Mary Carolan-Olah1, Maria Duarte-Gardea2, Julia Lechuga3. 1. College of Health and Biomedicine, Nursing and Midwifery, St Alban's Campus, Victoria University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, College of Health Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.
Abstract
AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To present the evidence in relation to early life nutrition and foetal programming for adult disease. BACKGROUND: Epigenetics is a new and growing area of study investigating the impact of the intrauterine environment on the lifelong health of individuals. DESIGN: Discursive paper. METHOD: Searches were conducted in a range of electronic health databases. Hand searches located additional articles for review. Maternal search terms included: pregnancy; nutrition; diet; obesity; over nutrition; under nutrition. Offspring related search terms included: macrosomia; intrauterine growth restriction; epigenetics; foetal programming; childhood obesity; adolescent obesity; adolescent type 2 diabetes. DISCUSSION: Results indicate that foetal programming for adult disease occurs in response to particular insults during vulnerable developmental periods. Four main areas of foetal exposure were identified in this review: (1) under nutrition; (2) over nutrition; (3) gestational diabetes mellitus; and (4) infant catch-up growth. Numerous studies also described the trans-generational nature of foetal programming. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, foetal exposure to excess or insufficient nutrition during vulnerable developmental periods appears to result in a lifelong predisposition to obesity and adult disease, such as type 2 diabetes and cardiac disease. For the infant who has been undernourished during early life, a predisposition to renal disease also occurs. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Pregnancy is a time when women are engaged in health systems and are receptive to health messages. These factors suggest that pregnancy may be an optimal time for dietary education and intervention. There is a particular need for education on healthy diet and for interventions which aim to limit over consumption of calories.
AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To present the evidence in relation to early life nutrition and foetal programming for adult disease. BACKGROUND: Epigenetics is a new and growing area of study investigating the impact of the intrauterine environment on the lifelong health of individuals. DESIGN: Discursive paper. METHOD: Searches were conducted in a range of electronic health databases. Hand searches located additional articles for review. Maternal search terms included: pregnancy; nutrition; diet; obesity; over nutrition; under nutrition. Offspring related search terms included: macrosomia; intrauterine growth restriction; epigenetics; foetal programming; childhood obesity; adolescent obesity; adolescent type 2 diabetes. DISCUSSION: Results indicate that foetal programming for adult disease occurs in response to particular insults during vulnerable developmental periods. Four main areas of foetal exposure were identified in this review: (1) under nutrition; (2) over nutrition; (3) gestational diabetes mellitus; and (4) infant catch-up growth. Numerous studies also described the trans-generational nature of foetal programming. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, foetal exposure to excess or insufficient nutrition during vulnerable developmental periods appears to result in a lifelong predisposition to obesity and adult disease, such as type 2 diabetes and cardiac disease. For the infant who has been undernourished during early life, a predisposition to renal disease also occurs. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Pregnancy is a time when women are engaged in health systems and are receptive to health messages. These factors suggest that pregnancy may be an optimal time for dietary education and intervention. There is a particular need for education on healthy diet and for interventions which aim to limit over consumption of calories.
Authors: Poh Hui Wee; See Ling Loy; Jia Ying Toh; Elaine Kwang Hsia Tham; Yin Bun Cheung; Keith M Godfrey; Peter D Gluckman; Seang Mei Saw; Yap-Seng Chong; Ngee Lek; Jerry Kok Yen Chan; Daniel Yam Thiam Goh; Mary Foong-Fong Chong; Fabian Yap Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Juliana de Almeida Faria; Daniella Duque-Guimarães; Asha A M Carpenter; Elena Loche; Susan E Ozanne Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: A P Starling; A L B Shapiro; K A Sauder; J L Kaar; B M Ringham; D H Glueck; H L Galan; D Dabelea Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 2.521