Beata Dobrowolska1, Ian McGonagle2, Roslyn Kane3, Christine S Jackson4, Barbara Kegl5, Michael Bergin6, Esther Cabrera7, Dianne Cooney-Miner8, Veronika Di Cara9, Zvonko Dimoski10, Divna Kekus11, Majda Pajnkihar12, Nada Prlić13, Arun K Sigurdardottir14, John Wells15, Alvisa Palese16. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Staszica Street 4-6, 20-081 Lublin, Poland. Electronic address: bb.dobrowolska@gmail.com. 2. School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, LN67TS, UK. Electronic address: imcgonagle@lincoln.ac.uk. 3. School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, LN67TS, UK. Electronic address: rkane@lincoln.ac.uk. 4. School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, LN67TS, UK. Electronic address: cjackson@lincoln.ac.uk. 5. Institute for Nursing Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Žitna ul.15, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia. Electronic address: barbara.kegl@um.si. 6. School of Health Sciences, O'Connell Bianconi Building, Waterford Institute of Technology, Cork Road, Waterford, Ireland. Electronic address: mbergin@wit.ie. 7. School of Health Sciences TecnoCampus, University Pompeu Fabra, Avda. Ernest Lluch 32, 08332 Mataró, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: ecabrera@tecnocampus.cat. 8. Wegmans School of Nursing, St. John Fisher College, 3690 East Ave., Rochester, NY 14618, USA. Electronic address: dcooney-miner@sjfc.edu. 9. Czech Nurses Association, Londýnská 15, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic. Electronic address: veronika.dicara@gmail.com. 10. High Health School of Professional Studies in Belgrade, Momcila Jovanovica Street 4, 11130 Belgrade, Serbia. Electronic address: zvonkod@gmail.com. 11. High Health School of Professional Studies in Belgrade, Vojvode Milenka Street 48, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. Electronic address: divnakekus@yahoo.ca. 12. Institute for Nursing Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Žitna ul.15, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia. Electronic address: majda.pajnkihar@um.si. 13. Faculty of Nursing, Medical University of Osijek, Cara Hadrijana 10E, Osijek, Croatia. Electronic address: nadaprlic26@gmail.com. 14. School of Health Sciences, University of Akureyri, Nordurslod, 600 Akureyri, Iceland. Electronic address: arun@unak.is. 15. School of Health Sciences, O'Connell Bianconi Building, Waterford Institute of Technology, Cork Road, Waterford, Ireland. Electronic address: jswells@wit.ie. 16. School of Nursing, University of Udine, Viale Ungheria 20, 33100 Udine, Italy. Electronic address: alvisa.palese@uniud.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In spite of the number of studies available in the field and policy documents developed both at the national and the international levels, there is no reliable data available regarding the variation of roles occupied by clinical mentors (CMs) across countries. OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the CM's role; responsibilities; qualifications; employment requirements and experience in undergraduate nurse education as enacted in 11 European Union (EU) and non- EU countries. DESIGN: A case study design. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A panel of expert nurse educators from 11 countries within and outside of the EU (Croatia, Czech Republic, England, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, and the USA). METHODS: A questionnaire containing both quantitative and qualitative questions was developed and agreed by the panel using a Nominal Group Technique (NGT); four cycles of data collection and analysis were conducted involving key experts in nursing education in each country. RESULTS: In all countries, there are at least two types of clinical mentorship dedicated to undergraduate nursing students: the first is offered by higher education institutions, and the second is offered by health care providers. Variation was noted in terms of profile, responsibilities and professional requirements to act as a CM; however, the CM role is mainly carried out by registered nurses, and in most countries there are no special requirements in terms of education and experience. Those who act as CMs at the bedside continue to manage their usual caseload, thus the role adds to their work burden. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst it is imperative to have respect for the different national traditions in undergraduate nurse education, the globalisation of the nursing workforce and greater opportunities for student mobility during the course of their undergraduate education suggests that in areas such as clinical mentorship, jurisdictions, particularly within the EU, should work towards greater system harmonisation.
BACKGROUND: In spite of the number of studies available in the field and policy documents developed both at the national and the international levels, there is no reliable data available regarding the variation of roles occupied by clinical mentors (CMs) across countries. OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the CM's role; responsibilities; qualifications; employment requirements and experience in undergraduate nurse education as enacted in 11 European Union (EU) and non- EU countries. DESIGN: A case study design. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A panel of expert nurse educators from 11 countries within and outside of the EU (Croatia, Czech Republic, England, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, and the USA). METHODS: A questionnaire containing both quantitative and qualitative questions was developed and agreed by the panel using a Nominal Group Technique (NGT); four cycles of data collection and analysis were conducted involving key experts in nursing education in each country. RESULTS: In all countries, there are at least two types of clinical mentorship dedicated to undergraduate nursing students: the first is offered by higher education institutions, and the second is offered by health care providers. Variation was noted in terms of profile, responsibilities and professional requirements to act as a CM; however, the CM role is mainly carried out by registered nurses, and in most countries there are no special requirements in terms of education and experience. Those who act as CMs at the bedside continue to manage their usual caseload, thus the role adds to their work burden. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst it is imperative to have respect for the different national traditions in undergraduate nurse education, the globalisation of the nursing workforce and greater opportunities for student mobility during the course of their undergraduate education suggests that in areas such as clinical mentorship, jurisdictions, particularly within the EU, should work towards greater system harmonisation.
Authors: Kristina Mikkonen; Marco Tomietto; Anna-Maria Tuomikoski; Boris Miha Kaučič; Olga Riklikiene; Flores Vizcaya-Moreno; Rosa M Pérez-Cañaveras; Bojana Filej; Giedre Baltinaite; Giancarlo Cicolini; Maria Kääriäinen Journal: Nurs Open Date: 2021-11-02