Jennifer A Febbo1, Mauricio S Galizia2, Ian G Murphy3, Andrada Popescu4, Xiaoming Bi5, Alexander Turin3, Jeremy Collins3, Michael Markl6, Robert R Edelman7, James C Carr3. 1. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: febbo.jennifer@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Department of Medical Imaging, Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Cardiovascular MR R&D, Siemens Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 7. Department of Radiology, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate magnetic resonance angiography sequences during the contrast steady-state (SS-MRA) using inversion recovery (IR) with fast low-angle shot (IR-FLASH) or steady-state free precession (IR-SSFP) read-outs, following the injection of a blood-pool contrast agent, and compare them to first-pass MR angiography (FP-MRA) in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three adult patients with CHD who underwent both SS-MRA and FP-MRA using a 1.5-T scanner were retrospectively identified. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were obtained at eight locations within the aorta and pulmonary vessels.. Image quality and the presence of artifacts were subjectively assessed by two radiologists. The presence of pathology was noted and given a confidence score. RESULTS: There was no difference in vessel dimensions among the sequences. IR-SSFP showed better image quality and fewer artifacts than IR-FLASH and FP-MRA. Confidence scores were significantly higher for SS-MRA compared to FP-MRA. Seven cases (30.4%) had findings detected at SS-MRA that were not detected at FP-MRA, and 2 cases (8.7%) had findings detected by IR-SSFP only. CONCLUSION: SS-MRA of the thoracic vasculature using a blood pool contrast agent offers superior image quality and reveals more abnormalities compared to standard FP-MRA in adults with CHD, and it is best achieved with an IR-SSFP sequence. These sequences could lead to increased detection rates of abnormalities and provide a simpler protocol image acquisition.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate magnetic resonance angiography sequences during the contrast steady-state (SS-MRA) using inversion recovery (IR) with fast low-angle shot (IR-FLASH) or steady-state free precession (IR-SSFP) read-outs, following the injection of a blood-pool contrast agent, and compare them to first-pass MR angiography (FP-MRA) in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three adult patients with CHD who underwent both SS-MRA and FP-MRA using a 1.5-T scanner were retrospectively identified. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were obtained at eight locations within the aorta and pulmonary vessels.. Image quality and the presence of artifacts were subjectively assessed by two radiologists. The presence of pathology was noted and given a confidence score. RESULTS: There was no difference in vessel dimensions among the sequences. IR-SSFP showed better image quality and fewer artifacts than IR-FLASH and FP-MRA. Confidence scores were significantly higher for SS-MRA compared to FP-MRA. Seven cases (30.4%) had findings detected at SS-MRA that were not detected at FP-MRA, and 2 cases (8.7%) had findings detected by IR-SSFP only. CONCLUSION: SS-MRA of the thoracic vasculature using a blood pool contrast agent offers superior image quality and reveals more abnormalities compared to standard FP-MRA in adults with CHD, and it is best achieved with an IR-SSFP sequence. These sequences could lead to increased detection rates of abnormalities and provide a simpler protocol image acquisition.
Authors: Christopher Z Lam; Joseph J Pagano; Navjot Gill; Logi Vidarsson; Regina de la Mora; Mike Seed; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Shi-Joon Yoo Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2018-11-15
Authors: Kim-Lien Nguyen; Fei Han; Ziwu Zhou; Daniel Z Brunengraber; Ihab Ayad; Daniel S Levi; Gary M Satou; Brian L Reemtsen; Peng Hu; J Paul Finn Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 5.364