Literature DB >> 26257267

Adjusting Hip Fracture Probability in Men and Women Using Hip Axis Length: the Manitoba Bone Density Database.

William D Leslie1, Lisa M Lix2, Suzanne N Morin3, Helena Johansson4, Anders Odén4, Eugene V McCloskey4, John A Kanis4.   

Abstract

Most studies report that longer hip axis length (HAL) is associated with increased hip fracture risk in women, but comparable data in men are sparse. Using a registry of all dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results for Manitoba, Canada, we identified 4738 men and 50,420 women aged 40 yr and older with baseline hip DXA results, HAL measurements, and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) hip fracture probability computed with femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). Population-based health service records were assessed for a subsequent hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture. During mean 6.2 yr of follow-up, 70 men and 1020 women developed incident hip fractures. Mean HAL was significantly greater in those with vs without incident hip fractures (men 123.0 ± 7.6 vs 121.3 ± 7.4 mm, p = 0.050; women 106.9 ± 6.2 vs 104.6 ± 6.2 mm, p < 0.001). When adjusted for age and femoral neck BMD, each millimeter increase in HAL increased hip fracture risk by 3.6% in men (p = 0.022) and 4.6% in women (p < 0.001); this association was unaffected by sex (p value for interaction = 0.477). When adjusted for log-transformed FRAX hip fracture probability, each millimeter increase in HAL increased hip fracture risk by 3.4% in men (p = 0.031) and 4.8% in women (p < 0.001); this association was again unaffected by sex (p interaction = 0.409). A bilinear adjustment applicable to both men and women was developed: relative increase in hip fracture probability 4.7% for every millimeter that HAL is above the sex-specific average, relative decrease in hip fracture probability 3.8% for every millimeter that HAL is below the sex-specific average. We concluded that greater DXA-derived HAL is associated with increased incident hip fracture risk in both men and women, and this risk is independent of BMD and FRAX probability.
Copyright © 2016 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRAX; hip axis length; hip fracture; hip geometry; men; osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26257267     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  14 in total

1.  Meta-Analysis of Genomewide Association Studies Reveals Genetic Variants for Hip Bone Geometry.

Authors:  Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Karol Estrada; Evangelos Evangelou; Cheryl Ackert-Bicknell; Kristina Akesson; Thomas Beck; Suzanne J Brown; Terence Capellini; Laura Carbone; Jane Cauley; Ching-Lung Cheung; Steven R Cummings; Stefan Czerwinski; Serkalem Demissie; Michael Econs; Daniel Evans; Charles Farber; Kaare Gautvik; Tamara Harris; Candace Kammerer; John Kemp; Daniel L Koller; Annie Kung; Debbie Lawlor; Miryoung Lee; Mattias Lorentzon; Fiona McGuigan; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Braxton Mitchell; Anne Newman; Carrie Nielson; Claes Ohlsson; Munro Peacock; Sjur Reppe; J Brent Richards; John Robbins; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Timothy D Spector; Kari Stefansson; Elizabeth Streeten; Unnur Styrkarsdottir; Jonathan Tobias; Katerina Trajanoska; André Uitterlinden; Liesbeth Vandenput; Scott G Wilson; Laura Yerges-Armstrong; Mariel Young; M Carola Zillikens; Fernando Rivadeneira; Douglas P Kiel; David Karasik
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Osteoporosis Imaging in the Geriatric Patient.

Authors:  Ursula Heilmeier; Jiwon Youm; Soheyla Torabi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2016-02-15

3.  Spine-Hip Thickness Ratio and Diabetes.

Authors:  Robert D Blank
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Celia L Gregson; David J Armstrong; Jean Bowden; Cyrus Cooper; John Edwards; Neil J L Gittoes; Nicholas Harvey; John Kanis; Sarah Leyland; Rebecca Low; Eugene McCloskey; Katie Moss; Jane Parker; Zoe Paskins; Kenneth Poole; David M Reid; Mike Stone; Julia Thomson; Nic Vine; Juliet Compston
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.879

Review 6.  Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Gabriele Maffi; Jacopo Antonino Vitale; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 7.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 8.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 9.  A brief history of FRAX.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Helena Johansson; Nicholas C Harvey; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Proximal Femoral Geometry as Fracture Risk Factor in Female Patients with Osteoporotic Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Jun Han; Myung Hoon Hahn
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2016-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.