Literature DB >> 26248898

Reaction monitoring using online vs tube NMR spectroscopy: seriously different results.

David A Foley1, Anna L Dunn1,2, Mark T Zell1.   

Abstract

We report findings from the qualitative evaluation of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) reaction monitoring techniques of how each relates to the kinetic profile of a reaction process. The study highlights key reaction rate differences observed between the various NMR reaction monitoring methods investigated: online NMR, static NMR tubes, and periodic inversion of NMR tubes. The analysis of three reaction processes reveals that rates derived from NMR analysis are highly dependent on monitoring method. These findings indicate that users must be aware of the effect of their monitoring method upon the kinetic rate data derived from NMR analysis.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  NMR reaction monitoring; online NMR; reaction mechanism

Year:  2015        PMID: 26248898     DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Chem        ISSN: 0749-1581            Impact factor:   2.447


  3 in total

1.  Degradation Kinetics and Mechanism of Lithospermic Acid under Low Oxygen Condition Using Quantitative 1H NMR with HPLC-MS.

Authors:  Jianyang Pan; Xingchu Gong; Haibin Qu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  NMR reaction monitoring in flow synthesis.

Authors:  M Victoria Gomez; Antonio de la Hoz
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.883

3.  Chemical Reaction Monitoring using Zero-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Enables Study of Heterogeneous Samples in Metal Containers.

Authors:  Dudari B Burueva; James Eills; John W Blanchard; Antoine Garcon; Román Picazo-Frutos; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Dmitry Budker
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 15.336

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.