| Literature DB >> 26250525 |
Hai-Wei Liang1, Sebastian Brüller1, Renhao Dong1,2, Jian Zhang2, Xinliang Feng2, Klaus Müllen1.
Abstract
Replacement of precious platinum with efficient and low-Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26250525 PMCID: PMC4918366 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8992
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the synthesis of the CoN/C electrocatalysts.
(1) Mixing of carbon, nitrogen, and cobalt precursors (Co-oPD, CoTMPP, or VB12) with the silica template and pyrolyzing of the mixture; (2) NaOH etching to remove the silica template and form CoNPs/CoN/C composites; (3) Acid etching with H2SO4 to remove Co-containing nanoparticles and formation of carbon-based catalysts containing CoN sites. The second and third heat treatments after the NaOH and H2SO4 etching steps are not shown.
Figure 2Electrocatalytic performance of the CoN/C electrocatalysts.
(a) HER polarization plots of the CoN/C, N/C, Co/N and Pt/C catalysts in 0.5 M H2SO4. (b) RRDE measurements of hydrogen evolution from a 0.5 M H2SO4 solution on different catalyst-modified electrodes. The Pt-ring electrode was maintained at 0.7 V for the oxidation of the H2 that was evolved on the disk electrode. (c) Tafel plots obtained from the polarization curves in a. (d) Initial and post-potential cyclic voltammograms of CoN/C (5000 cycles) and Co/N (100 cycles) in 0.5 M H2SO4. Potential sweeps were cycled between 0.2 and −0.25 V versus RHE (not iR-corrected). (e) HER polarization plots of CoN/C, N/C, Co/N and Pt/C catalysts in 1.0 M KOH. (f) Tafel plots obtained from the polarization curves in e. For all RDE and RRDE measurements, the catalyst loading is 2.0 mg cm−2 for non-Pt materials and 0.2 mg cm−2 (40 μgPt cm−2) for the Pt/C catalyst. For CoN/C catalysts, the cobalt loading is only 2.8 μgCo cm−2, based on the ICP-AES measurements. Electrode rotation speed: 1,600 r.p.m.; scan rate: 5 mVs−1.
Figure 3Catalyst characterization.
(a) TEM image of CoNPs/CoN/C. Scale bar, 100 nm. (b) TEM image of CoN/C and corresponding EFTEM elemental mapping demonstrating the homogeneous distribution of both cobalt and nitrogen at the atomic scale. Scale bar, 20 nm. (c) High-resolution TEM image of CoN/C showing the layered graphene structure without any metal particles or nanoclusters. Scale bar, 5 nm. (d) XPS survey spectra of CoNPs/CoN/C and CoN/C. (e) High-resolution Co2p spectra of CoNPs/CoN/C and CoN/C. (f) High-resolution N1s spectra of CoN/C.
Figure 4Understanding the structure of the active sites.
(a) Comparison of the HER activity of the CoNPs/CoN/C and CoN/C catalysts showing the influence of acid leaching. Insets are TEM images demonstrating that all cobalt particles were removed by acid leaching. (b) HER polarization plots of CoN/C with and without 10 mM KSCN in 0.5 M H2SO4, indicating that SCN− ions strongly poison the CoN/C catalyst. Insets are illustrations of cobalt centres blocked by the SCN− ions. These measurements indicated that the cobalt is involved in the active centers but not in the form of metallic nanoparticles.
Figure 5Comparison of the TOF of CoN/C with other catalysts.
TOF plots of the CoN/C catalyst together with other recently reported molecular and inorganic HER catalysts. Data adapted from: ref. 17 for UHV MoS2|Au (111); ref. 42 for [Mo3S13]2−|HOPG and [Mo3S13]2−|graphite paper; ref. 21 for double-gyroid MoS2; ref. 25 for Ni2P NPs; ref. 27 for CoP NPs; ref. 14 for Ni-bisdiphosphine/CNTs; ref. 39 for H2-CoCat. Data for CoN/C is from the present study.