Literature DB >> 26250632

The cost-effectiveness of patient decision aids: A systematic review.

Logan Trenaman1, Stirling Bryan2, Nick Bansback3.   

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act includes provisions to encourage patient-centered care through the use of shared decision making (SDM) and patient decision aids (PtDA). PtDAs are tools that can help encourage SDM by providing information about competing treatment options and elucidating patients׳ values and preferences. Implementing PtDAs into routine practice may incur additional costs through training or increases in physician time. Prominent commentaries have proposed that these costs might be offset if patients choose less expensive options than their providers. However, the cost-effectiveness of PtDAs to date is unclear. The aim of this study was to review the economic evidence from PtDA trials. Our search identified 5347 articles, with 29 included following full-text review. Only one economic evaluation of a PtDA has been completed, which found a PtDA to be cost-saving in women with menorrhagia. Other studies included in the review indicated that PtDAs will likely increase up-front costs, but in some contexts may reduce short-term costs by reducing the uptake of invasive treatments, such as elective surgery. Few studies comprehensively captured long-term costs or measured benefits in a manner conducive to economic evaluation (QALYs or general health utilities). Our review suggests that policy makers currently have insufficient economic evidence to appropriately consider their investments in PtDAs.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affordable care act; Decision aid; Economic evaluation; Shared decision making

Year:  2014        PMID: 26250632     DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2014.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc (Amst)        ISSN: 2213-0764


  14 in total

1.  Is Shared Decision Making a Utopian Dream or an Achievable Goal?

Authors:  Louisa Blair; France Légaré
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Patient decision aid for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for use in the consultation: a feasibility study.

Authors:  J E Squires; D Stacey; M Coughlin; M Greenough; A Roberts; K Dorrance; M Clemons; J M Caudrelier; I D Graham; J Zhang; M Demery Varin; A Arnaout
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Potential cost-effectiveness for using patient decision aids to guide osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  H Penton; M Hiligsmann; M Harrison; J-Y Reginster; A Boonen; N Bansback
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  CORR Insights®: Is Shared Decision-making Associated with Better Patient-reported Outcomes? A Longitudinal Study of Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nicole A Wilson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 5.  Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.

Authors:  Janet Jull; Sascha Köpke; Maureen Smith; Meg Carley; Jeanette Finderup; Anne C Rahn; Laura Boland; Sandra Dunn; Andrew A Dwyer; Jürgen Kasper; Simone Maria Kienlin; France Légaré; Krystina B Lewis; Anne Lyddiatt; Claudia Rutherford; Junqiang Zhao; Tamara Rader; Ian D Graham; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-08

6.  Development of a patient decision aid prototype for adults with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Logan Trenaman; Sarah Munro; Fernanda Almeida; Najib Ayas; James Hicklin; Nick Bansback
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Assigning value to preparation for prostate cancer decision making: a willingness to pay analysis.

Authors:  Leslie S Wilson; Traci M Blonquist; Fangxin Hong; Barbara Halpenny; Seth Wolpin; Peter Chang; Christopher P Filson; Viraj A Master; Martin G Sanda; Gary W Chien; Randy A Jones; Tracey L Krupski; Donna L Berry
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Ter Stege; Leonie A E Woerdeman; Daniela E E Hahn; Martine A van Huizum; Frederieke H van Duijnhoven; Jacobien M Kieffer; Valesca P Retèl; Kerry A Sherman; Arjen J Witkamp; Hester S A Oldenburg; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Do choosing wisely tools meet criteria for patient decision aids? A descriptive analysis of patient materials.

Authors:  France Légaré; Jessica Hébert; Larissa Goh; Krystina B Lewis; Maria Ester Leiva Portocarrero; Hubert Robitaille; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Fostering Choice Awareness for Shared Decision Making: A Secondary Analysis of Video-Recorded Clinical Encounters.

Authors:  Marleen Kunneman; Megan E Branda; Ian Hargraves; Arwen H Pieterse; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.