| Literature DB >> 26247575 |
Manuela Pinheiro1, Carla Pinto1, Ana Peixoto1, Isabel Veiga1, Paula Lopes2, Rui Henrique3, Helena Baldaia4, Fátima Carneiro5, Raquel Seruca6, Ian Tomlinson7, Michal Kovac8, Karl Heinimann8, Manuel R Teixeira9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously reported that the target genes in sporadic mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) in the distal colon differ from those occurring elsewhere in the colon. This study aimed to compare the target gene mutational pattern in microsatellite instability (MSI) CRC from Lynch syndrome patients stratified by tumour location and germline mutation, as well as with that of sporadic disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26247575 PMCID: PMC4647680 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Clinicopathologic characteristics of Lynch syndrome patients and families
| Families | 50 | 16 (32%) | 27 (54%) | 6 (12%) | 1 (2%) | 48 | 26 (54%) | 21 (44%) | 1 (2%) |
| Amsterdam | 27 (54%) | 9 (33%) | 17 (63%) | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 33 (69%) | 22 (67%) | 10 (30%) | 1 (3%) |
| Bethesda | 23 (46%) | 7 (30%) | 10 (43%) | 5 (22%) | 1 (4%) | 15 (31%) | 4 (27%) | 11 (73%) | 0 (0%) |
| CRC patients | 65 | 25 (38%) | 33 (51%) | 6 (9%) | 1 (2%) | 49 | 27 (55%) | 21 (43 %) | 1 (2%) |
| Female | 32 (49%) | 13 (41%) | 16 (50%) | 2 (6%) | 1 (3%) | 26 (53%) | 14 (54%) | 11 (42%) | 1 (4%) |
| Male | 33 (51%) | 12 (36%) | 17 (52%) | 4 (12%) | 0 (0%) | 23 (47%) | 13 (57%) | 10 (43%) | 0 (0%) |
| Mean | 46 | 46 | 46 | 44 | 55 | 45 | 45 | 46 | 48 |
| Range | 15–75 | 27–68 | 15–75 | 21–71 | 21–79 | 30–65 | 21–79 | ||
| ⩽50 | 55 (71%) | 21 (38%) | 29 (53%) | 5 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 35 (69%) | 19 (54%) | 15 (43%) | 1 (3%) |
| >50 | 23 (29%) | 10 (43%) | 11 (48%) | 1 (4%) | 1 (4%) | 16 (31%) | 9 (56%) | 7 (44%) | 0 (0%) |
| Total CRC | 78 | 31 (40%) | 40 (51%) | 6 (8%) | 1 (1%) | 51 | 28 (55%) | 22 (43%) | 1 (2%) |
| Proximal | 51 (65%) | 23 (45%) | 24 (47%) | 4 (8%) | 0 (0%) | 35 (69%) | 22 (63%) | 12 (34%) | 1 (3%) |
| Distal | 27 (35%) | 8 (30%) | 16 (59%) | 2 (7%) | 1 (4%) | 16 (31%) | 6 (38%) | 10 (63%) | 0 (0%) |
| I/II | 45 (68%) | 20 (44%) | 23 (51%) | 2 (4%) | – | 32 (70%) | 20 (63%) | 12 (38%) | 0 (0%) |
| III/IV | 21 (32%) | 9 (43%) | 9 (43%) | 3 (14%) | – | 14 (30%) | 6 (43%) | 7 (50%) | 1 (7%) |
| Well/moderately | 53 (90%) | 20 (38%) | 28 (53%) | 5 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 25 (66%) | 15 (60 %) | 10 (40 %) | 0 (0%) |
| Poorly | 6 (10%) | 2 (33%) | 3 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (17%) | 13 (34%) | 9 (69%) | 4 (31%) | 0 (0%) |
Abbreviations: CRC=colorectal carcinoma; TNM=tumor node metastasis.
Information was not available for 12 and 5 CRC from the Portuguese and Swiss Lynch syndrome families, respectively.
Information was not available for 19 and 13 CRC from the Portuguese and Swiss Lynch syndrome families, respectively.
Mutational frequency of the target gene microsatellite sequences according to tumour location in the Lynch syndrome MSI-H test (Porto) series
| 70/77 (90.9) | 46/51 (90.2) | 24/26 (92.3) | 1 | |
| 69/77 (89.6) | 46/51 (90.2) | 23/26 (88.5) | 1 | |
| 68/76 | 44/50 (88.0) | 24/26 (92.3) | 0.708 | |
| 57/76 | 36/50 (72.0) | 21/26 (80.8) | 0.578 | |
| 40/75 | 30/50 (60.0) | 10/25 (40.0) | 0.141 | |
| 38/77 (49.4) | 20/51 (39.2) | 18/26 (69.2) | ||
| 34/77 (44.2) | 21/51 (41.2) | 13/26 (50.0) | 0.478 | |
| 32/77 (41.6) | 19/51 (37.3) | 13/26 (50.0) | 0.333 | |
| 27/77 (35.1) | 13/51 (25.5) | 14/26 (53.8) | ||
| 22/77 (28.6) | 15/51 (29.4) | 7/26 (26.9) | 1 | |
| 19/77 (24.7) | 10/51 (19.6) | 9/26 (34.6) | 0.170 | |
| 16/77 (20.8) | 9/51 (17.6) | 7/26 (26.9) | 0.382 | |
| 7/77 (9.1) | 6/51 (11.8) | 1/26 (3.8) | 0.412 | |
| 6/77 (7.8) | 6/51 (11.8) | 0/26 (0.0) | 0.091 | |
| 6/77 (7.8) | 0/51 (0.0) | 6/26 (23.1) | ||
| 3/77 (3.9) | 1/51 (2.0) | 2/26 (7.7) | 0.262 |
Abbreviations: CRC=colorectal carcinoma; MSI=microsatellite instability.
We did not detect mutations in BMPR1A microsatellite sequences. P<0.05 are indicated in bold.
One proximal CRC case was not analysed for this gene.
Two cases (one proximal and one distal CRC were not analysed for this gene.
Figure 1Box-plot analyses of the frequency of target gene mutations (Y axis) in CRC samples from the test series categorised by MMR germline mutation (X axis). The mean comparison was calculated using the one-way ANOVA test. Statistical significance among the samples was assessed using the Scheffe's multiple comparison test.
Figure 2Mutational frequency of the microsatellite sequences (A)7 of BMPR2 and (A)8 of MSH3 according to tumour location in tumours from both series of Lynch syndrome patients.
Mutational frequency of MSH3, BMPR2 (A)7 and PTEN microsatellite sequences according to tumour location in the Lynch syndrome MSI-H series of Porto, Switzerland and combined
| Porto | 38/77 (49.4) | 20/51 (39.2) | 18/26 (69.2) | ||
| 27/77 (35.1) | 13/51 (25.5) | 14/26 (53.8) | |||
| 6/77 (7.8) | 0/51 (0) | 6/26 (23.1) | |||
| Switzerland | 24/51 (47.1) | 16/35 (45.7) | 8/16 (50) | 1.000 | |
| 20/51 (39.2) | 12/35 (34.3) | 8/16 (50) | 0.360 | ||
| 6/51 (11.8) | 6/35 (17.1) | 0/16 (0) | 0.159 | ||
| Total | 62/128 (48.4) | 36/86 (41.9) | 26/42 (61.9) | ||
| 47/128 (36.7) | 25/86 (29.1) | 22/42 (52.4) | |||
| 12/128 (9.4) | 6/86 (7) | 6/42 (14.3) | 0.206 |
Abbreviation: MSI=microsatellite instability. P<0.05 are indicated in bold.
Figure 3Mutational frequency in TGFBR2 (A)10 and MSH3 (A)8 microsatellite sequences categorised by tumour location in sporadic (Pinheiro ) and Lynch syndrome MSI CRC (present report).
Mutational frequency of TGFBR2 and MSH3 microsatellite sequences according to tumour location in Lynch syndrome and sporadic MSI-H carcinomas (Pinheiro )
| Lynch | 69/77 (89.6) | 46/51 (90.2) | 0.661 | 23/26 (88.5) | 0.00006 | |
| Sporadic | 27/42 (64.3) | 21/22 (95.5) | 6/20 (30) | |||
| Lynch | 38/77 (49.4) | 20/51 (39.2) | 0.011 | 18/26 (69.2) | 0.001 | |
| Sporadic | 20/42 (47.6) | 16/22 (72.7) | 4/20 (20) |
Abbreviation: MSI=microsatellite instability.