John M Fallon1, Philip P Goodney2, David H Stone2, Virendra I Patel3, Brian W Nolan2, Jeffrey A Kalish4, Yuanyuan Zhao2, Allen D Hamdan5. 1. Division of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH. Electronic address: john.m.fallon@hitchcock.org. 2. Division of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH. 3. Division of Vascular Surgery, The Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass. 4. Division of Vascular Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass. 5. Division of Vascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Optimal patient selection for lower extremity revascularization remains a clinical challenge among the hemodialysis-dependent (HD). The purpose of this study was to examine contemporary real world open and endovascular outcomes of HD patients to better facilitate patient selection for intervention. METHODS: A regional multicenter registry was queried between 2003 and 2013 for HD patients (N = 689) undergoing open surgical bypass (n = 295) or endovascular intervention (n = 394) for lower extremity revascularization. Patient demographics and comorbidities were recorded. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included graft patency, freedom from major adverse limb events, and amputation-free survival (AFS). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for death and amputation. RESULTS: Among the 689 HD patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization, 66% were male, and 83% were white. Ninety percent of revascularizations were performed for critical limb ischemia and 8% for claudication. Overall survival at 1, 2, and 5 years survival remained low at 60%, 43%, and 21%, respectively. Overall 1- and 2-year AFS was 40% and 17%. Mortality accounted for the primary mode of failure for both open bypass (78%) and endovascular interventions (80%) at two years. Survival, AFS, and freedom from major adverse limb event outcomes did not differ significantly between revascularization techniques. At 2 years, endovascular patency was higher than open bypass (76% vs 26%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.71; P = .02). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥80 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5; P < .01), indication of rest pain or tissue loss (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6; P < .01), preoperative wheelchair/bedridden status (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P < .01), coronary artery disease (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9; P < .01), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = .01) as independent predictors of death. The presence of three or more risk factors resulted in predicted 1-year mortality of 64%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival and AFS among HD patients remains poor, irrespective of revascularization strategy. Mortality remains the primary driver for these findings and justifies a prudent approach to patient selection. Focus for improved results should emphasize predictors of survival to better identify those most likely to benefit from revascularization.
OBJECTIVE: Optimal patient selection for lower extremity revascularization remains a clinical challenge among the hemodialysis-dependent (HD). The purpose of this study was to examine contemporary real world open and endovascular outcomes of HDpatients to better facilitate patient selection for intervention. METHODS: A regional multicenter registry was queried between 2003 and 2013 for HDpatients (N = 689) undergoing open surgical bypass (n = 295) or endovascular intervention (n = 394) for lower extremity revascularization. Patient demographics and comorbidities were recorded. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included graft patency, freedom from major adverse limb events, and amputation-free survival (AFS). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for death and amputation. RESULTS: Among the 689 HDpatients undergoing lower extremity revascularization, 66% were male, and 83% were white. Ninety percent of revascularizations were performed for critical limb ischemia and 8% for claudication. Overall survival at 1, 2, and 5 years survival remained low at 60%, 43%, and 21%, respectively. Overall 1- and 2-year AFS was 40% and 17%. Mortality accounted for the primary mode of failure for both open bypass (78%) and endovascular interventions (80%) at two years. Survival, AFS, and freedom from major adverse limb event outcomes did not differ significantly between revascularization techniques. At 2 years, endovascular patency was higher than open bypass (76% vs 26%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.71; P = .02). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥80 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5; P < .01), indication of rest pain or tissue loss (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6; P < .01), preoperative wheelchair/bedridden status (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P < .01), coronary artery disease (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9; P < .01), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = .01) as independent predictors of death. The presence of three or more risk factors resulted in predicted 1-year mortality of 64%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival and AFS among HDpatients remains poor, irrespective of revascularization strategy. Mortality remains the primary driver for these findings and justifies a prudent approach to patient selection. Focus for improved results should emphasize predictors of survival to better identify those most likely to benefit from revascularization.
Authors: Nathan Fernandez; Ryan McEnaney; Luke K Marone; Robert Y Rhee; Steven Leers; Michel Makaroun; Rabih A Chaer Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Pranay Ramdev; Sunil S Rayan; Malachi Sheahan; Allen D Hamdan; Frank W Logerfo; Cameron M Akbari; David R Campbell; Frank B Pomposelli Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Philip P Goodney; Brian W Nolan; Andres Schanzer; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Daniel J Bertges; Andrew C Stanley; David H Stone; Daniel B Walsh; Richard J Powell; Donald S Likosky; Jack L Cronenwett Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2009-09-11 Impact factor: 1.466
Authors: Catherine R Butler; Margaret L Schwarze; Ronit Katz; Susan M Hailpern; William Kreuter; Yoshio N Hall; Maria E Montez Rath; Ann M O'Hare Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 10.121