Simon Finnigan1, Andrew Wong2, Stephen Read2. 1. UQ Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Allied Health Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: finnigan.simon@gmail.com. 2. School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Acute Stroke Unit, Neurology Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) indices sensitive to abnormal slow (relative to faster) activity power seem uniquely informative for clinical management of ischaemic stroke (IS), including around acute reperfusion therapies. However these have not been compared between IS and control samples. The primary objective was to identify the QEEG slowing index and threshold value which can most accurately discriminate between IS patients and controls. METHODS: The samples comprised 28 controls (mean age: 70.4; range: 56-84) and 18 patients (mean age: 69.3; range: 51-86). Seven indices were analysed: relative bandpower (delta, theta, alpha, beta), delta/alpha power ratio (DAR), (delta+theta)/(alpha+beta) ratio (DTABR) and QSLOWING. The accuracies of each index for classifying participants (IS or control) were analysed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) techniques. RESULTS: All indices differed significantly between the samples (p<.001). DAR alone exhibited optimal classifier accuracy, with a threshold of 3.7 demonstrating 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for discriminating between radiologically-confirmed, acute IS or control. DTABR and relative delta were the next most accurate classifiers. CONCLUSIONS: DAR of 3.7 demonstrated maximal accuracy for classifying all 46 participants as acute IS or control. SIGNIFICANCE: DAR assessment may inform clinical management of IS and perhaps other neurocritical patients.
OBJECTIVE: Quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) indices sensitive to abnormal slow (relative to faster) activity power seem uniquely informative for clinical management of ischaemic stroke (IS), including around acute reperfusion therapies. However these have not been compared between IS and control samples. The primary objective was to identify the QEEG slowing index and threshold value which can most accurately discriminate between IS patients and controls. METHODS: The samples comprised 28 controls (mean age: 70.4; range: 56-84) and 18 patients (mean age: 69.3; range: 51-86). Seven indices were analysed: relative bandpower (delta, theta, alpha, beta), delta/alpha power ratio (DAR), (delta+theta)/(alpha+beta) ratio (DTABR) and QSLOWING. The accuracies of each index for classifying participants (IS or control) were analysed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) techniques. RESULTS: All indices differed significantly between the samples (p<.001). DAR alone exhibited optimal classifier accuracy, with a threshold of 3.7 demonstrating 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for discriminating between radiologically-confirmed, acute IS or control. DTABR and relative delta were the next most accurate classifiers. CONCLUSIONS:DAR of 3.7 demonstrated maximal accuracy for classifying all 46 participants as acute IS or control. SIGNIFICANCE: DAR assessment may inform clinical management of IS and perhaps other neurocritical patients.
Authors: J Lanzone; M A Colombo; S Sarasso; F Zappasodi; M Rosanova; M Massimini; V Di Lazzaro; G Assenza Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Joeri B G van Wijngaarden; Riccardo Zucca; Simon Finnigan; Paul F M J Verschure Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Livia Livint Popa; Mihaela Iancu; Gheorghe Livint; Maria Balea; Constantin Dina; Vitalie Vacaras; Cristian Vladescu; Laura Balanescu; Anca Dana Buzoianu; Stefan Strilciuc; Dafin Muresanu Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 3.307