Literature DB >> 26251436

Differentiation between Cystic Pituitary Adenomas and Rathke Cleft Cysts: A Diagnostic Model Using MRI.

M Park1, S-K Lee1, J Choi2, S-H Kim3, S H Kim4, N-Y Shin5, J Kim1, S S Ahn6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Cystic pituitary adenomas may mimic Rathke cleft cysts when there is no solid enhancing component found on MR imaging, and preoperative differentiation may enable a more appropriate selection of treatment strategies. We investigated the diagnostic potential of MR imaging features to differentiate cystic pituitary adenomas from Rathke cleft cysts and to develop a diagnostic model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 54 patients with a cystic pituitary adenoma (40 women; mean age, 37.7 years) and 28 with a Rathke cleft cyst (18 women; mean age, 31.5 years) who underwent MR imaging followed by surgery. The following imaging features were assessed: the presence or absence of a fluid-fluid level, a hypointense rim on T2-weighted images, septation, an off-midline location, the presence or absence of an intracystic nodule, size change, and signal change. On the basis of the results of logistic regression analysis, a diagnostic tree model was developed to differentiate between cystic pituitary adenomas and Rathke cleft cysts. External validation was performed for an additional 16 patients with a cystic pituitary adenoma and 8 patients with a Rathke cleft cyst.
RESULTS: The presence of a fluid-fluid level, a hypointense rim on T2-weighted images, septation, and an off-midline location were more common with pituitary adenomas, whereas the presence of an intracystic nodule was more common with Rathke cleft cysts. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that cystic pituitary adenomas and Rathke cleft cysts can be distinguished on the basis of the presence of a fluid-fluid level, septation, an off-midline location, and the presence of an intracystic nodule (P = .006, .032, .001, and .023, respectively). Among 24 patients in the external validation population, 22 were classified correctly on the basis of the diagnostic tree model used in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: A systematic approach using this diagnostic tree model can be helpful in distinguishing cystic pituitary adenomas from Rathke cleft cysts.
© 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26251436      PMCID: PMC7965051          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  35 in total

Review 1.  Craniopharyngioma and other cystic epithelial lesions of the sellar region: a review of clinical, imaging, and histopathological relationships.

Authors:  Gabriel Zada; Ning Lin; Eric Ojerholm; Shakti Ramkissoon; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 2.  Imaging of sellar and parasellar lesions.

Authors:  Janine Rennert; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Jean-François Bonneville; Fabrice Bonneville; Françoise Cattin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Fluid-fluid level in pituitary tumors: analysis of management of 106 cases.

Authors:  Atul Goel; Abhidha Shah; Sukhdeep Singh Jhawar; Naina K Goel
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Pituitary adenomas: high-resolution MR imaging at 1.5 T.

Authors:  W Kucharczyk; D O Davis; W M Kelly; G Sze; D Norman; T H Newton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of pituitary tumours.

Authors:  Michael Buchfelder; Sven Schlaffer
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.690

7.  Hemorrhage in pituitary adenoma: correlation of MR imaging with operative findings.

Authors:  N Kurihara; S Takahashi; S Higano; H Ikeda; S Mugikura; L N Singh; S Furuta; H Tamura; T Ishibashi; S Maruoka; S Yamada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  MR imaging of the sellar and juxtasellar regions.

Authors:  D E Johnsen; W W Woodruff; I S Allen; P J Cera; G R Funkhouser; L L Coleman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  MR appearance and cyst content of Rathke cleft cysts.

Authors:  S Asari; T Ito; S Tsuchida; T Tsutsui
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Rathke's cleft cyst: clinicopathological and MRI findings in 22 patients.

Authors:  L Wen; L-b Hu; X-y Feng; G Desai; D Gaurav; L-g Zou; W-x Wang; D Zhang
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  15 in total

1.  Hemorrhagic Pituitary Adenoma versus Rathke Cleft Cyst: A Frequent Dilemma.

Authors:  J-F Bonneville
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Management of cystic prolactinomas: a review.

Authors:  Afif Nakhleh; Naim Shehadeh; Irit Hochberg; Moshe Zloczower; Sagit Zolotov; Riad Taher; Deeb Daoud Naccache
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  MRI criteria of subtypes of adenomas and epithelial cysts of the pituitary gland.

Authors:  Stefanie Bette; Vicki M Butenschön; Benedikt Wiestler; Alexander von Werder; Roland M Schmid; Jens Lehmberg; Claus Zimmer; Bernhard Meyer; Jan S Kirschke; Jens Gempt
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  MR-Based Radiomics for Differential Diagnosis between Cystic Pituitary Adenoma and Rathke Cleft Cyst.

Authors:  Yanping Wang; Sixuan Chen; Feng Shi; Xiaoqing Cheng; Qiang Xu; Jianrui Li; Song Luo; Pengbo Jiang; Ying Wei; Changsheng Zhou; Lijuan Zheng; Kaiwei Xia; Guangming Lu; Zhiqiang Zhang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  Reply.

Authors:  M Park; S S Ahn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Joint approach based on clinical and imaging features to distinguish non-neoplastic from neoplastic pituitary stalk lesions.

Authors:  Ji Ye Lee; Ji Eun Park; Woo Hyun Shim; Seung Chai Jung; Choong Gon Choi; Sang Joon Kim; Jeong Hoon Kim; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Characterization of Rathke's Cleft Cysts (RCCs): Relevance to the Differential Diagnosis of Pituitary Adenomas and RCCs.

Authors:  Omkar B Ijare; Martyn A Sharpe; David S Baskin; Kumar Pichumani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Application of Contrast-Enhanced 3-Dimensional T2-Weighted Volume Isotropic Turbo Spin Echo Acquisition Sequence in the Diagnosis of Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Microadenomas.

Authors:  Rui Guo; Yue Wu; Guangcheng Guo; Haiyang Zhou; Shoutang Liu; Zhenwei Yao; Yunping Xiao
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Pituitary apoplexy without chiasm compression: A case report.

Authors:  Martin Kynčl; Zdeněk Kasl; Štěpán Rusňák; Marketa Sobotová; Michal Krčma; Jaroslav Tintěra; Martin Fůs; Jan Lešták
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-30

10.  Cyst Type Differentiates Rathke Cleft Cysts From Cystic Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Sherwin Tavakol; Michael P Catalino; David J Cote; Xian Boles; Edward R Laws; Wenya Linda Bi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.