Literature DB >> 26251506

A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department.

Medley O'Keefe Gatewood1, Matthew Wemple2, Sheryl Greco3, Patricia A Kritek4, Raghu Durvasula5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis causes substantial morbidity and mortality in hospitalised patients. Although many studies describe the use of protocols in the management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, few have addressed emergency department (ED) screening and management for patients initially presenting with uncomplicated sepsis (ie, patients without organ failure or hypotension).
OBJECTIVE: A quality improvement task force at a large, quaternary care referral hospital sought to develop a protocol focusing on early identification of patients with uncomplicated sepsis, in addition to severe sepsis and septic shock. INTERVENTION: The three-tiered intervention consisted of (1) a nurse-driven screening tool and management protocol to identify and initiate early treatment of patients with sepsis, (2) a computer-assisted screening algorithm that generated a 'Sepsis Alert' pop-up screen in the electronic medical record for treating clinical healthcare providers and (3) automated suggested sepsis-specific order sets for initial workup and resuscitation, antibiotic selection and goal-directed therapy.
DESIGN: A before and after retrospective cohort study was undertaken to determine the intervention's impact on compliance with recommended sepsis management, including serum lactate measured in the ED, 2 L of intravenous fluid administered within 2 h of triage, antibiotics administered within 3 h of triage and blood cultures drawn before antibiotic administration. Mortality rates for patients in the ED with a sepsis-designated ICD-9 code present on admission were also analysed.
RESULTS: Overall bundle compliance increased by 154%, from 28% at baseline to 71% in the last quarter of the study (p<0.001). Bundle, antibiotic and intravenous fluid compliance all increased significantly after launch of the sepsis initiative (eg, bundle and intravenous fluid compliance increased by 74% and 54%, respectively; p<0.001). Bundle and antibiotic compliance both showed further significant increases after implementation of suggested order sets (31% and 25% increases, respectively; p<0.001). The mortality rate for patients in the ED admitted with sepsis was 13.3% before implementation and fell to 11.1% after (p=0.230); mortality in the last two quarters of the study was 9.3% (p=0.107).
CONCLUSIONS: The new protocol demonstrates that early screening interventions can lead to expedited delivery of care to patients with sepsis in the ED and could serve as a model for other facilities. Mortality was not significantly improved by our intervention, which included patients with uncomplicated sepsis. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical care; Emergency department; Information technology; Performance measures; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26251506     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  32 in total

1.  A Framework to Tackle Risk Identification and Presentation Challenges in Sepsis.

Authors:  Muge Capan; Danielle Mosby; Kristen Miller; Jun Tao; Pan Wu; William Weintraub; Rebecca Kowalski; Ryan Arnold
Journal:  Am J Hosp Med       Date:  2018-02-16

2.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Vital signs analysis algorithm detects inflammatory response in premature infants with late onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  Leena B Mithal; Ram Yogev; Hannah L Palac; Daniel Kaminsky; Ilan Gur; Karen K Mestan
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effectiveness of automated alerting system compared to usual care for the management of sepsis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Lin Chen; Ping Xu; Qing Wang; Jianjun Zhang; Kun Chen; Casey M Clements; Leo Anthony Celi; Vitaly Herasevich; Yucai Hong
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-07-19

5.  Association of triage hypothermia with in-hospital mortality among patients in the emergency department with suspected sepsis.

Authors:  Sriram Ramgopal; Christopher M Horvat; Mark D Adler
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.425

6.  Bacteraemia in emergency departments: effective antibiotic reassessment is associated with a better outcome.

Authors:  Charlotte Aillet; Didier Jammes; Agnès Fribourg; Sophie Léotard; Olivier Pellat; Patricia Etienne; Dominique Néri; Djamel Lameche; Olivier Pantaloni; Serge Tournoud; Pierre-Marie Roger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Considerations for Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock in an Era of Antimicrobial Resistance.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Strich; Emily L Heil; Henry Masur
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  The Modified Early Warning Score: A Useful Marker of Neurological Worsening but Unreliable Predictor of Sepsis in the Neurocritically Ill-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jeannette Hester; Teddy S Youn; Erin Trifilio; Christopher P Robinson; Marc-Alain Babi; Pouya Ameli; William Roth; Sebastian Gatica; Michael A Pizzi; Aimee Gennaro; Charles Crescioni; Carolina B Maciel; Katharina M Busl
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  Analysis of a new best-practice advisory on time to initiation of antibiotics in surgical intensive care unit patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Tyler Chanas; David Volles; Rob Sawyer; Stephanie Mallow-Corbett
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2018-03-29

Review 10.  Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: insights and comparisons to ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE.

Authors:  H Bryant Nguyen; Anja Kathrin Jaehne; Namita Jayaprakash; Matthew W Semler; Sara Hegab; Angel Coz Yataco; Geneva Tatem; Dhafer Salem; Steven Moore; Kamran Boka; Jasreen Kaur Gill; Jayna Gardner-Gray; Jacqueline Pflaum; Juan Pablo Domecq; Gina Hurst; Justin B Belsky; Raymond Fowkes; Ronald B Elkin; Steven Q Simpson; Jay L Falk; Daniel J Singer; Emanuel P Rivers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.