Literature DB >> 26252837

A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyography Amplitude in the Parallel, Full, and Front Squat Variations in Resistance-Trained Females.

Bret Contreras1, Andrew D Vigotsky, Brad J Schoenfeld, Chris Beardsley, John Cronin.   

Abstract

Front, full, and parallel squats are some of the most popular squat variations. The purpose of this investigation was to compare mean and peak electromyography (EMG) amplitude of the upper gluteus maximus, lower gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis of front, full, and parallel squats. Thirteen healthy women (age = 28.9 ± 5.1 y; height = 164 ± 6.3 cm; body mass = 58.2 ± 6.4 kg) performed 10 repetitions of their estimated 10-repetition maximum of each respective variation. There were no statistical (P ≤ .05) differences between full, front, and parallel squats in any of the tested muscles. Given these findings, it can be concluded that the front, full, or parallel squat can be performed for similar EMG amplitudes. However, given the results of previous research, it is recommended that individuals use a full range of motion when squatting, assuming full range can be safely achieved, to promote more favorable training adaptations. Furthermore, despite requiring lighter loads, the front squat may provide a similar training stimulus to the back squat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26252837     DOI: 10.1123/jab.2015-0113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  11 in total

1.  Muscle Activity Pattern with A Shifted Center of Pressure during the Squat Exercise.

Authors:  Tetsuro Kitamura; Akira Kido; Yukako Ishida; Yasuyo Kobayashi; Shinji Tsukamoto; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Biomechanical Differences Between the Bulgarian Split-Squat and Back Squat.

Authors:  Ethan R Mackey; Bryan L Riemann
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

3.  Universal spectral profile and dynamic evolution of muscle activation: a hallmark of muscle type and physiological state.

Authors:  Sergi Garcia-Retortillo; Rossella Rizzo; Jilin W J L Wang; Carol Sitges; Plamen Ch Ivanov
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-07-16

Review 4.  Gluteus Maximus Activation during Common Strength and Hypertrophy Exercises: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Walter Krause Neto; Enrico Gori Soares; Thais Lima Vieira; Rodolfo Aguiar; Thiago Andrade Chola; Vinicius de Lima Sampaio; Eliane Florencio Gama
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Influence of Trunk Position during Three Lunge Exercises on Muscular Activation in Trained Women.

Authors:  Ewertton DE S Bezerra; Fernando Diefenthaeler; João Pedro Nunes; Raphael L Sakugawa; Isabel Heberle; Bruno M Moura; Antônio R P Moro; Giuseppe Marcolin; Antonio Paoli
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

6.  Muscle Oxygen Demands of the Vastus Lateralis in Back and Front Squats.

Authors:  Patrick R Davis; John P Yakel; Deven J F Anderson
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-05-01

7.  Kinematic and Electromyographic Activity Changes during Back Squat with Submaximal and Maximal Loading.

Authors:  Hasan U Yavuz; Deniz Erdag
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.781

8.  Electromyographic activity of selected trunk, core, and thigh muscles in commonly used exercises for ACL rehabilitation.

Authors:  Omid A Khaiyat; Jessica Norris
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-04-20

9.  Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat.

Authors:  Michal Murawa; Anna Fryzowicz; Jaroslaw Kabacinski; Jakub Jurga; Joanna Gorwa; Manuela Galli; Matteo Zago
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Balance and Lower Limb Muscle Activation between In-Line and Traditional Lunge Exercises.

Authors:  Paulo H Marchetti; Mauro A Guiselini; Josinaldo J da Silva; Raymond Tucker; David G Behm; Lee E Brown
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.