Literature DB >> 26253032

Probing the interaction of the ipsilateral posterior parietal cortex with the premotor cortex using a novel transcranial magnetic stimulation technique.

Jessica Shields1, Jung E Park1, Prachaya Srivanitchapoom1, Rainer Paine1, Nivethida Thirugnanasambandam1, Sahana N Kukke1, Mark Hallett2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Functional imaging studies have shown that control of planned movement involves a distributed network that involves the premotor (PMv) and posterior parietal cortices (PPC). Similarly, anatomical studies show that these regions are densely interconnected via white matter tracts. We therefore hypothesized that the PPC influence over the motor cortex is partly via a connection with the PMv.
METHODS: Using a novel three-pulse ipsilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation technique, we preconditioned the PPC (80% RMT) at ISIs from 4-15 ms prior to stimulating the PMv and M1 at ISIs of 4 and 6 ms.
RESULTS: As previously shown, PMv-M1 paired-pulse stimulation resulted in inhibition of the MEP (90% RMT, 4-6 ms) and PPC-M1 paired-pulse stimulation resulted in facilitation of the MEP (90% RMT, 4-8 ms). PPC-M1 paired-pulse stimulation at 80% RMT preconditioning had no effect on M1. PPC-PMv-M1 stimulation resulted in reversal of inhibition observed with PMv-M1 stimulation at ISIs ranging from 6 to 15 ms.
CONCLUSIONS: The reversal of inhibition observed with PPC-PMv-M1 stimulation suggests that the parietal connection to the PMv plays a role in the modulation of M1. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to stimulate three intrahemispheric regions in order to test a disynaptic connection with M1. The described network may be important in a variety of movement disorders. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Connectivity; Motor cortex; Parietal cortex; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26253032      PMCID: PMC4721936          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  22 in total

1.  Reliability of the input-output properties of the cortico-spinal pathway obtained from transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  T J Carroll; S Riek; R G Carson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to test connections to primary motor areas from frontal and medial cortex in humans.

Authors:  C Civardi; R Cantello; P Asselman; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Yale E Cohen; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Macaque ventral premotor cortex exerts powerful facilitation of motor cortex outputs to upper limb motoneurons.

Authors:  H Shimazu; M A Maier; G Cerri; P A Kirkwood; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Superior area 6 afferents from the superior parietal lobule in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  M Matelli; P Govoni; C Galletti; D F Kutz; G Luppino
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1998-12-21       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway.

Authors:  H Devanne; B A Lavoie; C Capaday
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Responses of single corticospinal neurons to intracortical stimulation of primary motor and premotor cortex in the anesthetized macaque monkey.

Authors:  Marc A Maier; Peter A Kirkwood; Thomas Brochier; Roger N Lemon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A novel dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm to probe fast facilitatory inputs from ipsilateral dorsal premotor cortex to primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Sergiu Groppa; Nicole Werner-Petroll; Alexander Münchau; Günther Deuschl; Matthew F S Ruschworth; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Mapping different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor networks using twin Coil TMS.

Authors:  Anke Ninija Karabanov; Chi-Chao Chao; Rainer Paine; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Efficient and reliable characterization of the corticospinal system using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sahana N Kukke; Rainer W Paine; Chi-Chao Chao; Ana C de Campos; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.177

View more
  5 in total

1.  Phenotype- and genotype-specific structural alterations in spasmodic dysphonia.

Authors:  Serena Bianchi; Giovanni Battistella; Hailey Huddleston; Rebecca Scharf; Lazar Fleysher; Anna F Rumbach; Steven J Frucht; Andrew Blitzer; Laurie J Ozelius; Kristina Simonyan
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 2.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to assessment of brain connectivity and networks.

Authors:  Mark Hallett; Riccardo Di Iorio; Paolo Maria Rossini; Jung E Park; Robert Chen; Pablo Celnik; Antonio P Strafella; Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Impairment of a parieto-premotor network specialized for handwriting in writer's cramp.

Authors:  Cecile Gallea; Silvina G Horovitz; Muslimah 'Ali Najee-Ullah; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Task-specific interhemispheric hypoconnectivity in writer's cramp - An EEG study.

Authors:  Nivethida Thirugnanasambandam; Tyler Zimmerman; Ajay S Pillai; Jessica Shields; Silvina G Horovitz; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  I-waves in motor cortex revisited.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.