Literature DB >> 26254509

Are the Current Outcome Measurement Tools Appropriate for the Evaluation of the Knee Status in Deep Flexion Range?

Chul-Won Ha1, Yong-Beom Park1, Young-Suk Song1, Won-Young Lee1, Yong-Geun Park2.   

Abstract

We determined whether current outcome measurement tools are appropriate for the evaluation of the knee status in deep flexion range after TKA. Patients (n = 604) with more than 120° of knee flexion were evaluated by Knee Society score, WOMAC, and high flexion knee score (HFKS). The appropriateness of measurement tools was analyzed by correlation analyses and group comparisons (group 1: 120°-129°, group 2: 130°-139°, group 3: 140°-150°). HFKS showed stronger correlation with knee flexion compared with other scores. While other scores only differentiated between groups 2 and 3, HFKS could differentiate among groups 1, 2 and 3. These findings suggest that employment of proper outcome measurement tool is needed to evaluate and differentiate the knee status in deep flexion range after TKA.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appropriateness; deep flexion range; measurement tool; outcome; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26254509     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  1 in total

1.  Kneeling and standing up from a chair as performance-based tests to evaluate knee function in the high-flexion range: a randomized controlled trial comparing a conventional and a high-flexion TKA design.

Authors:  Paul J P van der Ven; Sebastiaan van de Groes; Jorrit Zelle; Sander Koëter; Gerjon Hannink; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.