Gotaro Kojima1. 1. Japan Green Medical Centre, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: gotarokojima@yahoo.co.jp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although multiple longitudinal studies have investigated frailty as a predictor of future falls, the results were mixed. Thus far, no systematic review or meta-analysis on this topic has been conducted. OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence of frailty as a predictor of future falls among community-dwelling older people. METHODS: Systematic review of literature and meta-analysis were performed using 6 electronic databases (Embase, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library) searching for studies that prospectively examined risk of future fall risk according to frailty among community-dwelling older people published from 2010 to April 2015 with no language restrictions. RESULTS: Of 2245 studies identified through the systematic review, 11 studies incorporating 68,723 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. Among 7 studies reporting odds ratios (ORs), frailty and prefrailty were significantly associated with higher risk of future falls (pooled OR = 1.84, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.43-2.38, P < .001; pooled OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.01-1.53, P = .005, respectively). Among 4 studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs), whereas frailty was significantly associated with higher risk of future falls (pooled HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.10-1.41, P < .001), future fall risk according to prefrailty did not reach statistical significance (pooled HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.95-1·36, P = .15). High heterogeneity was noted among 7 studies reporting ORs and seemed attributed to difference in gender proportion of cohorts according to subgroup and meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is demonstrated to be a significant predictor of future falls among community-dwelling older people despite various criteria used to define frailty. The future fall risk according to frailty seemed to be higher in men than in women.
BACKGROUND: Although multiple longitudinal studies have investigated frailty as a predictor of future falls, the results were mixed. Thus far, no systematic review or meta-analysis on this topic has been conducted. OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence of frailty as a predictor of future falls among community-dwelling older people. METHODS: Systematic review of literature and meta-analysis were performed using 6 electronic databases (Embase, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library) searching for studies that prospectively examined risk of future fall risk according to frailty among community-dwelling older people published from 2010 to April 2015 with no language restrictions. RESULTS: Of 2245 studies identified through the systematic review, 11 studies incorporating 68,723 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. Among 7 studies reporting odds ratios (ORs), frailty and prefrailty were significantly associated with higher risk of future falls (pooled OR = 1.84, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.43-2.38, P < .001; pooled OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.01-1.53, P = .005, respectively). Among 4 studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs), whereas frailty was significantly associated with higher risk of future falls (pooled HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.10-1.41, P < .001), future fall risk according to prefrailty did not reach statistical significance (pooled HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.95-1·36, P = .15). High heterogeneity was noted among 7 studies reporting ORs and seemed attributed to difference in gender proportion of cohorts according to subgroup and meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is demonstrated to be a significant predictor of future falls among community-dwelling older people despite various criteria used to define frailty. The future fall risk according to frailty seemed to be higher in men than in women.
Authors: Kerri M Winters-Stone; Esther Moe; Julie N Graff; Nathan F Dieckmann; Sydnee Stoyles; Carolyn Borsch; Joshi J Alumkal; Christopher L Amling; Tomasz M Beer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rebecca S Crow; Matthew C Lohman; Dawna Pidgeon; Martha L Bruce; Stephen J Bartels; John A Batsis Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andrew B Smitherman; Chelsea Anderson; Jennifer L Lund; Jeannette T Bensen; Donald L Rosenstein; Hazel B Nichols Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Rupen Shah; Jeffrey D Borrebach; Jacob C Hodges; Patrick R Varley; Mary Kay Wisniewski; Myrick C Shinall; Shipra Arya; Jonas Johnson; Joel B Nelson; Ada Youk; Nader N Massarweh; Jason M Johanning; Daniel E Hall Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 5.562