Literature DB >> 26251182

Duration of Heart Failure Is an Important Predictor of Outcomes After Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Renzo Y Loyaga-Rendon1, Deepak Acharya2, Salpy V Pamboukian2, Jose A Tallaj2, Ryan Cantor2, Randall C Starling2, David C Naftel2, James K Kirklin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) progression results in worsening functional capacity and end-organ compromise. HF may occur acutely or be associated with a chronic presentation. We hypothesized that the duration of HF affects outcomes after mechanical circulatory support. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 10 730 patients registered in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) who received primary implant of a mechanical circulatory support device were stratified according to the duration of HF symptoms: acute HF (AHF; ≤1 month), sub-AHF (1-12 months), and chronic HF (Cr-HF; ≥ 12 months). AHF patients were younger with a higher proportion of women and white and with a lower prevalence of peripheral vascular disease and history of prior cardiac surgeries. Sixty percent of AHF patients were INTERMACS profile 1 at the time of implantation versus 24% and 13.2% in the sub-AHF and Cr-HF groups, respectively (P=0.0001). Patients with AHF had the highest utilization of biventricular support (14.4%). The estimated survival at 4 years was 58%, 51%, and 45% for the AHF, sub-AHF, and Cr-HF patients (P=0.006). The proportion of patients with AHF who received heart transplantation at 1 year was 29% compared with 22.6% in the patients with Cr-HF. After adjustment for known risk factors of adverse outcome, patients with AHF have a better late phase prognosis compared with patients with Cr-HF (hazard ratio, 0.34; P=0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS: The duration of HF before durable mechanical circulatory support implant is an important variable influencing outcome. Patients with AHF had improved survival at 4 years and higher rates of transplantation at 1 year despite higher acuity of presentation.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart failure; heart transplantation; humans; risk factors; ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26251182     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  4 in total

1.  Ventricular Assist Device in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Deepak Acharya; Renzo Y Loyaga-Rendon; Salpy V Pamboukian; José A Tallaj; William L Holman; Ryan S Cantor; David C Naftel; James K Kirklin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Association of heart failure duration with clinical prognosis in advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Atsushi Sugiura; Hideki Kitahara; Togo Iwahana; Noriko Suzuki; Sho Okada; Hideyuki Miyauchi; Yoshio Kobayashi; Nikos Werner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Heart failure in the young: Insights into myocardial recovery with ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Eva Maria Javier Delmo; Mariano Francisco Del Maria Javier; Dietmar Böthig; Andre Rüffer; Robert Cesnjevar; Michael Dandel; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-02

Review 4.  'Time is prognosis' in heart failure: time-to-treatment initiation as a modifiable risk factor.

Authors:  Amr Abdin; Stefan D Anker; Javed Butler; Andrew J Stewart Coats; Ingrid Kindermann; Mitja Lainscak; Lars H Lund; Marco Metra; Wilfried Mullens; Giuseppe Rosano; Jonathan Slawik; Jan Wintrich; Michael Böhm
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-10-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.