Literature DB >> 26257942

Porous polymer monolithic columns with gold nanoparticles as an intermediate ligand for the separation of proteins in reverse phase-ion exchange mixed mode.

Lydia Terborg1, Jorge C Masini2, Michelle Lin3, Katriina Lipponen4, Marja-Liisa Riekolla4, Frantisek Svec1.   

Abstract

A new approach has been developed for the preparation of mixed-mode stationary phases to separate proteins. The pore surface of monolithic poly(glycidyl methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethacrylate) capillary columns was functionalized with thiols and coated with gold nanoparticles. The final mixed mode surface chemistry was formed by attaching, in a single step, alkanethiols, mercaptoalkanoic acids, and their mixtures on the free surface of attached gold nanoparticles. Use of these mixtures allowed fine tuning of the hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance. The amount of attached gold nanoparticles according to thermal gravimetric analysis was 44.8 wt.%. This value together with results of frontal elution enabled calculation of surface coverage with the alkanethiol and mercaptoalkanoic acid ligands. Interestingly, alkanethiols coverage in a range of 4.46-4.51 molecules/nm(2) significantly exceeded that of mercaptoalkanoic acids with 2.39-2.45 molecules/nm(2). The mixed mode character of these monolithic stationary phases was for the first time demonstrated in the separations of proteins that could be achieved in the same column using gradient elution conditions typical of reverse phase (using gradient of acetonitrile in water) and ion exchange chromatographic modes (applying gradient of salt in water), respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gold nanoparticles; Mixed mode; Monolith; Proteins; Separation

Year:  2014        PMID: 26257942      PMCID: PMC4522539          DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2014.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Res        ISSN: 2090-1224            Impact factor:   10.479


Introduction

Mixed-mode chromatography refers to chromatographic methods that utilize more than one type of interaction between the stationary phase and analytes in order to achieve their separation [1,2]. While early chromatographic methods preferred stationary phases with a strictly singular functionality, packings accommodating a plurality of functionalities turned out to be very useful. They support simultaneous interactions of various types, thus enabling the retention and separation of a multiplicity of compounds in a single run. This advantage of mixed-mode packings over single mode separation media caught attention of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. As a result, mixed-mode chromatography became a popular tool in quality control and downstream processing, and a number of mixed mode columns combining reversed phase, hydrophobic interaction, hydrophilic interaction, and different ion exchange mechanisms are now available from industrial sources. Mixed-mode chromatography, including both reverse phase and ion exchange mechanisms, has been known for 20 years [3]. The separation of analytes is achieved through the differences in the hydrophobicity and charge of the separated species. The early mixed-mode approaches were achieved by mixing two types of particulate separation media, each with a single chemistry, and packing the mixture into a column. Alternatively, silica with reduced coverage of hydrophobic ligands that still contained free uncapped acidic silanols, i.e. mixed two different ligands in a single packing, was also used. More sophisticated stationary phases were prepared using molecules that contain ion exchange functionality as a part of the hydrophobic ligand. Depending on the position of the ionizable functionality with respect to the pore surface, these phases can be “embedded”, i.e. the functionality is close to the surface and the hydrophobic chain extends in a mobile phase environment, or “tipped” with the functionality at the free end of the hydrophobic chain. These stationary phases excel in reproducibility since their chemistry is defined by the attached molecule, not by the preparation process. The chemistry of all current mixed mode columns is given and once the column is available it cannot be changed. Also, optimizing the column chemistry is a tedious process since it always requires several synthetic steps. Sulfur containing functionalities are known to strongly interact with noble metals and this property is widely used in analytical chemistry [4-6]. For example, several authors have demonstrated this fact with the placement of gold and silver nanoparticles on the pore surface of polymer-based monolithic supports that are then functionalized with thiols [7-16]. In contrast to porous beads with a maximum pore size typically in the range of low tens of nanometers, monolithic columns feature large through pores, with sizes reaching hundreds of nanometers or even single micrometers. Therefore, the monolithic structures are an ideal support for immobilization of nanoparticles without affecting the permeability for the flow. For example, 15 nm gold nanoparticles covering a pore with a size of 800 nm decrease the pore cross section by less than 4%. The large pores also enable convectional mass transfer of large molecules to the interacting site that is much faster than diffusion through the stagnant mobile phase in pores enabling mass transport within beads. Therefore, porous polymer monoliths are almost ideal stationary phase for the rapid separation of proteins. Our recent studies [7,8,11,12,14] demonstrated that pores of polymer monoliths functionalized with thiol groups can be coated with an almost continuous layer of gold nanoparticles. The simultaneous interaction of the gold nanoparticles with multiple thiol groups on the pore surface is the reason for the high stability of their attachment [7]. However, no matter how many of these attaching interactions occur, for sterical reasons they always occupy only a small fraction of the external surface area of the nanoparticle. The majority of the surface is then available for interactions with small molecules containing thiol groups. This feature makes immobilized gold nanoparticles excellent intermediate ligands that can be used coverage with compounds allowing wide variations in the surface chemistry. In addition, the interaction with a single thiol group is weak enough to enable its stripping and replacing with a different thiol containing molecule. Thus, the chemistry of a single column containing the gold nanoparticles can be changed at any time [8]. To date, all applications where the gold nanoparticles have served as the intermediate ligand were demonstrated with the immobilization of a single type of thiol molecules forming a homogeneous surface chemistry. In this paper, we present a different approach that extends our previous published work [12]. Our new method facilitates the creation of monolithic columns for mixed mode chromatographic separation of proteins since it permits the functionalization with two different chemistries at the same time. This approach entails the simultaneous attachment of hydrophobic and ionizable molecules on the gold nanoparticles immobilized at the pore surface of a monolith. The proportion of both components during functionalization enables fine tuning of polarity of the surface chemistry. Since the thiols are bound non-covalently, the proportions of the surface chemistries can be changed as needed always using the same column. Our new technique can simplify tailoring stationary phases for specific applications.

Experimental

Chemicals

Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and ethylene dimethacrylate (EDMA) monomers were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and purified by passing them through an aluminum oxide column for removal of the inhibitor. Azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN), cyclohexanol, 1-dodecanol, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, acetic acid, trifluoroacetic acid, cystamine dihydrochloride, propylamine, tris(2-carboxylethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP) solution (0.5 mol/L, pH = 7 adjusted with ammonium hydroxide), 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (TRIS), 1-octanethiol (C8), 1-dodecanethiol (C12), 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (11MUA), 8-mercaptooctanoic acid (8MOA), 2-diethylaminoethane-thiol hydrochloride (DAM), monobasic and dibasic sodium phosphates, and sodium chloride were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich in the highest quality available. The same vendor also provided the proteins: bovine serum albumin (BSA), lysozyme from chicken egg (LYZ), ribonuclease A from bovine pancreas (RNase A), hemoglobin from bovine blood (Hb), myoglobin from horse skeleton muscle (Mb) and cytochrome C from bovine heart (Cyt-C). The proteins were dissolved in water prior to chromatographic separation at concentrations ranging from 1.0 to 2.0 mg/mL. The gold nanoparticles (GNP) with a particle size of 15 nm were purchased from Ted Pella, Inc (Redding, CA, USA). HPLC-grade solvents (acetonitrile (ACN), acetone, methanol, and ethanol) were received from EMD Chemicals (Gibbstown, NJ, USA). Deionized water with 18.2 MΩ cm from a Barnstead Easypure II water purification system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used throughout this work. Polyimide coated fused silica capillaries with an inner diameter of 100 μm were purchased from Polymicro Technologies (Phoenix, AZ, USA).

Instrumentation

A syringe pump (Kd Scientific, New Hope, PA, USA) was used to pump both the polymerization mixture and the derivatization reagents through the capillary and monolith, respectively. The gold nanoparticles were pumped through the monolithic capillary columns using a high pressure 260D syringe pump (ISCO, Lincoln, NE, USA) equipped with a Rheodyne 7725 manual six-port sample injection valve (Rheodyne, Rohnert Park, CA) and a 2 mL loop to avoid contamination of the pump with GNP. A 1200 series nanoflow HPLC system from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a degasser, 80 nL UV detection flow cell, and an external microvalve injector with a 10 nL sample loop (Valco Instruments Co Inc., Schenkon, Switzerland) was used for the chromatographic evaluation. Reversed phase separations were carried out using a linear mobile phase gradient from 5 to 70 vol% acetonitrile in 0.1 vol% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid in 7.5 min at a flow rate of 2.0 μL/min and the peaks detected at 210 nm. A linear salt gradient of mobile phase composed of (A) 10 vol% ACN in phosphate buffer (pH 7) and (B) 0.5 mol/L NaCl in A was used for the separation in an ion exchange chromatographic mode. The gradient time from 100% A to 90 vol% B in A was 1 min at a flow rate 4 μL/min. An external injector with a 20 μL sample loop was used for the frontal analysis. The thiol solution with a concentration of 1–3 mol/L in ethanol was pumped through the system at a flow rate of 0.5 μL/min with ethanol as the pushing solvent and the breakthrough was detected at 210 nm. Scanning electron micrographs were obtained using a Zeiss Gemini Ultra Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (Peabody, MA, USA). The polymer monolith samples were sputtered with gold using the SCD 050 sputter coater (BAL-TEC AG, Balzers, Lichtenstein). The SEM system equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer from EDAX (Mahwah, NJ, USA) was used for elemental X-ray analysis. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using a Q5000IR from TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA) was carried out in a temperature range of 35–900 °C at a heating rate of 5 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere.

Determination of contents of gold and alkanethiols

TGA was applied for the determination of the gold content. All capillaries were cut to the same length with a weight of about 5 mg. The monolithic polymer decomposed at a temperature of about 360 °C, the polyimide coating then decomposed at 585 °C. The incombustible gold content was calculated using the following equation:where W is the weight of monolithic capillary column with attached GNP after burning the organic polymer and polyimide coating, W is the weight of the empty capillary after burning the coating, W is the initial weight of the monolithic capillary column with attached GNP, and W is the initial weight of the empty capillary. The amount of adsorbed thiol was determined from results of frontal analysis using Eq. (2):where i is the elution time at the inflection point of the breakthrough curve, v is the void time determined by injection of non-retained compound, f is the flow rate, c is the concentration of the thiol, and L is the column length. A simple calculation then provided the number of thiol molecules per square nanometer of the external surface of nanoparticle.

Preparation of monolithic capillary columns

The preparation of generic poly(glycidyl methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethacrylate) monoliths and their modification with cystamine, tris(2-carboxylethyl)phosphine, and 15 nm gold nanoparticles shown in Fig. 1 was carried out using the procedure developed by Lv et al. [12]. The inner surface of the capillary was first vinylized using 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate to enable covalent attachment of the monolith. The polymerization mixture that consisted of 30 wt% 1-dodecanol and 30 wt% cyclohexane (both porogens), 24 wt% glycidyl methacrylate and 16 wt% ethylene dimethacrylate (both monomers) and AIBN as initiator (1 wt% with respect to monomers) was homogenized by sonication for 15 min and degassed by purging with nitrogen for 5 min. The polymerization mixture was then introduced into the vinylized capillary. The capillary was sealed at both ends with a rubber septum and immersed for 24 h in a water bath thermostated at 60 °C. After the polymerization reaction was completed, a piece of capillary containing the monolith was cut at both ends of the capillary to liberate the virgin monolithic structure, and the monolith was flushed with acetonitrile to remove unreacted components.
Fig. 1

Preparation of poly(glycidyl methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethacrylate) monolith and its modifications with cystamine, reduction with tris(2-carboxylethyl)phosphine, attachment of gold nanoparticles, and coating with 1-octanethiol.

Subsequently the generic monoliths were modified with cystamine and TCEP to generate the desired thiol functionalities required for attachment of the gold nanoparticles [12]. A high pressure 260D ISCO syringe pump was used for the modification of the monoliths with GNP. Colloidal dispersion of GNP was filled in the loop and the dispersion contained in the loop was pumped through the functionalized monolithic column at a flow rate of 5 μL/min until the entire column length turned deep red and a pink solution was observed coming out of the capillary outlet. The last step in the preparation of the functionalized monoliths included pumping 500 μL of C8 and C12 alkanethiol solution (3.0 mol/L in ethanol) at a flow rate of 0.5 μL/min through the monoliths. This process resulted in the reversed phase columns with respective to C8 and C12 functionalities. “Tipped” columns with ion exchange functionalities were obtained via pumping respective solutions of mercaptoalkanoic acids (8MOA, 11MUA, 0.5 mol/L in ethanol) and the aminothiol (DAM 0.5 mol/L in TRIS buffer pH 8). Columns containing combined alkyl and alkylcarboxylic acid ligands were prepared by pumping mixed solution of alkanethiols and mercaptoalkanoic acids (molar ratios 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1) through the GNP functionalized monoliths. All the columns were then washed with ethanol and acetonitrile.

Results and discussion

Preparation of monolithic columns with GNP

Epoxide functionalities of the generic poly(glycidyl methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethacrylate) monolith reacted first with cystamine, and the monolith was subsequently treated with TCEP to cleave the disulfide bridges of cystamine and liberate the desired free thiol groups. GNP dispersion was then pumped through the monolithic column and the 15 nm nanoparticles were attached to the pore surface. The monolith changed its color from white to pinkish-red during this process. The SEM image in Fig. 2 confirms the excellent pore surface coverage with GNP. Elemental analysis using EDX indicated the presence of 44.8 wt% gold. TGA analysis confirmed this value. This gold content is on par with 45.0 wt% that we found previously [12].
Fig. 2

Scanning electron micrograph of the internal structures of functionalized poly(glycidyl methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethacrylate) monoliths with attached 15 nm gold nanoparticles.

The open surface of GNP was then functionalized using alkanethiols, mercaptoalkanoic acids, and amine containing thiols to obtain monolithic capillary columns suitable for separations using reverse phase, cation exchange, and anion exchange mechanisms. First, frontal elution was used to characterize the saturation rate and quantity of the thiol molecules attached to the GNP surface. Fig. 3 shows an example of the breakthrough curve for the column through which an ethanol solution of 11MUA was pushed at a flow rate of 2 μL/min using the precise nano HPLC pump. The breakthrough curve is very steep and confirms that both the mass transport and the interaction rates of the thiols with the GNP surface were very fast.
Fig. 3

Breakthrough curve of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid in gold nanoparticles containing monolithic column. Conditions: column 12 cm × 100 μm; Flow rate: 0.5 μL/min; Concentration of ethanolic solution of the acid 21.8 μg/μL; UV detection at 210 nm.

Scanning electron micrographs confirmed that the GNP has a spherical shape. A simple calculation for GNP with a diameter of 15 nm results in a surface area of 706.86 nm2 and a volume of 1767.15 nm3. Both EDX and TGA determined 44.8 wt% gold in the monolith. Using density of gold 19.3 g/cm3, we calculated that 1 cm of the monolith contains about 7.7 × 1011 gold nanoparticles. Knowing the number of GNP attached in the column, the concentration of the thiol molecules in the solution, and the volume at the 10% breakthrough, we were able to calculate the number of thiol molecules per unit of the external surface area of GNP. Table 1 presents these values for all individual compounds used in this study. The average numbers 4.51 and 4.46 molecules per nm2 of GNP surface were close for both C8 and C12 linear alkanethiols. These numbers were somewhat lower than those found in the literature for similar compounds [17] since the alkanethiols cannot bind to the gold surface that is already used for the attachment to the pore surface of the solid support. They also showed that an increase in the length of the alkyl had only a negligible effect on the number of attached molecules. The same observation, i.e. small effect of the alkyl length, also applied for C7 and C10 mercaptoalkanoic acids. In contrast to alkanethiols, the numbers of 8-mercaptooctanoic and 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid molecules attached to the GNP were 2.45 and 2.39 per nm2 of GNP surface, respectively, and represent only slightly more than one half of the coverage observed with alkanethiols. We speculate that the repulsive effects of the ionized carboxylic acid functionalities prevent denser coverage of the gold surface with these molecules. Interestingly, this inference appears not to apply to coverage with diethylaminoethanethiol that was 4.69 molecules per nm2. This value was the highest of all the molecules we tested. This may be result of both the non-ionic character of the hydrochloride form and the smaller molecular weight of the amine molecule.
Table 1

Calculated numbers of the thiol-containing molecules per unit of surface area of gold nanoparticles attached to the pore surface within monolith.

Thiol-containing compoundMolecules per nm2
1-Octanethiol4.51
1-Dodecanethiol4.46
8-Mercaptooctanoic acid2.45
11-Mercaptoundecanoic acid2.39
2-Diethylaminoethanethiol.HCl4.69
In order to modify several columns at the same time, and to increase the production throughput, in follow-up experiments we used a syringe pump operating several syringes simultaneously to push the thiol solutions through the monoliths. The flow rate was attenuated to 0.5 μL/min to prevent pressure buildup in the system. We did not find any difference in performance of columns functionalized using either approach.

Separation of proteins

The aim of this study was to develop a technique enabling design of separation media in which the chemistry can be easily adjusted for each specific target protein mixture. Several control experiments were carried out to demonstrate the effect of the functionalized gold nanoparticles on the separation performance. As presented in Table 2, the generic column retained and then separated all three proteins RNase A, Cyt-C, and Mb present in the test mixture. This ability to separate can be ascribed to the intrinsic hydrophobicity of the poly(glycidyl methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethacrylate) monolith. During modification with cystamine, TCEP, and GNP, the hydrophobic character of the monolith completely disappeared and the proteins were eluted at the void volume.
Table 2

Reverse phase retention factors of selected proteins using monolithic capillary columns varying in modifications in. Conditions: column: 12 cm × 100 μm i.d.; linear mobile phase gradient 5–70% acetonitrile in 0.1 vol% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid in 7.5 min; Flow rate 2.0 μL/min; UV detection 210 nm.

Functionalization withRetention factor, k
Mixture 1
Mixture 2
RNase AaCyt-CMbLYZBSAHb
Control experiments
None (generic)6.67.78.6N/AbN/AN/A
Cystamine0.90.90.9N/AN/AN/A
TCEP1.01.01.0N/AN/AN/A
Gold nanoparticles1.01.01.0N/AN/AN/A



Columns with attached and functionalized gold nanoparticles
C-86.97.38.87.88.38.6
11MUA:C8 1:35.76.27.16.77.07.2
11MUA:C8 1:15.66.17.16.67.37.5
11MUA:C8 3:15.36.06.906.86.9
11-MUA4.55.36.106.06.4



C-126.87.48.47.78.28.6
11MUA:C12 1:36.57.18.46.97.57.7
11MUA:C12 1:16.67.28.37.78.28.4
11MUA:C12 3:16.16.67.77.07.77.7
11-MUA4.55.36.106.06.4



C-86.97.38.87.88.38.6
8MOA:C8 1:36.26.77.87.27.88.3
8MOA:C8 1:16.36.87.77.07.88.1
8MOA:C8 3:15.86.27.36.87.37.5
8-MOA005.001.15.0
DAM4.85.36.3N/AN/AN/A

For explanation of abbreviations see Experimental.

N/A = measurements were not carried out.

Surface chemistry of the columns containing gold nanoparticles was modulated by reaction with individual thiols and their mixtures. The retention factors calculated for differently functionalized columns from separations of six proteins under the reverse phase conditions are summarized in Table 2. These six proteins were divided into two groups of three (RNase A, Cyt-C, Mb, and LYZ, BSA, Hb), and each group was injected separately. The results confirmed that columns modified with C8 and C12 alkanethiols exhibited the highest hydrophobicity and longest retention for all of the proteins. Admixing carboxylic acid derivatives in the surface coverage led to a decrease in retention with an increasing proportion of this compound in the modification mixture. Due to reduced coverage with the mercaptoalkanoic acids described earlier in this text, the effect of these molecules appeared only after they prevailed in the modification mixture, i.e. at the ratios 3:1. The retention reached the lowest level for the singular “tipped” type mixed mode columns obtained after modifications with individual mercaptoundecanoic and mercaptooctanoic acids, respectively. The presence of hydrophilic carboxylic acid groups decreased hydrophobicity of the ligands. However, the elution order of the proteins did not change in any of these columns. Fig. 4 demonstrates the effect of the presence of carboxylic acid groups, or mixed mode mechanism, with separation of a mixture of RNase A, Cyt-C and Mb. Chromatogram in Fig. 4A represents separation using the mobile phase typical of reverse phase achieved with a column modified with 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid alone. The separation was poor, the peaks were broad, and the retention times short. Both the enhanced surface hydrophilicity and limited surface coverage with the ligand may be responsible for that. The situation improved for columns modified with a 1:1 mixture of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid and 1-octanethiol (Fig. 4B). The best separation shown in Fig. 4C and the longest retention times were achieved with the columns modified with pure 1-octanethiol. The last panel D of Fig. 4 presents separations using columns functionalized with 2-diethylaminoethanethiol. This separation was significantly better than that shown in Fig. 4A although both columns were modified with ionizable molecules. The better column performance after functionalization with the amine was probably the result of the much higher surface coverage as discussed above.
Fig. 4

Reverse phase separation of a mixture of three proteins using differently functionalized gold nanoparticles containing monolithic columns. (A) Column functionalized with 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid; (B): column functionalized with a 1:1 mixture of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid and 1-octanethiol; (C) column functionalized with 1-octanethiol; (D) column functionalized with 2-diethylaminoethanethiol; column: 12 cm × 100 μm; mobile phase: gradient of 5–70% acetonitrile in 0.1% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid in 7.5 min; Flow rate: 2 μL/min: UV detection at 210 nm. Peaks: 1 – ribonuclease A, 2 – cytochrome C, 3 – myoglobin.

We also tested the separation performance of the columns under conditions typical for ion exchange mode, i.e. using an increasing gradient of salt concentration in aqueous mobile phase. Since the stationary phases were operating in the mixed mode, the hydrophobic interactions could not be neglected and the mobile phase also had to contain strong organic solvent. All three proteins RNase A (pI 9.6), Cyt-C (pI 10.0–10.5), and LYZ (pI 9.3) held a positive net charge in buffer solutions with a pH value less than 9. Therefore, we optimized the mobile phase. Best results were achieved with a mobile phase comprised of a sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7) and 10 vol% acetonitrile, and the elution was obtained in a gradient of sodium chloride. For example, Fig. 5 shows a good separation of three proteins that was carried out at a high flow rate of 4 μL/min, and completed in less than 4 min. It is worth noting that this high speed separation was possible due to the advantageous porous structure of the monolith. Table 3 summarizes the results obtained using ion exchange separation conditions for several columns differing in surface chemistry. Due to the obvious hydrophobic character of most of these mixed mode phases, no elution was observed for any of the proteins until the gold surface was highly saturated with the mercaptoalkanoic acid. However, even then, the retention was substantial with retention factors significantly exceeding those monitored for separations under reverse phase conditions which are presented in Table 2. This observation once again confirms the mixed mode character of the monolithic columns.
Fig. 5

Weak anion exchange separation of a mixture of three proteins using gold nanoparticles containing monolithic columns functionalized with 8-mercaptooctanoic acid. Conditions: column: 12 cm × 100 μm; mobile phase A: 10 vol% acetonitrile in 1 mmol/L sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7); B: 0.5 mol NaCl solution in A; Gradient: 0% B to 90% B in 1 min; Flow rate: 4 μL/min; UV detection at 210 nm. Peaks: 1 – ribonuclease A, 2 – cytochrome C, 3 – lysozyme.

Table 3

Effect of surface functionalities on the retention factor of three proteins under conditions typical of ion exchange chromatography. Conditions: column: 12 cm × 100 μm; mobile phase A: 10 vol% acetonitrile in 1 mmol/L NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 buffer (pH 7); B: 0.5 mol/L NaCl solution in A; gradient: 0% B to 90% B in 1 min; flow rate: 4 μL/min; UV detection at 210 nm.

FunctionalityMolar ratioRNase AaCyt-CLYZ
C8N/EbN/EN/E
C12N/EN/EN/E
C8:8MOA1:1N/EN/EN/E
C8:8MOA1:38.3N/E11.8
C8:11MUA1:1N/EN/EN/E
C8:11MUA1:38.7N/E14.7
C12:11MUA1:3N/EN/EN/E
11MUA8.7N/E13.3
8MOA8.713.014.7

For explanation of protein abbreviations see Experimental.

N/E = no elution was observed under these conditions.

Conclusions

This preliminary report shows that monolithic capillary columns can be designed and prepared in a way that they contain well-defined combination of different chemistries suitable for chromatographic separations of proteins in the mixed mode. This study also demonstrated that monolithic capillary columns, containing gold nanoparticles as an intermediate ligand, enabled simultaneous attachment of two different types of thiol group containing molecules, including plain hydrophobic, and alkylcarboxylic acid moieties. Our results confirmed that the selectivity of these columns can be modulated by adjusting the composition of the alkanethiol/mercaptoalkanoic acid mixture. Good separations of protein mixtures could be then achieved using conditions typical of the gradient elution in the reverse phase and ion exchange modes, respectively. While these results are promising and open new avenues to the formation of stationary phases including multiplicity of chemistries designed for specific separation, much remains to be done. We are currently focusing our attention on the preparation of mixed mode phases that will be also useful for the separation of small molecules.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Mixed-mode chromatography and its applications to biopolymers.

Authors:  Yun Yang; Xindu Geng
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 2.  Ligands for mixed-mode protein chromatography: Principles, characteristics and design.

Authors:  Guofeng Zhao; Xiao-Yan Dong; Yan Sun
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 3.  Application of gold nanoparticles in separation sciences.

Authors:  David Sýkora; Václav Kasicka; Ivan Miksík; Pavel Rezanka; Kamil Záruba; Pavel Matejka; Vladimír Král
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.645

4.  Pipette-tip selective extraction of glycoproteins with lectin modified gold nano-particles on a polymer monolithic phase.

Authors:  Hassan Alwael; Damian Connolly; Paul Clarke; Roisin Thompson; Brendan Twamley; Brendan O'Connor; Brett Paull
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 4.616

5.  Polymer monoliths with exchangeable chemistries: use of gold nanoparticles as intermediate ligands for capillary columns with varying surface functionalities.

Authors:  Qing Cao; Yan Xu; Feng Liu; Frantisek Svec; Jean M J Fréchet
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Preparation of porous polymer monoliths featuring enhanced surface coverage with gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yongqin Lv; Fernando Maya Alejandro; Jean M J Fréchet; Frantisek Svec
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Porous polymer monolithic column with surface-bound gold nanoparticles for the capture and separation of cysteine-containing peptides.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Qing Cao; Frantisek Svec; Jean M J Fréchet
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Preparation of reusable bioreactors using reversible immobilization of enzyme on monolithic porous polymer support with attached gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yongqin Lv; Zhixing Lin; Tianwei Tan; Frantisek Svec
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Silver-coated monolithic columns for separation in radiopharmaceutical applications.

Authors:  Ondrej Sedlacek; Jan Kucka; Frantisek Svec; Martin Hruby
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.645

10.  Quantifying thiol ligand density of self-assembled monolayers on gold nanoparticles by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Helmut Hinterwirth; Stefanie Kappel; Thomas Waitz; Thomas Prohaska; Wolfgang Lindner; Michael Lämmerhofer
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 15.881

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gold nanoparticles-functionalized monolithic column for enantioseparation of eight basic chiral drugs by capillary electrochromatography.

Authors:  Mingxuan Ma; Yingxiang Du; Jiangxia Yang; Zijie Feng; Wen Ding; Cheng Chen
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  An organic polymer monolith modified with an amino acid ionic liquid and graphene oxide for use in capillary electrochromatography: application to the separation of amino acids, β-blockers, and nucleotides.

Authors:  Shiyuan Zhao; Tao Yu; Yingxiang Du; Xiaodong Sun; Zijie Feng; Xiaofei Ma; Wen Ding; Cheng Chen
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.833

3.  Selective capture of glycoproteins using lectin-modified nanoporous gold monolith.

Authors:  Allan J Alla; Felipe B D' Andrea; Jay K Bhattarai; Jared A Cooper; Yih Horng Tan; Alexei V Demchenko; Keith J Stine
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 4.  Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Au and Ag Nanoparticles. Breakthroughs and Perspectives.

Authors:  Ilaria Fratoddi
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 5.  Methacrylate Polymer Monoliths for Separation Applications.

Authors:  Robert J Groarke; Dermot Brabazon
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.