Jason R Randall1, Nathan C Nickel2, Ian Colman3. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Canada; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Canada. Electronic address: Jason_Randall@cpe.umanitoba.ca. 2. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Canada; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Canada. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assortative relating is a proposed explanation for the increased occurrence of suicidal behavior among those exposed to suicidal peers. This explanation proposes that high-risk individuals associate with each other, and shared risk factors explain the effect. METHODS: Data were obtained from the ADDhealth longitudinal survey waves I and II (n=4834 school attending adolescents). People who reported peer suicidal behavior in the first wave were identified and classified as the exposure group. Potentially confounding variables were identified, and propensity scores were calculated for the exposure variable using logistic regression. Inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted regression estimated the effect of exposure on the risk for a suicide attempt during the first two waves. RESULTS: Weighted analysis showed that the group exposed to a friend's suicide attempt had a higher occurrence of suicide attempts in both waves. Exposure to peer suicide attempts was associated with increased suicide attempts at baseline (RR=1.93; 95%CI= 1.23-3.04) and 1-year follow-up (RR=1.70; 95%CI= 1.12-2.60). LIMITATION: Only two consecutive years of data are provided. Misclassification and recall bias are possible due to the use of self-report. The outcome may be misclassified due to respondent misunderstanding of what constitutes a suicide attempts, versus non-suicidal self-injury. Non-response and trimming reduced the sample size significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Assortative relating did not account for all the variance and is currently not sufficient to explain the increased risk after exposure to peer suicidal behavior. Clinicians should assess for exposure to suicidal behaviors in their patients.
BACKGROUND: Assortative relating is a proposed explanation for the increased occurrence of suicidal behavior among those exposed to suicidal peers. This explanation proposes that high-risk individuals associate with each other, and shared risk factors explain the effect. METHODS: Data were obtained from the ADDhealth longitudinal survey waves I and II (n=4834 school attending adolescents). People who reported peer suicidal behavior in the first wave were identified and classified as the exposure group. Potentially confounding variables were identified, and propensity scores were calculated for the exposure variable using logistic regression. Inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted regression estimated the effect of exposure on the risk for a suicide attempt during the first two waves. RESULTS: Weighted analysis showed that the group exposed to a friend's suicide attempt had a higher occurrence of suicide attempts in both waves. Exposure to peer suicide attempts was associated with increased suicide attempts at baseline (RR=1.93; 95%CI= 1.23-3.04) and 1-year follow-up (RR=1.70; 95%CI= 1.12-2.60). LIMITATION: Only two consecutive years of data are provided. Misclassification and recall bias are possible due to the use of self-report. The outcome may be misclassified due to respondent misunderstanding of what constitutes a suicide attempts, versus non-suicidal self-injury. Non-response and trimming reduced the sample size significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Assortative relating did not account for all the variance and is currently not sufficient to explain the increased risk after exposure to peer suicidal behavior. Clinicians should assess for exposure to suicidal behaviors in their patients.
Authors: Anna R Van Meter; Guillermo Perez Algorta; Eric A Youngstrom; Yana Lechtman; Jen K Youngstrom; Norah C Feeny; Robert L Findling Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Nathan A Kimbrel; Michelle L Pennington; Claire M Cammarata; Frank Leto; William J Ostiguy; Suzy B Gulliver Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2016-07-02
Authors: Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger; Shane Kuhlman; Lawrence Christian Elledge; Phillip N Smith; Gregory L Stuart Journal: Psychol Violence Date: 2018-01-18
Authors: LaDonna L Gleason; Ansley M Bender; Jason I Chen; Melanie Bozzay; Renee Hangartner; Gabriela Romero; Christa D Labouliere; Meredith Elzy; Kimberley Gryglewicz; Marc S Karver Journal: School Ment Health Date: 2021-06-22
Authors: Madelyn S Gould; Alison M Lake; Marjorie Kleinman; Hanga Galfalvy; Saba Chowdhury; Alison Madnick Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nicole T M Hill; Jo Robinson; Jane Pirkis; Karl Andriessen; Karolina Krysinska; Amber Payne; Alexandra Boland; Alison Clarke; Allison Milner; Katrina Witt; Stephan Krohn; Amit Lampit Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Elizabeth A Swedo; Jennifer L Beauregard; Sietske de Fijter; Luke Werhan; Kirkland Norris; Martha P Montgomery; Erica B Rose; Corinne David-Ferdon; Greta M Massetti; Susan D Hillis; Steven A Sumner Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Laura H Thompson; Justin J Lang; Brieanne Olibris; Amélie Gauthier-Beaupré; Heather Cook; Dakota Gillies; Heather Orpana Journal: Int J Ment Health Syst Date: 2020-04-03