Literature DB >> 26248504

Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection.

Morten Magelssen1, Reidar Pedersen2, Reidun Førde2.   

Abstract

How may clinical ethics committees (CECs) inspire ethical reflection among healthcare professionals? How may they deal with organizational ethics issues? In recent years, Norwegian CECs have attempted different activites that stretch or go beyond the standard trio of education, consultation, and policy work. We studied the novel activities of Norwegian CECs by examining annual reports and interviewing CEC members. Through qualitative analysis we identified nine categories of novel CEC activities, which we describe by way of examples. In light of the findings, we argue that some novel working methods may be well suited to promote ethical reflection among clinicians, and that the CEC may be a suitable venue for discussing issues of organizational ethics.

Keywords:  Clinical ethics; Ethics committee; Organizational ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26248504     DOI: 10.1007/s10730-015-9291-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  11 in total

1.  Reinventing the Healthcare Ethics Committee.

Authors:  D C Blake
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2000-03

2.  Clinicians' evaluation of clinical ethics consultations in Norway: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Reidun Førde; Reidar Pedersen; Victoria Akre
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-10-02

3.  Rounding: how everyday ethics can invigorate a hospital's ethics committee.

Authors:  Evan G Derenzo; Nneka Mokwunye; John J Lynch
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2006-12

4.  Ethics committee DX: failure to thrive.

Authors:  Carol Bayley
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2006-12

5.  Is organizational ethics the remedy for failure to thrive? Toward an understanding of mission leadership.

Authors:  Patrick McCruden; Mark Kuczewski
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2006-12

6.  [Patient autonomy is not an easy matter].

Authors:  Berit Hofset Larsen; Helena Andersson; Reidun Førde
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2013-10-01

7.  Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation.

Authors:  Morten Magelssen; Reidar Pedersen; Reidun Førde
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Clinical ethics committees in Norway: what do they do, and does it make a difference?

Authors:  Reidun Førde; Reidar Pedersen
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Should patients who use illicit drugs be offered a second heart-valve replacement?

Authors:  Ingrid Miljeteig; Steinar Skrede; Jørund Langørgen; Rune Haaverstad; Ola Jøsendal; Haakon Sjursen; Ole Frithjof Norheim
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2013-05-07

10.  Do organizational and clinical ethics in a hospital setting need different venues?

Authors:  Reidun Førde; Thor Willy Ruud Hansen
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  Falling on deaf ears: a qualitative study on clinical ethical committees in France.

Authors:  Catherine Dekeuwer; Brenda Bogaert; Nadja Eggert; Claire Harpet; Morgane Romero
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2019-12

2.  Making the (Business) Case for Clinical Ethics Support in the UK.

Authors:  L L Machin; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2021-12

3.  Can clinical ethics committees be legitimate actors in bedside rationing?

Authors:  Morten Magelssen; Kristine Bærøe
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Engaging Tomorrow's Doctors in Clinical Ethics: Implications for Healthcare Organisations.

Authors:  Laura L Machin; Robin D Proctor
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2021-12

5.  Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting.

Authors:  Morten Magelssen; Ingrid Miljeteig; Reidar Pedersen; Reidun Førde
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Implementing clinical ethics committees as a complex intervention: presentation of a feasibility study in community care.

Authors:  Morten Magelssen; Heidi Karlsen; Reidar Pedersen; Lisbeth Thoresen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.