Literature DB >> 26255598

Biofilm formation and ethanol inhibition by bacterial contaminants of biofuel fermentation.

Joseph O Rich1, Timothy D Leathers2, Kenneth M Bischoff1, Amber M Anderson1, Melinda S Nunnally1.   

Abstract

Bacterial contaminants can inhibit ethanol production in biofuel fermentations, and even result in stuck fermentations. Contaminants may persist in production facilities by forming recalcitrant biofilms. A two-year longitudinal study was conducted of bacterial contaminants from a Midwestern dry grind corn fuel ethanol facility. Among eight sites sampled in the facility, the combined liquefaction stream and yeast propagation tank were consistently contaminated, leading to contamination of early fermentation tanks. Among 768 contaminants isolated, 92% were identified as Lactobacillus sp., with the most abundant species being Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus mucosae, and Lactobacillus fermentum. Seven percent of total isolates showed the ability to form biofilms in pure cultures, and 22% showed the capacity to significantly inhibit ethanol production. However, these traits were not correlated. Ethanol inhibition appeared to be related to acetic acid production by contaminants, particularly by obligately heterofermentative species such as L. fermentum and L. mucosae. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Biofuel; Contaminants; Inhibition of ethanol production; Lactobacillus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26255598     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  8 in total

1.  Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum on the ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xianlin He; Bo Liu; Yali Xu; Ze Chen; Hao Li
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Characterization of microbial communities in ethanol biorefineries.

Authors:  Fernanda C Firmino; Davide Porcellato; Madison Cox; Garret Suen; Jeffery R Broadbent; James L Steele
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 3.  Stress-tolerant non-conventional microbes enable next-generation chemical biosynthesis.

Authors:  Sarah Thorwall; Cory Schwartz; Justin W Chartron; Ian Wheeldon
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 15.040

4.  Using drug-loaded pH-responsive poly(4-vinylpyridine) microspheres as a new strategy for intelligent controlling of Lactobacillus plantarum contamination in bioethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Ming Li; Hong-Wei Hu; Ze Chen; Ya-Xian Zhang; Hao Li
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Microbial-derived products as potential new antimicrobials.

Authors:  Bruce S Seal; Djamel Drider; Brian B Oakley; Harald Brüssow; David Bikard; Joseph O Rich; Stefan Miller; Estelle Devillard; Jason Kwan; Gérard Bertin; Stuart Reeves; Steven M Swift; Margot Raicek; Cyril G Gay
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Recombinant bacteriophage LysKB317 endolysin mitigates Lactobacillus infection of corn mash fermentations.

Authors:  Shao-Yeh Lu; Kenneth M Bischoff; Joseph O Rich; Siqing Liu; Christopher D Skory
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  A New Model of Alcoholic Fermentation under a Byproduct Inhibitory Effect.

Authors:  Hamid Zentou; Zurina Zainal Abidin; Robiah Yunus; Dayang R Awang Biak; Mohammed Abdullah Issa; Musa Yahaya Pudza
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 8.  Leveraging Pseudomonas Stress Response Mechanisms for Industrial Applications.

Authors:  Kelly Craig; Brant R Johnson; Amy Grunden
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.