Literature DB >> 26254385

Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Prognostic Clinical Marker in T4 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Masaichi Ohira1, Naoshi Kubo2, Go Masuda1, Yoshito Yamashita3, Katsunobu Sakurai1, Takahiro Toyokawa1, Hiroaki Tanaka1, Kazuya Muguruma1, Kosei Hirakawa1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Patients with clinical T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have an unfavorable prognosis, mainly indicated by the response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT), crucial to estimating long-term survival. Other prognostic measures include systemic inflammatory or immunonutritional indices such as the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) that have not been sufficiently documented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 91 patients with T4 ESCC treated at our Hospital between 2000 and 2013. All patients initially received CRT, including 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin or nedaplatin with concurrent 2-Gy/fraction radiation (total dose, 40-60 Gy). Curative tumor resection was undertaken in suitable patients on completing CRT. Patients were classified as GPS0, GPS1, or GPS2 based on C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤ 10 mg/l and albumin ≥ 35 g/l, CRP >10 mg/l or albumin <35 g/l, or CRP >10 mg/l and albumin <35 g/l, respectively. PNI was calculated as 10-times the serum albumin (g/dl)+0.005 × total lymphocyte count (/mm(3)). The impact of the pre-treatment GPS and PNI on the prognosis of patients with T4 ESCC was investigated in univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Sixty (67%) patients responded to CRT (9 complete responses and 51 partial responses). Forty-one (45%) patients also underwent surgical resection of the residual tumor. The overall 5-year survival rate and median survival time were 27.0% and 11.8 months, respectively. In the cohort of CRT-plus-surgical resection, the 5-year survival rate was significantly higher than in the groups treated with CRT-alone (51.1% vs. 6.5%; p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, good response to CRT [hazard ratio (HR) =0.449, p<0.01], GPS1/2 (HR=2.151, p=0.015), and surgical resection (HR=0.282, p<0.01) were significant prognostic factors, whereas PNI was not.
CONCLUSION: The GPS is a useful, simple survival marker for patients with T4 ESCC undergoing multimodal therapy. Copyright
© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glasgow Prognostic Score; Prognostic Nutritional Index; T4 Esophageal cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26254385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  8 in total

1.  A retrospective analysis of 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in the recent treatment strategy for patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shuji Hiramoto; Ken Kato; Hirokazu Shoji; Natsuko Okita; Atsuo Takashima; Yoshitaka Honma; Satoru Iwasa; Tetsuya Hamaguchi; Yasuhide Yamada; Yasuhiro Shimada; Narikazu Boku
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Surgical strategies for treatment of clinical T4 esophageal cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Yamada; Kyoko Nohara; Naoki Enomoto; Hitomi Wake; Syusuke Yagi; Masayoshi Terayama; Daiki Kato; Chizu Yokoi; Yasushi Kojima; Hidetsugu Nakayama; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Glob Health Med       Date:  2021-12-31

3.  Risk factors of early recurrence within 6 months after esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Yoshifumi Baba; Hironobu Shigaki; Kazuto Harada; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Junji Kurashige; Keisuke Kosumi; Ryuma Tokunaga; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Prognostic value of inflammation-based scores in patients with osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Bangjian Liu; Yujing Huang; Yuanjue Sun; Jianjun Zhang; Yang Yao; Zan Shen; Dongxi Xiang; Aina He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Esophageal stenosis and the Glasgow Prognostic Score as independent factors of poor prognosis for patients with locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy (exploratory analysis of JCOG0303).

Authors:  Tatsuya Okuno; Masashi Wakabayashi; Ken Kato; Masayuki Shinoda; Hiroshi Katayama; Hiroyasu Igaki; Yasuhiro Tsubosa; Takashi Kojima; Hiroshi Okabe; Yusuke Kimura; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Shinichi Kosugi; Yasushi Toh; Hoichi Kato; Kenichi Nakamura; Haruhiko Fukuda; Satoshi Ishikura; Nobutoshi Ando; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Treatment and clinical outcome of clinical T4 esophageal cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tomoki Makino; Makoto Yamasaki; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Masaaki Motoori; Yutaka Kimura; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-12-13

7.  The prognostic value of pretreatment Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Pengfei Li; Jue Li; Yutian Lai; Kun Zhou; Xin Wang; Guowei Che
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  The value of preoperative Glasgow Prognostic Score and the C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio as prognostic factors for long-term survival in pathological T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiangyang Yu; Yingsheng Wen; Yongbin Lin; Xuewen Zhang; Yongqiang Chen; Weidong Wang; Gongming Wang; Lanjun Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.207

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.