Literature DB >> 26255358

Ecosystem services from a degraded peatland of Central Kalimantan: implications for policy, planning, and management.

Elizabeth A Law, Bretr A Bryan, Erik Meijaard, Thilak Mallawaarachchi, Matthew Struebig, Kerrie A Wilson.   

Abstract

Increasingly, landscapes are managed for multiple objectives to balance social, economic, and environmental goals. The Ex-Mega Rice Project (EMRP) peatland in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia provides a timely example with globally significant development, carbon, and biodiversity concerns. To inform future policy, planning, and management in the EMRP, we quantified and mapped ecosystem service values, assessed their spatial interactions, and evaluated the potential provision of ecosystem services under future land-use scenarios. We focus on key policy-relevant regulating (carbon stocks and the potential for emissions reduction), provisioning (timber, crops from smallholder agriculture, palm oil), and supporting (biodiversity) services. We found that implementation of existing land-use plans has the potential to improve total ecosystem service provision. We identify a number of significant inefficiencies, trade-offs, and unintended outcomes that may arise. For example, the potential development of existing palm oil concessions over one-third of the region may shift smallholder agriculture into low-productivity regions and substantially impact carbon and biodiversity outcomes. While improved management of conservation zones may enhance the protection of carbon stocks, not all biodiversity features will be represented, and there will be a reduction in timber harvesting and agricultural production. This study highlights how ecosystem service analyses can be structured to better inform policy, planning, and management in globally significant but data-poor regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26255358     DOI: 10.1890/13-2014.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  3 in total

1.  Who Benefits from Ecosystem Services? A Case Study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.

Authors:  Aritta Suwarno; Lars Hein; Elham Sumarga
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Land-use choices follow profitability at the expense of ecological functions in Indonesian smallholder landscapes.

Authors:  Yann Clough; Vijesh V Krishna; Marife D Corre; Kevin Darras; Lisa H Denmead; Ana Meijide; Stefan Moser; Oliver Musshoff; Stefanie Steinebach; Edzo Veldkamp; Kara Allen; Andrew D Barnes; Natalie Breidenbach; Ulrich Brose; Damayanti Buchori; Rolf Daniel; Reiner Finkeldey; Idham Harahap; Dietrich Hertel; A Mareike Holtkamp; Elvira Hörandl; Bambang Irawan; I Nengah Surati Jaya; Malte Jochum; Bernhard Klarner; Alexander Knohl; Martyna M Kotowska; Valentyna Krashevska; Holger Kreft; Syahrul Kurniawan; Christoph Leuschner; Mark Maraun; Dian Nuraini Melati; Nicole Opfermann; César Pérez-Cruzado; Walesa Edho Prabowo; Katja Rembold; Akhmad Rizali; Ratna Rubiana; Dominik Schneider; Sri Sudarmiyati Tjitrosoedirdjo; Aiyen Tjoa; Teja Tscharntke; Stefan Scheu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Global economic trade-offs between wild nature and tropical agriculture.

Authors:  Luis R Carrasco; Edward L Webb; William S Symes; Lian P Koh; Navjot S Sodhi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 8.029

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.