| Literature DB >> 26253116 |
Dmitry G Deryabin1, Ludmila V Efremova2,3, Alexey S Vasilchenko4,5, Evgeniya V Saidakova6, Elena A Sizova7,8, Pavel A Troshin9, Alexander V Zhilenkov10, Ekaterina A Khakina11, Ekaterina E Khakina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The cause-effect relationships between physicochemical properties of amphiphilic [60]fullerene derivatives and their toxicity against bacterial cells have not yet been clarified. In this study, we report how the differences in the chemical structure of organic addends in 10 originally synthesized penta-substituted [60]fullerene derivatives modulate their zeta potential and aggregate's size in salt-free and salt-added aqueous suspensions as well as how these physicochemical characteristics affect the bioenergetics of freshwater Escherichia coli and marine Photobacterium phosphoreum bacteria. Dynamic light scattering, laser Doppler micro-electrophoresis, agarose gel electrophoresis, atomic force microscopy, and bioluminescence inhibition assay were used to characterize the fullerene aggregation behavior in aqueous solution and their interaction with the bacterial cell surface, following zeta potential changes and toxic effects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26253116 PMCID: PMC4528854 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-015-0112-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
The structural formulas of penta-substituted [60]fullerene derivatives used in this study
Fig. 1Example of size and zeta potential distribution in the aqueous suspension of F8 penta-substituted [60]fullerene derivative. a The diameter of F8 aggregates is 5.2 ± 0.9 nm; b the zeta potential value is +52.2 ± 10.6 mV.
Fig. 2The graph illustrates distribution of particles size and zeta potential values of [60]fullerene derivatives in aqueous suspension. Data analysis with (a) and without (b) the negative and positive sign of the particles’ surface charge. White circles negatively charged compounds; black circles positively charged compounds.
Fig. 3Electrophoretic mobility and aggregation behavior of [60]fullerene derivatives in salt-free and salt-added (2% NaCl) systems. Electroforetic mobility data of F1–F10 compounds in salt-free (a) and salt-added (b) agarose gel show zeta potential neutralization by high electrolyte concentration. The diameter and polydispersivity parameters (c) show the aggregation behavior of F1–F10 compounds in salt-added suspension (black circles) in comparison with salt-free suspension (white circles).
Fig. 4The toxicity of [60]fullerene derivatives evaluated with bioluminescence inhibition assay. The examples of E. coli K12 TG1 lac::luxCDABE luminescence time course during contact with aqueous suspensions of F10 (a) and F8 (b) compounds, and the dose–response curves described the changes in the bioluminescence inhibition indexes caused by differing content of penta-substituted [60]fullerene derivatives’ (c). Designations (a, b): ordinate—bioluminescence, RLU; abscissa—time measurement, min. Compounds concentrations: 1 2000 μmol; 2 1000 μmol; 3 500 μmol; 4 250 μmol; 5 125 μmol; 6 62.5 μmol; 7 31.25 μmol; c control. Designations (c): ordinate—bioluminescence inhibition index, I; abscissa—[60]fullerene derivatives concentrations, μmol.
Fig. 5Contact of positively charged [60]fullerene derivatives with bacterial cell surface evaluated with AFM technique. AFM images of Escherichia coli cells in control sample (a) and treated with F6 (b), F4 (c) and F8 (d) penta-substituted [60]fullerene derivatives. The scale bar 1 μm.
Fig. 6Influence of positively charged [60]fullerene derivatives on zeta potential of Escherichia coli K12 TG1 cells. The zeta potential distribution for intact (c) and treated with toxic concentrations of F6 (1), F2 (2), F8 (3), and F4 (4) bacterial suspensions.