Literature DB >> 26254400

Pentafecta Outcomes of 230 Cases of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Bilateral Neurovascular Bundle Preservation.

Yen-Chuan Ou1, Chun-Kuang Yang2, Hsun-Ming Kang3, Kuangh-Si Chang4, John Wang5, Siu-Wan Hung6, Min-Che Tung7, Ashutosh K Tewari8, Vipul R Patel9.   

Abstract

AIM: We analyzed pentafecta outcomes [complication-free, continence, potency, negative surgical margins (NSM)], biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free] of 230 patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with bilateral neurovascular (NVB) preservation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient outcomes (group I, cases 1-115; group II, cases 116-230) were assessed prospectively. Definitions were: continence, using no pads; potency, ability to achieve/maintain erections firm enough for sexual intercourse; positive surgical margin, presence of tumor tissue on inked specimen surface; and BCR, two consecutive PSA levels >0.2 ng/ml after RALP.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 62.5 years, mean PSA=8.62 ng/ml. The complication-free rate was 93.9% (216/230), continence rate 98.3% (226/230), potency 86.1% (198/230), NSM 77.0% (177/230) and BCR-free 92.6% (213/230). The trifecta rate (continence, potency, BCR-free) was 81.7% (188/230). The pentafecta rate was 60.4% (139/230).
CONCLUSION: Pentafecta is the new standard of outcomes for RARP with bilateral NVB, with patient selection and reduced positive surgical margins attaining best outcomes. Copyright
© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical recurrence; laparoscopy; pentafecta; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; robotics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26254400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  6 in total

1.  Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: racial considerations for 250 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Rashid K Sayyid; Dalton Sherwood; William G Simpson; Martha K Terris; Zachary Klaassen; Rabii Madi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-05-29

2.  [Gap between postulated and real outcome quality of radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  C Hampel; F Roos; J W Thüroff; A Neisius
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The First Pilot Comprehensive Evaluation of the Outcomes of Different Types of Robotic Surgeries in the Different Surgical Departments: The Penta, Tetra and Trifecta Achievements in Robotic Surgeries.

Authors:  Takehiro Sejima; Shuichi Morizane; Kazunori Fujiwara; Keigo Ashida; Hiroaki Saito; Yuji Taniguchi; Hiroshige Nakamura; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.641

4.  Robotic Incisional Hernia Repair After Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP): A 3-port Approach.

Authors:  Hsien-Che Ou; Li-Hua Huang; Kuang-Hsi Chang; Yen-Chuan Ou; Min-Che Tung; Wei-Chun Weng; Chao-Yu Hsu; Yi-Sheng Lin; Chin-Heng Lu; Tang-Yi Tsao
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Biochemical recurrence of pathological T2+ localized prostate cancer after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A 10-year surveillance.

Authors:  Che Hseuh Yang; Yi Sheng Lin; Yen Chuan Ou; Wei Chun Weng; Li Hua Huang; Chin Heng Lu; Chao Yu Hsu; Min Che Tung
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Development and internal validation of preoperative and postoperative nomograms predicting quadrifecta outcomes following robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gopal Sharma; Danny Darlington; Puneet Ahluwalia; Gagan Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.