Literature DB >> 26251006

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Eugene Won1, Robert Donnino2, Monvadi B Srichai3, Steven P Sedlis1, Frederick Feit4, Linda Rolnitzky5, Louis H Miller1, Sohah N Iqbal4, Leon Axel6, Brian Nguyen4, James Slater4, Binita Shah7.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), cine imaging, and resting first-pass perfusion (FPP) in the evaluation for ischemic (IC) versus nonischemic (NIC) cardiomyopathy in new-onset heart failure with reduced (≤40%) left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). A retrospective chart review analysis identified 83 patients from January 2009 to June 2012 referred for CMR imaging evaluation for new-onset HFrEF with coronary angiography performed within 6 months of CMR. The diagnosis of IC was established using Felker criteria on coronary angiography. CMR sequences were evaluated for the presence of patterns suggestive of severe underlying coronary artery disease as the cause of HFrEF (subendocardial and/or transmural LGE, regional wall motion abnormality on cine, regional hypoperfusion defect on resting FPP). Discriminative power was assessed using receiver operator characteristics curve analysis. Coronary angiography identified 36 patients (43%) with IC. Presence of subendocardial and/or transmural LGE alone demonstrated good discriminative power (C-statistic 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.94) for the diagnosis of IC. The presence of an ischemic pattern on both LGE and cine sequences resulted in a specificity of 87% for the diagnosis of IC, whereas the absence of an ischemic pattern on both LGE and cine sequences resulted in a specificity of 94% for the diagnosis of NIC. Addition of resting FPP on a subset of patients did not improve diagnostic values. In conclusion, CMR has potential value in the diagnostic evaluation of IC versus NIC. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26251006      PMCID: PMC4567940          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Heart failure.

Authors:  Mariell Jessup; Susan Brozena
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Identification of the ischemic etiology of heart failure by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: diagnostic accuracy of late gadolinium enhancement.

Authors:  Giancarlo Casolo; Sergio Minneci; Rosanna Manta; Antonio Sulla; Jacopo Del Meglio; Luigi Rega; Gianfranco Gensini
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  2009 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Sharon Ann Hunt; William T Abraham; Marshall H Chin; Arthur M Feldman; Gary S Francis; Theodore G Ganiats; Mariell Jessup; Marvin A Konstam; Donna M Mancini; Keith Michl; John A Oates; Peter S Rahko; Marc A Silver; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  A standardized definition of ischemic cardiomyopathy for use in clinical research.

Authors:  G Michael Felker; Linda K Shaw; Christopher M O'Connor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction of uncertain etiology, using late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Carlos J Soriano; Francisco Ridocci; Jordi Estornell; Javier Jimenez; Vicente Martinez; José A De Velasco
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Impact of myocardial perfusion abnormality on prognosis in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mitsuo Sobajima; Takashi Nozawa; Takayuki Suzuki; Takashi Ohori; Takuya Shida; Akira Matsuki; Hiroshi Inoue
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  EuroHeart Failure Survey II (EHFS II): a survey on hospitalized acute heart failure patients: description of population.

Authors:  Markku S Nieminen; Dirk Brutsaert; Kenneth Dickstein; Helmut Drexler; Ferenc Follath; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Matthias Hochadel; Michel Komajda; Johan Lassus; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Piotr Ponikowski; Luigi Tavazzi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  Myocardial ischemia in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Wei Fang; Jian Zhang; Zuo-Xiang He
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.690

10.  Late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance identifies coronary artery disease as the aetiology of left ventricular dysfunction in acute new-onset congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Alfonso Valle-Muñoz; Jordi Estornell-Erill; Carlos J Soriano-Navarro; Mercedes Nadal-Barange; Nieves Martinez-Alzamora; Francisco Pomar-Domingo; Miguel Corbí-Pascual; Rafael Payá-Serrano; Francisco Ridocci-Soriano
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.