F Zink 1 , W Kratzer 1 , S Schmidt 2 , S Oeztuerk 1 , R A Mason 3 , M Porzner 1 , J Klaus 1 , M M Haenle 1 , T Graeter 2 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: To verify the reproducibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantification results of two different high-end ultrasound systems and to evaluate the clinical utility of the method in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 18 patients with histologically confirmed CD (36.8 % women, 63.2 % men; mean age 43.7 ± 14.1 years) and wall segments thicker than 5 mm were recruited. CEUS quantification and conventional ultrasound investigation were performed under standardized settings using Toshiba Aplio500 and Siemens Acuson S3000 high-end ultrasound systems. CEUS was performed at a low mechanical index of 0.1 after bolus application of 4.8 ml of SonoVue(®) contrast medium. The recorded DICOM clips were quantified using VueBox(®) (version 4.3) calculating 11 quantitative parameters. Subsequently, CEUS quantification and conventional ultrasound results were analyzed. RESULTS: Correlation of quantitative parameters between the Aplio500 and AcusonS3000 systems for peak enhancement (PE), rise time (RT), wash-in-rate (WiR) and quality of fit (QOF) yielded significance levels of p < 0.05 and p < 0.0001 for wash-in-wash-out area under the curve (WiWoAUC). Spearman rank test showed moderate levels of correlation for PE, RT, WiR and QOF (r = 0.5, 0.49, 0.49 and 0.5 respectively), and high correlation for WiWoAUC (r = 0.89) between the two ultrasound systems. CONCLUSION: Due to multiple uncontrollable affecting factors, the method of CEUS quantification by VueBox in the intestine cannot be recommended for device-independent multicenter studies. Therefore we suggest to use identical ultrasound systems and probes as well as to establish adequate reference ROIS, like a AIF-ROI. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
PURPOSE: To verify the reproducibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantification results of two different high-end ultrasound systems and to evaluate the clinical utility of the method in patients with Crohn's disease (CD ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 18 patients with histologically confirmed CD (36.8 % women , 63.2 % men ; mean age 43.7 ± 14.1 years) and wall segments thicker than 5 mm were recruited. CEUS quantification and conventional ultrasound investigation were performed under standardized settings using Toshiba Aplio500 and Siemens Acuson S3000 high-end ultrasound systems. CEUS was performed at a low mechanical index of 0.1 after bolus application of 4.8 ml of SonoVue(®) contrast medium. The recorded DICOM clips were quantified using VueBox(®) (version 4.3) calculating 11 quantitative parameters. Subsequently, CEUS quantification and conventional ultrasound results were analyzed. RESULTS: Correlation of quantitative parameters between the Aplio500 and AcusonS3000 systems for peak enhancement (PE), rise time (RT), wash-in-rate (WiR) and quality of fit (QOF) yielded significance levels of p < 0.05 and p < 0.0001 for wash-in-wash-out area under the curve (WiWoAUC). Spearman rank test showed moderate levels of correlation for PE, RT, WiR and QOF (r = 0.5, 0.49, 0.49 and 0.5 respectively), and high correlation for WiWoAUC (r = 0.89) between the two ultrasound systems. CONCLUSION: Due to multiple uncontrollable affecting factors, the method of CEUS quantification by VueBox in the intestine cannot be recommended for device-independent multicenter studies. Therefore we suggest to use identical ultrasound systems and probes as well as to establish adequate reference ROIS, like a AIF-ROI. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Disease
Species
Mesh： See more »
Substances： See more »
Year: 2015
PMID： 26251995 DOI： 10.1055/s-0034-1398746
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultraschall Med ISSN： 0172-4614 Impact factor: 6.548