Literature DB >> 26254319

Grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) locomotion: gaits and ground reaction forces.

Catherine L Shine1, Skylar Penberthy2, Charles T Robbins3, O Lynne Nelson4, Craig P McGowan5.   

Abstract

Locomotion of plantigrade generalists has been relatively little studied compared with more specialised postures even though plantigrady is ancestral among quadrupeds. Bears (Ursidae) are a representative family for plantigrade carnivorans, they have the majority of the morphological characteristics identified for plantigrade species, and they have the full range of generalist behaviours. This study compared the locomotion of adult grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis Linnaeus 1758), including stride parameters, gaits and analysis of three-dimensional ground reaction forces, with that of previously studied quadrupeds. At slow to moderate speeds, grizzly bears use walks, running walks and canters. Vertical ground reaction forces demonstrated the typical M-shaped curve for walks; however, this was significantly more pronounced in the hindlimb. The rate of force development was also significantly higher for the hindlimbs than for the forelimbs at all speeds. Mediolateral forces were significantly higher than would be expected for a large erect mammal, almost to the extent of a sprawling crocodilian. There may be morphological or energetic explanations for the use of the running walk rather than the trot. The high medial forces (produced from a lateral push by the animal) could be caused by frontal plane movement of the carpus and elbow by bears. Overall, while grizzly bears share some similarities with large cursorial species, their locomotor kinetics have unique characteristics. Additional studies are needed to determine whether these characters are a feature of all bears or plantigrade species.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mammal; Mediolateral forces; Plantigrade; Quadruped

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26254319     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.121806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

1.  Low effective mechanical advantage of giraffes' limbs during walking reveals trade-off between limb length and locomotor performance.

Authors:  Christopher Basu; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  An extension to the collisional model of the energetic cost of support qualitatively explains trotting and the trot-canter transition.

Authors:  James R Usherwood
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2019-04-29

3.  Limb work and joint work minimization reveal an energetic benefit to the elbows-back, knees-forward limb design in parasagittal quadrupeds.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Michael C Granatosky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Shape Directional Asymmetry in Hindlimb Pairs among Calves (Bos Taurus).

Authors:  Arcesio Salamanca Carreño; Pere M Parés-Casanova; Oscar Mauricio Vélez Terranova; Néstor Ismael Monroy Ochoa
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Grizzlies and gazelles: Duty factor is an effective measure for categorizing running style in English Premier League soccer players.

Authors:  Brian Hanley; Catherine B Tucker; Liam Gallagher; Parag Parelkar; Liam Thomas; Rubén Crespo; Rob J Price
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-08-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.