Literature DB >> 26250585

Evaluating the role of treatment-related toxicities in the challenges facing targeted therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Daniel H Palmer1, Phillip J Johnson2.   

Abstract

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) is a complex disease beset by underlying liver dysfunction and high molecular heterogeneity. Sorafenib, introduced in 2007, is considered the standard systemic therapy for aHCC, yet only a minority of patients show objective evidence of a response radiologically, and median overall survival is still under 1 year. Other targeted drugs for the treatment of aHCC have failed to reach their primary endpoints of improved/non-inferior overall survival in comparison with sorafenib in recent phase 3 trials. Toxicity was a significant problem, raising the question as to whether outcomes in aHCC trials are being hindered by high levels of adverse events (AEs), particularly in populations with underlying cirrhosis. This is true of six recently failed phase 3 studies involving sunitinib, erlotinib, linifanib, brivanib (two trials), and everolimus, as well as ongoing phase 2 and 3 trials of other drugs that work through similar molecular pathways. This article reviews these drugs' toxicities, with a focus on AEs as a reason for their failure in phase 3 trials of patients with aHCC. We also review completed and ongoing phase 3 studies of combination therapies with sorafenib, as well as toxicities of many of the targeted agents in aHCC, including geographic/ethnic differences, measures of toxicity, and strategies to improve management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brivanib; HCC; Nintedanib; Sorafenib; Sunitinib; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26250585     DOI: 10.1007/s10555-015-9580-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  6 in total

1.  miR-615-5p prevents proliferation and migration through negatively regulating serine hydromethyltransferase 2 (SHMT2) in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wu; Liang Deng; Decai Tang; Gang Ying; Xuequan Yao; Fukun Liu; Gui Liang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 2.  Oncological Impact of M-Tor Inhibitor Immunosuppressive Therapy after Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe Tarantino; Paolo Magistri; Roberto Ballarin; Raffaele Di Francia; Massimiliano Berretta; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Prognostic value of microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Chao Wei; Cong-Cong Guo; Rong-Xiu Bi; Jin Xie; Dong-Hui Guan; Chuan-Hua Yang; Yue-Hua Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-14

4.  Prospective evaluation of an anti-cancer drugs management programme in a dedicated oral therapy center (DICTO programme).

Authors:  Elise Deluche; Tiffany Darbas; Kevin Bourcier; Loic Montangon; Geraldine Bayard; Evelyne Caille; Julie Querrioux; Chantal Suchaud; Sonia Zabaleta; Sabine Chaput; Valerie Le Brun-Ly; Julia Pestre; Laurence Venat; Frédéric Thuillier; Elodie Nevado; Gaelle Maillan; Jeremy Jost; Sophie Leobon; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; Sandrine Lavau-Denes
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  BEZ235 Increases the Sensitivity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Sorafenib by Inhibiting PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Inducing Autophagy.

Authors:  Weiya Cao; Xueke Liu; Yinci Zhang; Amin Li; Yinghai Xie; Shuping Zhou; Li Song; Ruyue Xu; Yongfang Ma; Shiyu Cai; Xiaolong Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A Hybrid Chalcone Combining the Trimethoxyphenyl and Isatinyl Groups Targets Multiple Oncogenic Proteins and Pathways in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Lili Cao; Lijun Zhang; Xiang Zhao; Ye Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.