Literature DB >> 26253351

Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: is optimal positioning of the bone block and screws possible? A prospective computed tomography scan analysis.

Jean Kany1, Olivier Flamand2, Jean Grimberg3, Régis Guinand4, Pierre Croutzet4, Rajkumar Amaravathi5, Padmanaban Sekaran6.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure could be performed with accurate bone block positioning and screw fixation with a similar rate of complications to the open Latarjet procedure.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 105 shoulders (104 patients) underwent the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure performed by the same senior surgeon. The day after surgery, an independent surgeon examiner performed a multiplanar bidimensional computed tomography scan analysis. We also evaluated our learning curve by comparing 2 chronologic periods (30 procedures performed in each period), separated by an interval during which 45 procedures were performed.
RESULTS: Of the 105 shoulders included in the study, 95 (90.5%) (94 patients) were evaluated. The coracoid graft was accurately positioned relative to the equator of the glenoid surface in 87 of 95 shoulders (91.5%). Accurate bone-block positioning on the axial view with "circle" evaluation was obtained for 77 of 95 shoulders (81%). This procedure was performed in a lateralized position in 7 of 95 shoulders (7.3%) and in a medialized position in 11 shoulders (11.6%). The mean screw angulation with the glenoid surface was 21°. One patient had transient axillary nerve palsy. Of the initial 104 patients, 3 (2.8%) underwent revision. The analysis of our results indicated that the screw-glenoid surface angle significantly predicted the accuracy of the bone-block positioning (P = .001). Our learning curve estimates showed that, compared with our initial period, the average surgical time decreased, and the risk of lateralization showed a statistically significant decrease during the last period (P = .006).
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that accurate positioning of the bone block onto the anterior aspect of the glenoid is possible, safe, and reproducible with the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure without additional complications compared with open surgery.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic Latarjet; CT scan analysis; bone block; shoulder instability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26253351     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  20 in total

1.  Arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with subscapularis augmentation (ASA) versus open Latarjet to treat recurrent anterior shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone loss: clinical comparison of two series.

Authors:  R Russo; G Della Rotonda; F Cautiero; M Ciccarelli; M Maiotti; C Massoni; F Di Pietto; M Zappia
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-21

2.  Reliability of a CT reconstruction for preoperative surgical planning in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  Alexandre Hardy; Philippe Loriaut; Benjamin Granger; Ahmed Neffati; Audrey Massein; Laurent Casabianca; Hugues Pascal-Moussellard; Antoine Gerometta
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Preoperative CT planning of screw length in arthroscopic Latarjet.

Authors:  Alexandre Hardy; Antoine Gerometta; Benjamin Granger; Audrey Massein; Laurent Casabianca; Hugues Pascal-Moussellard; Philippe Loriaut
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)-computed tomography evaluation at a short term follow-up. Part II.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Kordasiewicz; Maciej Kicinski; Konrad Małachowski; Janusz Wieczorek; Sławomir Chaberek; Stanisław Pomianowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [An arthroscopic "inlay" Bristow procedure with suture button fixation: Surgical technique and radiology evaluation].

Authors:  Z X Shao; Q F Song; Y Q Zhao; G Q Cui
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-10-18

6.  The Latarjet procedure in competitive athletes younger than 20 years old with a significant glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Luciano A Rossi; Ignacio Tanoira; María G Bruchmann; Ignacio Pasqualini; Maximiliano Ranalletta
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-23

7.  Arthroscopic treatment of glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Ettore Taverna; Guido Garavaglia; Henri Ufenast; Riccardo D'Ambrosi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis.

Authors:  G Cunningham; S Benchouk; O Kherad; A Lädermann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Can a Drill Guide Improve the Coracoid Graft Placement During the Latarjet Procedure? A Prospective Comparative Study With the Freehand Technique.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Achilleas Boutsiadis; Lionel Neyton; Laurent Lafosse; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-20

10.  Soft Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure: Technical Note on Biceps Tendon as a Modified Sling for Restoration of Glenohumeral Stability.

Authors:  Amr Abdel-Mordy Kandeel
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.