BACKGROUND: We investigated the effect of basal protein expression on trastuzamab response in patients with HER2-positive (HER2(+)) breast cancer who received trastuzamab (T) and in HER2(+) breast cancer cell lines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Expression of cytokeratin (CK) 5/6, CK14, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was evaluated after immunohistochemical staining in paraffin-embedded tissue of 97 patients with stage I to III HER2(+) breast cancer treated with chemotherapy/T. Groups with and without basal protein expression were compared with respect to clinicopathologic parameters and survival. We treated 4 cell lines (2 basal-HER2 [HCC1569, HCC1954] and 2 nonbasal HER2 [BT474, SKBR3]) each with vehicle, T 20 μg/mL, paclitaxel 0.01 μM (P), and T with P (T + P). Cell viability was assessed and HER2 pathway suppression was compared between groups using immunoblot analysis. Mammosphere formation was used to assess breast cancer stem cell properties. RESULTS: EGFR expression was significantly associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) (P = .05). CK5/6 expression strongly correlated with overall and disease-free survival, and CSS (P = .03, P = .04, and P = .03, respectively). Statistical significance was maintained for EGFR and CK5/6 after adjustment for covariates. CK14 was not associated with survival. All cell lines expressed similar levels of HER2. T and P alone inhibited proliferation of nonbasal cell lines; T + P had an additive cytotoxic effect. Basal cells were resistant to T, P inhibited proliferation, but T + P had no additive cytotoxic effect on cell growth in basal cells. Immunoblot analysis showed a significant decrease in phosphorylated Akt levels after treatment with T or T + P in nonbasal cells but not in basal cells. Akt blockade suppressed growth of basal and nonbasal HER2(+) cells. Furthermore, basal HER2 cell lines had increased mammosphere formation, which suggests increased stem cell properties compared with nonbasal HER2 cell lines. CONCLUSION: CK5/6 and EGFR expression are predictive of worse prognosis in HER2(+) breast cancer patients treated with T. Basal HER2 breast cancer cell lines are resistant to trastuzamab, which is mediated through the Akt pathway; AKT inhibition abrogates this resistance. Basal HER2 cell lines also have increased stem cell properties, which might play a role in the resistance pathway.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the effect of basal protein expression on trastuzamab response in patients with HER2-positive (HER2(+)) breast cancer who received trastuzamab (T) and in HER2(+) breast cancer cell lines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Expression of cytokeratin (CK) 5/6, CK14, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was evaluated after immunohistochemical staining in paraffin-embedded tissue of 97 patients with stage I to III HER2(+) breast cancer treated with chemotherapy/T. Groups with and without basal protein expression were compared with respect to clinicopathologic parameters and survival. We treated 4 cell lines (2 basal-HER2 [HCC1569, HCC1954] and 2 nonbasal HER2 [BT474, SKBR3]) each with vehicle, T 20 μg/mL, paclitaxel 0.01 μM (P), and T with P (T + P). Cell viability was assessed and HER2 pathway suppression was compared between groups using immunoblot analysis. Mammosphere formation was used to assess breast cancer stem cell properties. RESULTS:EGFR expression was significantly associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) (P = .05). CK5/6 expression strongly correlated with overall and disease-free survival, and CSS (P = .03, P = .04, and P = .03, respectively). Statistical significance was maintained for EGFR and CK5/6 after adjustment for covariates. CK14 was not associated with survival. All cell lines expressed similar levels of HER2. T and P alone inhibited proliferation of nonbasal cell lines; T + P had an additive cytotoxic effect. Basal cells were resistant to T, P inhibited proliferation, but T + P had no additive cytotoxic effect on cell growth in basal cells. Immunoblot analysis showed a significant decrease in phosphorylated Akt levels after treatment with T or T + P in nonbasal cells but not in basal cells. Akt blockade suppressed growth of basal and nonbasal HER2(+) cells. Furthermore, basal HER2 cell lines had increased mammosphere formation, which suggests increased stem cell properties compared with nonbasal HER2 cell lines. CONCLUSION:CK5/6 and EGFR expression are predictive of worse prognosis in HER2(+) breast cancerpatients treated with T. Basal HER2 breast cancer cell lines are resistant to trastuzamab, which is mediated through the Akt pathway; AKT inhibition abrogates this resistance. Basal HER2 cell lines also have increased stem cell properties, which might play a role in the resistance pathway.
Authors: Neil A O'Brien; Brigid C Browne; Lucy Chow; Yuhua Wang; Charles Ginther; Jane Arboleda; Michael J Duffy; John Crown; Norma O'Donovan; Dennis J Slamon Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Charles L Vogel; Melody A Cobleigh; Debu Tripathy; John C Gutheil; Lyndsay N Harris; Louis Fehrenbacher; Dennis J Slamon; Maureen Murphy; William F Novotny; Michael Burchmore; Steven Shak; Stanford J Stewart; Michael Press Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alessandra Fabi; G Metro; A Di Benedetto; C Nisticò; P Vici; E Melucci; B Antoniani; L Perracchio; I Sperduti; M Milella; F Cognetti; M Mottolese Journal: Oncology Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Marion Procter; Brian Leyland-Jones; Aron Goldhirsch; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Richard Bell; Christian Jackisch; David Cameron; Mitch Dowsett; Carlos H Barrios; Günther Steger; Chiun-Shen Huang; Michael Andersson; Moshe Inbar; Mikhail Lichinitser; István Láng; Ulrike Nitz; Hiroji Iwata; Christoph Thomssen; Caroline Lohrisch; Thomas M Suter; Josef Rüschoff; Tamás Suto; Victoria Greatorex; Carol Ward; Carolyn Straehle; Eleanor McFadden; M Stella Dolci; Richard D Gelber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Fiona M Blows; Kristy E Driver; Marjanka K Schmidt; Annegien Broeks; Flora E van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling; Maggie C Cheang; Karen Gelmon; Torsten O Nielsen; Carl Blomqvist; Päivi Heikkilä; Tuomas Heikkinen; Heli Nevanlinna; Lars A Akslen; Louis R Bégin; William D Foulkes; Fergus J Couch; Xianshu Wang; Vicky Cafourek; Janet E Olson; Laura Baglietto; Graham G Giles; Gianluca Severi; Catriona A McLean; Melissa C Southey; Emad Rakha; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Mark E Sherman; Jolanta Lissowska; William F Anderson; Angela Cox; Simon S Cross; Malcolm W R Reed; Elena Provenzano; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Alison M Dunning; Manjeet Humphreys; Douglas F Easton; Montserrat García-Closas; Carlos Caldas; Paul D Pharoah; David Huntsman Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Yun Wu; Maurizio Scaltriti; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Shaheenah Dawood; Francisco J Esteva; Aman U Buzdar; Huiqin Chen; Sameena Eksambi; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Jose Baselga; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Judith Hurley; Philomena Doliny; Isildinha Reis; Orlando Silva; Carmen Gomez-Fernandez; Pedro Velez; Giovanni Pauletti; Jodeen E Powell; Mark D Pegram; Dennis J Slamon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Fiona O'Neill; Stephen F Madden; Martin Clynes; John Crown; Padraig Doolan; Sinéad T Aherne; Robert O'Connor Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: Raksha R Bhat; Puja Yadav; Debashish Sahay; Dharmendra K Bhargava; Chad J Creighton; Sahar Yazdanfard; Ahmed Al-Rawi; Vikas Yadav; Lanfang Qin; Sarmistha Nanda; Vidyalakshmi Sethunath; Xiaoyong Fu; Carmine De Angelis; Vihang A Narkar; C Kent Osborne; Rachel Schiff; Meghana V Trivedi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Begoña Martin-Castillo; Eugeni Lopez-Bonet; Elisabet Cuyàs; Gemma Viñas; Sonia Pernas; Joan Dorca; Javier A Menendez Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-10-20