Literature DB >> 26250603

Surgical accuracy of three-dimensional virtual planning: a pilot study of bimaxillary orthognathic procedures including maxillary segmentation.

K Stokbro1, E Aagaard2, P Torkov2, R B Bell3, T Thygesen2.   

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated the precision and positional accuracy of different orthognathic procedures following virtual surgical planning in 30 patients. To date, no studies of three-dimensional virtual surgical planning have evaluated the influence of segmentation on positional accuracy and transverse expansion. Furthermore, only a few have evaluated the precision and accuracy of genioplasty in placement of the chin segment. The virtual surgical plan was compared with the postsurgical outcome by using three linear and three rotational measurements. The influence of maxillary segmentation was analyzed in both superior and inferior maxillary repositioning. In addition, transverse surgical expansion was compared with the postsurgical expansion obtained. An overall, high degree of linear accuracy between planned and postsurgical outcomes was found, but with a large standard deviation. Rotational difference showed an increase in pitch, mainly affecting the maxilla. Segmentation had no significant influence on maxillary placement. However, a posterior movement was observed in inferior maxillary repositioning. A lack of transverse expansion was observed in the segmented maxilla independent of the degree of expansion.
Copyright © 2015 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer-assisted image processing; computer-assisted surgery; three-dimensional imaging; user-computer interface; virtual surgical planning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26250603     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  7 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography imaging superimposition protocols to assess outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review with comprehensive recommendations.

Authors:  Fernando de Oliveira Andriola; Orion Luiz Haas Junior; Raquel Guijarro-Martínez; Federico Hernández-Alfaro; Rogério Belle de Oliveira; Rogério Miranda Pagnoncelli; Gwen Rj Swennen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Transverse Expansion and Stability after Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Tue Lindberg Blæhr
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-12-28

3.  Soft-tissue-segmentation methods during image-guided precision liver surgery.

Authors:  Yongchang Zheng; Li He; Huayu Yang; Yi Bai; Fucun Xie; Kai Kang; Xuehu Wang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2018-07-31

4.  Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ali Alkhayer; József Piffkó; Carsten Lippold; Emil Segatto
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?

Authors:  Daniel Awad; Andy Häfner; Siegmar Reinert; Susanne Kluba
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-05

6.  Genioplasty using a simple CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) surgical guide.

Authors:  Se-Ho Lim; Moon-Key Kim; Sang-Hoon Kang
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-11-24

7.  Three-dimensional surgical accuracy between virtually planned and actual surgical movements of the maxilla in two-jaw orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Mihee Hong; Myung-Jin Kim; Hye Jung Shin; Heon Jae Cho; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.