Jennifer M Cadigan1, Matthew P Martens2, Keith C Herman2. 1. Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, United States. Electronic address: Jennifer.Cadigan@mail.missouri.edu. 2. Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Positively (Enhancement and Social) and negatively (Coping) reinforcing drinking motives have been shown to be associated with alcohol use, alcohol-related problems, and depression among college students. Although prior studies of drinking motives have mostly consisted of variable-centered analyses, the current study used a person-centered approach where individuals were grouped into categories based on shared characteristics using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA). We investigated the utility of drinking motive profiles to determine how different profiles were associated with alcohol outcomes and depressive symptoms. METHOD: Participants were 648 undergraduate students who had violated a university alcohol policy and who endorsed consuming alcohol in the past month. Social, Coping, and Enhancement subscales from the Drinking Motives Questionnaire were used as indicators. RESULTS: After examining one-through-eight class LPA solutions, the six-class solution provided the best empirical and clinically meaningful fit to the data. Classes with high coping and high positive reinforcing drinking motives consumed more alcohol than profiles of students with high coping and low positive reinforcing motives. Classes high on both coping and positively reinforcing motives reported the most alcohol related problems. Classes with higher levels of coping motives and either high or low positive reinforcing motives reported the highest depression symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Drinking motive profiles differ in terms of alcohol outcomes and depressive symptoms. We encourage researchers to explore motives for drinking with individuals, especially assessing the relationship between coping motives and depression in the presence or absence of positively reinforcing motives.
INTRODUCTION: Positively (Enhancement and Social) and negatively (Coping) reinforcing drinking motives have been shown to be associated with alcohol use, alcohol-related problems, and depression among college students. Although prior studies of drinking motives have mostly consisted of variable-centered analyses, the current study used a person-centered approach where individuals were grouped into categories based on shared characteristics using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA). We investigated the utility of drinking motive profiles to determine how different profiles were associated with alcohol outcomes and depressive symptoms. METHOD:Participants were 648 undergraduate students who had violated a university alcohol policy and who endorsed consuming alcohol in the past month. Social, Coping, and Enhancement subscales from the Drinking Motives Questionnaire were used as indicators. RESULTS: After examining one-through-eight class LPA solutions, the six-class solution provided the best empirical and clinically meaningful fit to the data. Classes with high coping and high positive reinforcing drinking motives consumed more alcohol than profiles of students with high coping and low positive reinforcing motives. Classes high on both coping and positively reinforcing motives reported the most alcohol related problems. Classes with higher levels of coping motives and either high or low positive reinforcing motives reported the highest depression symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Drinking motive profiles differ in terms of alcohol outcomes and depressive symptoms. We encourage researchers to explore motives for drinking with individuals, especially assessing the relationship between coping motives and depression in the presence or absence of positively reinforcing motives.
Authors: Laura J Holt; Stephen Armeli; Howard Tennen; Carol S Austad; Sarah A Raskin; Carolyn R Fallahi; Rebecca Wood; Rivkah I Rosen; Meredith K Ginley; Godfrey D Pearlson Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Samuel R Davis; Mark A Prince; Kevin A Hallgren; Nick Johnson; Linda R Stanley; Randall C Swaim Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2019-05-13
Authors: Renee M Cloutier; Nathan T Kearns; Ashley A Knapp; Ateka A Contractor; Heidemarie Blumenthal Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Jennifer E Merrill; Holly K Boyle; Gabriela López; Mary Beth Miller; Nancy P Barnett; Kristina M Jackson; Kate B Carey Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.928