| Literature DB >> 26248568 |
Fabian Nietlispach1, Bernhard Meier2.
Abstract
Stroke is a devastating event for patients and their families. Paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a recognized cause of stroke. Percutaneous PFO closure is a simple and safe procedure. The debate on PFO closure is far from settled. This is, in part, due to the fact that the three published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PFO closure vs. medical therapy were negative regarding their primary endpoint; however, as-treated and per-protocol analyses as well as several meta-analyses report a benefit of PFO closure. In our opinion, PFO closure is underutilized and the results of the three RCTs are not adequately reflected in the current guidelines. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: PFO closure; Paradoxical embolism; Percutaneous; Prevention; Stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26248568 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J ISSN: 0195-668X Impact factor: 29.983