| Literature DB >> 26255756 |
Mélissa C Allé1, Jevita Potheegadoo2, Christin Köber3, Priscille Schneider4, Romain Coutelle5, Tilmann Habermas3, Jean-Marie Danion2, Fabrice Berna2.
Abstract
Self-narratives of patients have received increasing interest in schizophrenia since they offer unique material to study patients' subjective experience related to their illness, in particular the alteration of self that accompanies schizophrenia. In this study, we investigated the life narratives and the ability to integrate and bind memories of personal events into a coherent narrative in 27 patients with schizophrenia and 26 controls. Four aspects of life narratives were analyzed: coherence with cultural concept of biography, temporal coherence, causal-motivational coherence and thematic coherence. Results showed that in patients cultural biographical knowledge is preserved, whereas temporal coherence is partially impaired. Furthermore, causal-motivational and thematic coherence are significantly impaired: patients have difficulties explaining how events have modeled their identity, and integrating different events along thematic lines. Impairment of global causal-motivational and thematic coherence was significantly correlated with patients' executive dysfunction, suggesting that cognitive impairment observed in patients could affect their ability to construct a coherent narrative of their life by binding important events to their self. This study provides new understanding of the cognitive deficits underlying self-disorders in patients with schizophrenia. Our findings suggest the potential usefulness of developing new therapeutic interventions to improve autobiographical reasoning skills.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26255756 PMCID: PMC4530446 DOI: 10.1038/srep12934
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The four aspects of the life story and their methods of assessment (according to Köber et al., 2015).
Demographic, clinical and neuropsychological data of patients with schizophrenia and controls.
| Patients with schizophrenia(n = 27) | Controls(n = 26) | ANOVA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | F | Effect size (ŋ2) | ||
| Age (years) | 35.15 | (8.91) | 33.88 | (9.80) | 0.24 | .62 | 0.05 |
| Years of schooling | 12.70 | (2.37) | 12.92 | (2.40) | 0.11 | .74 | 0.02 |
| BDI | 2.96 | (3.38) | |||||
| CDSSb | 1.67 | (1.63) | |||||
| STAI-YA | 47.63 | (7.25) | 42.74 | (7.06) | 4.88 | .03 | 0.11 |
| STAI-YB | 49.58 | (9.08) | 39.04 | (7.62) | 16.73 | <.001 | 0.29 |
| Rosenberg Self-Esteem (RSE) | 29.67 | (4.52) | 34.50 | (3.83) | 17.56 | <.001 | 0.26 |
| Onset of the illness (years) | 22.00 | (5.59) | |||||
| Duration of illness (years) | 13.08 | (8.28) | |||||
| PANSS | 64.67 | (19.37) | |||||
| - Postive symptoms | 15.81 | (5.37) | |||||
| - Negative symptoms | 18.52 | (6.81) | |||||
| - General symptoms | 30.33 | (10.05) | |||||
| f-NART | 106.96 | (8.34) | 108.65 | (4.74) | 0.81 | .37 | 0.02 |
| WAIS-Rh (current IQ) | 95.88 | (13.59) | 99.85 | (8.56) | 1.57 | .22 | 0.03 |
| Verbal fluency (z-score) | −0.09 | (0.93) | 0.63 | (0.68) | 10.11 | .002 | 0.17 |
| Shifting score (TMT | −0.42 | (0.91) | 0.13 | (0.68) | 5.91 | .02 | 0.11 |
| Biographical practices | 31.74 | (11.27) | 31.27 | (13.11) | 0.02 | .89 | 0.00 |
| Sense of Coherence (total score) | 127.04 | (21.14) | 160.08 | (21.02) | 32.54 | <.001 | 0.39 |
| - Manageability | 43.52 | (7.57) | 55.11 | (8.23) | 28.54 | <.001 | 0.36 |
| - Meaningfullness | 38.37 | (6.43) | 47.69 | (6.47) | 27.64 | <.001 | 0.35 |
| - Comprehensibility | 45.15 | (10.32) | 57.27 | (9.61) | 19.53 | <.001 | 0.28 |
aBeck Depression Inventory.
bCalgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia.
cState-Trait Anxiety Inventory manual; part A assessing state anxiety.
dState-Trait Anxiety Inventory manual; part B assessing trait anxiety.
ePositive And Negative Syndrome Scale.
fFrench National Adult Reading Test.
gIntelligence Quotient.
hWechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised.
iTrail-Making Test.
Figure 2Causal-motivational and thematic coherence: proportion of local indicators and global ratings in patients with schizophrenia and controls.
*p < .05; **p < .01.
Figure 3Narrative framework: typicality score of the cultural life script, and proportion of local indicators and global ratings of temporal coherence in patients with schizophrenia and controls.
*p < .05.
Correlations between global ratings and local indicators of coherence in patients with schizophrenia and controls.
| Patients with schizophrenia (n = 27) | Controls (n = 26) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global temporal coherence | Global causal-motivational coherence | Global thematic coherence | Global temporal coherence | Global causal-motivational coherence | Global thematic coherence | |
| Local temporal coherence | 0.45 | 0.45 | ||||
| Local causal-motivational coherence | 0.27 | 0.52 | ||||
| Local thematic coherence | 0.32 | −0.21 | ||||
*p < .05; **p < .01.