clarren
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Intentional cranial deformation: a disappearing form of self-mutilation.

Authors:  P C Gerszten; E Gerszten
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  External cranioplasty: historical perspectives.

Authors:  L S Nichter; J A Persing; J H Horowitz; R F Morgan; M A Nichter; M T Edgerton
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Importance of early recognition and treatment of deformational plagiocephaly with orthotic cranioplasty.

Authors:  K M Kelly; T R Littlefield; J K Pomatto; C E Ripley; S P Beals; E F Joganic
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1999-03

7.  Structural, mechanical, and material properties of fetal cranial bone.

Authors:  T J Kriewall
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Endoscopic craniectomy for early correction of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  C M Barone; D F Jimenez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Assessing asymmetrical infant head shapes.

Authors:  Cathy C Cartwright
Journal:  Nurse Pract       Date:  2002-08

10.  Endoscopic cranial suture release for the treatment of craniosynostosis--is it the future?

Authors:  Mark R Proctor
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.