Literature DB >> 2625209

The influence of stimulus size on perimetric detection of small scotomata.

T Bek1, H Lund-Andersen.   

Abstract

The influence of perimetric stimulus size on the detection of small scotomata was examined, and the blind spot was used as a paradigm of a small scotoma. A customized point pattern for perimetry was created on a Humphrey field analyzer. The point pattern had a density of 1.4 degrees and was arranged in a grid in the area of the blind spot. Four normal persons were tested with full-threshold strategy in the points of this grid using Goldmann stimulus sizes ranging from I to V. The delimitation of the blind spot was found to depend strongly on stimulus size. For small stimulus sizes, the blind spot could be delimited as an absolute scotoma with almost sharp borders. However, with larger spot sizes a relative scotoma zone gradually developed, extending centrally from the borders of the blind spot. The central absolute scotoma component of the blind spot totally disappeared for the largest stimulus sizes. We could establish that some of these larger stimuli would be projected totally within the optic nerve head, if perfect imaging through the refractive media of the eye, was assumed. We interpret our findings to be a result of light scattering in the refractive media of the eye, causing a blur to appear around the image of the light stimulus at the retinal plane. We conclude that perimetric resolution power is highly dependent on stimulus size. The smallest stimulus size possible should be used when dense stimulus patterns are used for perimetric detection of small scotomata.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2625209     DOI: 10.1007/bf02169446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  2 in total

1.  The size and location of the normal blind spot.

Authors:  M F Armaly
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-02

2.  [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].

Authors:  E Gramer; D Kontić; G K Krieglstein
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.250

  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  Blind spot size depends on the optic disc topography: a study using SLO controlled scotometry and the Heidelberg retina tomograph.

Authors:  J H Meyer; M Guhlmann; J Funk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Diabetes and retinal function.

Authors:  J A Roth
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Localised blood-retinal barrier leakage and retinal light sensitivity in diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  T Bek; H Lund-Andersen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Cotton-wool spots and retinal light sensitivity in diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  T Bek; H Lund-Andersen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  Functional and cortical adaptations to central vision loss.

Authors:  Sing-Hang Cheung; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 6.  The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Michael Yapp; Nagi Assaad; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Comparison of defect depths for sinusoidal and circular perimetric stimuli in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Brett J King
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.117

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.