Literature DB >> 26249830

A new device for improving dental implants anchorage: a histological and micro-computed tomography study in the rabbit.

Shlomo Barak1, Moshe Neuman1, Giovanna Iezzi2, Adriano Piattelli2, Vittoria Perrotti2, Yankel Gabet3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, a new healing cap that could generate a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) around titanium implants to stimulate peri-implant osteogenesis was tested in the rabbit model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 implants were inserted in the proximal tibial metaphysis of 22 rabbits. A healing cap containing the active device was inserted in half of the implants (11 test implants); an "empty" healing cap was inserted in the other ones (11 control implants). The animals were euthanized after 2 and 4 weeks, and the samples were processed for micro-computed tomography and histology. The peri-implant volume was divided into coronal (where the PEMF was the strongest) and apical regions.
RESULTS: Most of the effects of the tested device were confined to the coronal region. Two weeks post-implantation, test implants showed a significant 56% higher trabecular bone fraction (BV/TV), associated with enhanced trabecular number (Tb.N, +37%) and connectivity density (Conn.D, +73%) as compared to the control group; at 4 weeks, the PEMF induced a 69% increase in BV/TV and 34% increase of Tb.N. There was no difference in the trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) at either time point. Furthermore, we observed a 48% higher bone-to-implant contact (BIC) in the test implants vs. controls after 2 weeks; this increase tended to remain stable until the fourth week. Mature trabecular and woven bone were observed in direct contact with the implant surface with no gaps or connective tissue at the bone-implant interface.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the PEMF device stimulated early bone formation around dental implants resulting in higher peri-implant BIC and bone mass already after 2 weeks which suggests an acceleration of the osseointegration process by more than three times.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal study; dental implants; healing cap; histology; micro-computed tomography; osseointegration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26249830     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field protocols in implant osseointegration: in vivo and in vitro study.

Authors:  Camilla Magnoni Moretto Nunes; Camila Lopes Ferreira; Daniella Vicensotto Bernardo; Cássia Carolina Rabelo Lopes; Luma Collino; Victória Clara da Silva Lima; Daphne de Camargo Reis Mello; Luana Marotta Reis de Vasconcellos; Maria Aparecida Neves Jardini
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields increase osteogenetic commitment of MSCs via the mTOR pathway in TNF-α mediated inflammatory conditions: an in-vitro study.

Authors:  Letizia Ferroni; Chiara Gardin; Oleg Dolkart; Moshe Salai; Shlomo Barak; Adriano Piattelli; Hadar Amir-Barak; Barbara Zavan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effects of focused continuous pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on early tendon-to-bone healing.

Authors:  Oleg Dolkart; Efi Kazum; Yoav Rosenthal; Osnat Sher; Guy Morag; Elad Yakobson; Ofir Chechik; Eran Maman
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 5.  The Use of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields to Promote Bone Responses to Biomaterials In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Carlo Galli; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte; Stefano Guizzardi
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2018-09-03

6.  Effect of the Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) on Dental Implants Stability: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Bhukya P Nayak; Oleg Dolkart; Parth Satwalekar; Yeramala P Kumar; Anam Chandrasekar; Ophir Fromovich; Elad Yakobson; Shlomo Barak; Ulisses Dayube; Jamil A Shibli
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.